logo
Search for anything...
About

Best Docusign Alternatives

Written by Paddy Stobbs

Co-Founder & CEO

Edited by Steph Leung

Product & Operations Lead

Updated onMar 14, 2025
DocuSign has changed how businesses handle agreements, and it is a leader in the electronic signature market with its document management and authentication capabilities. However, several alternatives might better serve particular use cases, depending on specific needs. Signeasy offers a streamlined experience that outperforms DocuSign’s mobile interface for mobile-focused teams. Small businesses and individuals might find DocHub’s approach more accessible than DocuSign’s enterprise-level features. Sales teams could benefit from PandaDoc’s document creation tools and template library. Organizations already using Dropbox can integrate more easily with Dropbox Sign, while companies prioritizing form collection before signatures would be better served by Jotform’s form-building capabilities. Each alternative presents distinct advantages for specific workflows, potentially offering more tailored solutions than DocuSign’s approach.

Best alternatives to Docusign

For mobile-first document signing needs:

Signeasy product logo

Signeasy

Stackfix Rating:

7.3 / 10

While DocuSign dominates the enterprise eSignature market, Signeasy emerges as a superior choice for mobile-first document signing needs. Its streamlined interface offers ease of use compared to DocuSign, making it more accessible on mobile devices. The platform’s minimalist approach eliminates complex features that often clutter mobile screens, focusing instead on core signing functionality. Signeasy’s mobile app prioritizes quick document turnaround with a clean, intuitive design that helps users complete signatures faster than DocuSign’s more feature-heavy mobile interface. For teams prioritizing mobile document signing, Signeasy’s straightforward workflow and mobile-optimized experience make it the more practical choice.

Jump to product

For basic document signing for small teams or individuals:

DocHub product logo

DocHub

Stackfix Rating:

5.6 / 10

Small teams and individuals seeking basic document signing will find DocHub’s streamlined approach more practical than DocuSign’s enterprise-focused solution. While DocuSign offers extensive functionality, DocHub’s straightforward interface and quick 5-10 minute setup make it ideal for simple signing needs. The intuitive design simplifies document management. Additionally, DocHub requires less initial configuration time, making it easier for teams primarily focused on collecting basic signatures without complex workflows. DocHub eliminates the learning curve and overhead of DocuSign’s advanced features, providing a direct and uncomplicated signing experience.

Jump to product

For document creation and signing for sales teams:

PandaDoc product logo

PandaDoc

Stackfix Rating:

8.2 / 10

Sales teams seeking a more intuitive document creation and signing solution will find PandaDoc excels over DocuSign in three crucial areas. First, PandaDoc’s drag-and-drop builder keeps all essential tools—fields, payments, integrations, data merge, and content blocks—in one unified interface, streamlining the document creation process. Second, PandaDoc offers 1,000+ pre-filled templates compared to DocuSign’s 30+, giving sales teams more ready-to-use options. Third, PandaDoc provides robust role-based permissions with granular control over user access and actions, making it easier to manage team workflows. Additionally, PandaDoc allows recipients to suggest document edits directly, enabling faster collaboration between sales teams and clients.

Jump to product

For small business document signing within the Dropbox ecosystem:

Dropbox Sign product logo

Dropbox Sign

Stackfix Rating:

6.0 / 10

Small businesses can streamline their document signing workflow by choosing Dropbox Sign over alternatives for three compelling reasons. First, Dropbox Sign offers seamless integration with the Dropbox ecosystem, enabling direct file access and management without switching platforms. Second, its straightforward interface focuses on essential signing features without the complexity of enterprise-grade tools, making it more approachable for small teams. Third, while both platforms provide secure document signing, Dropbox Sign’s native integration with Dropbox storage simplifies document organization and retrieval for businesses already invested in the Dropbox ecosystem.

Jump to product

For form-first workflows where signatures are secondary:

Jotform product logo

Jotform

Stackfix Rating:

7.2 / 10

While DocuSign excels at complex eSignature workflows, Jotform emerges as the superior choice for form-first workflows where signatures are secondary. Its web form builder stands out with an extensive template library of over 10,000 form templates and comprehensive field customization options. The platform’s intuitive interface makes form creation more approachable than DocuSign’s document-first approach. Additionally, Jotform’s form-centric design allows for more sophisticated data collection and validation before the signature stage, with features like custom color schemes, spacing controls, and detailed form styling options that surpass DocuSign’s form capabilities.

Jump to product

PS

Meet your expert: Paddy Stobbs

Stackfix Co-Founder & CEO

I've spent over a decade deep in the world of business software - personally managing more than $2M in purchases across companies I've built and led. From intimate 10-person teams to organizations of 150+, I've developed a particular obsession with Sales and HR tools – testing, implementing, and scaling them at every stage of growth. My journey started at Cambridge University, led me through Google, and most recently culminated in selling my previous venture to TikTok. Now, I'm channeling all of that hands-on experience into helping others navigate the complex landscape of business software.

Docusign logo

Docusign

Signeasy logo

Signeasy

DocHub logo

DocHub

PandaDoc logo

PandaDoc

Dropbox Sign logo

Dropbox Sign

Jotform logo

Jotform

Our rating
Functionality
10

Functionality

10/10

<p>Docusign provides a complete eSignature solution, supporting web forms and payment collection while signing. The drag-and-drop builder allows extensive customization, enabling various input fields with validation and custom properties. Users can control signing order, enable signer delegation, e-witnessing, and in-person signing, and manage team access with custom permissions. The reports dashboard tracks completion rates for high document volumes. Security features include password protection and ID verification.</p>
6

Functionality

6/10

<p>Signeasy provides a very easy-to-use eSignature solution but that comes with major limitations in some regular, and many advanced, eSignature features. It doesn’t support payment collection, signer delegation, or e-witnessing. A massive drawback is field customizability—no custom fields, formula fields, conditional fields, or dropdowns. It also lacks auto-suggestion for field placement and auto-fill from integrations, making document setup more manual. Security is weak—no password protection, ID verification, or knowledge-based authentication, only 2-Factor Authentication.</p>
4

Functionality

4/10

<p>DocHub is a basic eSignature tool with limited features. It lacks web forms, payment collection, formula, custom, and conditional fields. It doesn’t auto-suggest or place fields, support signer delegation, or offer e-witnessing. There's no reporting dashboard, but the "Sent" page provides an overview of document statuses.</p>
8

Functionality

8/10

<p>PandaDoc provides a complete eSignature solution with web forms, payment collection, and a drag-and-drop builder for customizable fields with validation. Users can control signing order, delegate signers, enable e-witnessing, and in-person signing. It includes rooms with pre-set content for collaboration and tracking insights. A workflow automation builder lets users configure automations with integrations, supported by pre-made templates. The reports dashboard tracks completion rates, and security features like password protection and ID verification.That said, it lacks certain advance functionality such as a dedicated eWitness workflow.</p>
7

Functionality

7/10

<p>Dropbox Sign is an okay eSignature solution but has some limitations. It lacks web forms, custom fields, and formula fields, limiting customization. Files must be requested separately, and it doesn’t auto-suggest or place fields. There's no signer delegation or e-witnessing, restricting some workflows. Advanced security like knowledge-based authentication is missing, but password protection is available. The reports dashboard tracks usage and signature statuses, but overall, advanced features are limited.</p>
4

Functionality

4/10

<p>Jotform is a good eSignature solution with excellent web forms, but its eSignature features are limited as they are separate. It supports payment collection and has a mobile app but isn’t ideal for large-scale sending—no bulk send and limited auto-fill. It lacks witness and in-person signing, and eSign reports are minimal, showing only document status. Security includes password protection and audit trails but lacks ID verification or KBA.</p>
Ease of Use
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>The platform is easy to use, though advanced document preparation takes some learning. The clean, modern design and field auto-placement make document creation faster. The builder supports custom fields, so you can reuse validation across documents. Bulk sending, auto-reminders, and auto-fill from integrations help speed up workflows. A file upload field means you don’t have to request documents separately, and Docusign lets you collect payments when you share documents. You can also edit and resend documents without voiding them, making corrections quick and simple.</p>
10

Ease of Use

10/10

<p>For basic e-signature sharing and collecting, Signeasy maintains a good range of features and its limited functionality contributes to its ease of use rating.&nbsp;If you're focused on core e-signature needs and don't require advanced reporting or complex workflows, the pie chart report view works great for tracking document statuses.&nbsp;The lack of payment collection, and other advanced features keeps the focus on e-signatures, making it exceptionally user-friendly.</p>
8

Ease of Use

8/10

<p>For basic eSignature sharing and collection, DocHub offers a basic feature set, with its simplicity contributing to ease of use. It’s okay for core eSignature needs but lacks reporting, conditional / controlled input, and e-witness or signer delegation, which may limit certain agreements. Despite these gaps, it remains quite user-friendly.</p>
8

Ease of Use

8/10

<p>The platform is easy to use, though advanced document preparation takes some learning. The clean, modern design and field auto-placement speed up document creation. The drag-and-drop builder keeps everything—custom fields, payments, integrations, data merge, and content blocks—in one place, making it easy to manage. Bulk sending, auto-reminders, and auto-fill from integrations streamline workflows. A file upload field removes the need for separate document requests, and PandaDoc allows payment collection when sharing documents. You can also edit and resend without voiding, making corrections quick and simple.</p>
6

Ease of Use

6/10

<p>The platform is easy to use with a clean, modern design, but it lacks field auto-placement for faster document creation. The builder doesn’t support custom fields, and there’s no file upload field, meaning documents must be requested separately—a major drawback. However, bulk sending, auto-reminders, and auto-fill from integrations help streamline workflows. Users can also edit and resend documents without voiding them, making corrections quick and simple.</p>
9

Ease of Use

9/10

<p>For basic eSignature sharing and collection, Jotform offers a solid feature set, with its simplicity contributing to ease of use. It’s great for core eSignature needs but lacks advanced reporting, bulk sending, and e-witness or in-person signing, which may limit certain agreements. Despite these gaps, it remains exceptionally user-friendly.</p>
Look and feel
8

Look and feel

8/10

<p>Although it has one of the highest number of features in the category, Docusign does a fantastic job of keeping the interface clean and intuitive. Advanced controls are nicely hidden away, making navigation smooth. The UI is modern, and key features are exactly where you’d expect.</p><p>The drag-and-drop builder is easy to use. The homepage clearly displays pending, waiting, expiring, and completed documents in a large font. The reports section provides deeper, but still easy to understand, insights on statuses and activity. For companies handling high volumes of signatures, document management is straightforward and efficient.</p>
8

Look and feel

8/10

<p>Signeasy keeps things simple, and that's its strength. The interface is clean and modern, with everything right where you'd expect to find it. The drag-and-drop builder is easy to use, and while you won't get fancy reporting features, their simple pie chart is perfect for tracking document status at a glance.</p>
5

Look and feel

5/10

<p>DocHub has a clean but overly simple interface that could show more details on the dashboard and documents pages for quicker access to key information. The drag-and-drop builder feels slightly outdated, requiring users to open field options manually instead of using a persistent sidebar, making it less efficient.</p>
10

Look and feel

10/10

<p>Although feature-rich, PandaDoc has a delightful interface with a well-balanced theme and color usage. Advanced controls are neatly hidden, ensuring smooth navigation.</p><p><br></p><p>In our opinion, it has the best drag-and-drop builder, keeping fields, payments, integrations, data merge, and content blocks all in one place, making management of all of them easy. When creating a document, you can set a theme and apply it throughout. It has a beautiful workflow overview too, making the platform both powerful and user-friendly.</p>
6

Look and feel

6/10

<p>Although Dropbox Sign has a solid set of features, the interface is simple, modern, and has a nice theme. Navigation is straightforward, but it’s more of a file management platform than a typical layout for managing eSignature documents and tracking them. The drag-and-drop builder is easy to use but not as advanced as some competitors.&nbsp;</p>
6

Look and feel

6/10

<p>Jotform keeps things simple with a clean, modern interface and an intuitive drag-and-drop builder. The theme is well-designed, and there’s a handy preview of the email and document before signing while customizing the signing order. However, the UI has a somewhat playful, less formal design and feels overly simplified for eSignatures, as it’s part of a platform primarily built for web forms.</p>
Customisability
9

Customisability

9/10

<p>Docusign is highly flexible, offering control over branding, field properties, signing order, and team member permissions. You can use formula fields, custom fields, and conditional logic to show or hide objects based on inputs. The platform supports in-person signing, e-witnessing, and signer delegation, covering all signing flows. You can configure custom permissions for team member roles, ensuring the right access levels. You can also create custom reports for better insights.</p>
5

Customisability

5/10

<p>Signeasy handles basic e-signatures but lacks key advanced features. No e-witnessing and signer delegation means some signing flows aren’t covered. A major drawback is the absence of custom reports, forcing API reliance for insights. It also lacks custom user permissions. Field options are heavily limited—no dropdowns, custom fields, formula fields, or conditional objects. You're mostly restricted to placing basic input fields without real control over form customization, making it far less flexible than other solutions.</p>
4

Customisability

4/10

<p>DocHub handles basic e-signatures but lacks key advanced customizability like e-witnessing and signer delegation, limiting signing flows. It also doesn’t support custom fields, formula fields, or conditional fields, reducing document customization. User permissions can't be customized either.</p>
10

Customisability

10/10

<p>PandaDoc is highly flexible, offering control over branding, field properties, signing order, and team permissions. Users can customize themes when creating documents. It supports formula fields, custom fields, and conditional logic to show or hide objects based on inputs. Signing flows include in-person signing, e-witnessing, and signer delegation. Granular role-based permissions allow precise control over user access and actions. Custom reports provide deeper insights. Best-in-class for custom roles and user permissions, making it easy to manage security and workflows at a detailed level.</p>
5

Customisability

5/10

<p>Dropbox Sign handles basic e-signatures but lacks key advanced customizability like e-witnessing and signer delegation, limiting signing flows. It also doesn’t support radio buttons, custom fields, or formula fields, reducing document customization. User role and permission control is minimal—you can only manage folder-level view/edit access for team members.</p>
7

Customisability

7/10

<p>Jotform handles basic e-signatures, but it's missing key advanced functionalities, including e-witnessing, meaning not all signing flows are covered.&nbsp;The absence of custom reports is a significant drawback, making it difficult to get detailed insights without API reliance.&nbsp;While the platform is simple overall, it's got decent control over branding options.</p>
Ease of Setup
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>Docusign offers a free trial and self-serve purchasing for all tiers except the Enterprise option. The onboarding process is simple, allowing users to create eSignature documents within 5-10 minutes. It integrates directly with many platforms, reducing the need for Zapier. Custom permission profiles and branding are easy to configure. Despite its many features, the help docs are well-organized and detailed. Setting up reusable templates, security settings, and user roles takes a few hours, while enterprise-level setup may take 1-2 weeks.</p>
10

Ease of Setup

10/10

<p>Signeasy offers a simple onboarding process with a free trial and self-serve purchasing for all tiers except custom plans. Users can create their first eSignature document within minutes, and setting up templates, security settings, and signer roles takes a couple of hours at most due to the limited customizability. You can't set custom permissions for team members, and branding is straightforward to configure. Integration options are very limited - with no Zapier support, connecting to other platforms requires API development.</p>
9

Ease of Setup

9/10

<p>DocHub offers a free trial with self-serve purchasing for all tiers except enterprise. Onboarding is quick, allowing users to create eSignature documents in 5–10 minutes. Custom branding and integrations are easy to set up (since they are very limited), while configuring reusable templates might take an hour or two.</p>
5

Ease of Setup

5/10

<p>PandaDoc offers a free trial, but higher-tier plans require a demo request, and enterprise plans require speaking with sales. The onboarding process is simple, allowing users to create eSignature documents within 5–10 minutes. It integrates directly with many platforms, though Google Drive and Dropbox require Zapier. Custom permission profiles and branding are easy to configure. Despite its many features, the help docs are well-organized and detailed. Setting up reusable templates, security settings, and user roles takes a few hours, while enterprise-level setup may take 1–2 weeks.</p>
5

Ease of Setup

5/10

<p>Dropbox Sign offers a free trial, but the highest tier plan requires speaking with sales. The onboarding process is simple, allowing users to create eSignature documents within 5–10 minutes. It integrates directly with many platforms, though Pipedrive and Slack require Zapier. Custom branding is easy to configure. Despite its many features, the help docs are well-organized and detailed. Setting up reusable templates, security settings, and user roles takes a few hours, while enterprise-level setup may take around a week.</p>
9

Ease of Setup

9/10

<p>Jotform offers a free trial with self-serve purchasing for all tiers except enterprise. Onboarding is quick, allowing users to create eSignature documents in 5–10 minutes. Custom branding and integrations are easy to set up, while configuring reusable templates, security settings, and user roles may take a few hours.</p>
Customer Support
10

Customer Support

10/10

<p>Docusign offers four support plans with different response times on average. Standard Support (included with subscriptions) has a &lt;24-hour response time. Plus Support improves this to &lt;6 hours and adds phone and technical support. Premier Support offers a &lt;4-hour response time, emergency support within 1 hour, and API integration help. Enterprise Premier Support provides the fastest response, with &lt;2 hours for regular issues and &lt;30 minutes for critical emergencies. All plans include system monitoring, online case management, and access to the Docusign Support Center.</p>
5

Customer Support

5/10

<p>Signeasy offers customer support via their Help Center, which includes self-help articles and video tutorials. Their support team is available from 1 PM - 10 PM GMT / 8 AM - 5 PM ET, with response times typically under 24 hours. There is a live chat bot for assistance, but no direct phone support for general inquiries.</p>
5

Customer Support

5/10

<p>DocHub support allows users to submit requests via email (with replies typically within a few days) and offers a toll-free US support number. They have a well-organized Help Center, but users should search within it directly rather than using a search engine, as many SEO-driven pages inaccurately list features they don't offer.</p>
9

Customer Support

9/10

<p>Support is available 24/7, 365 days a year via live chat or by submitting a request. Users can access personalized Q&amp;A through in-app chat, where friendly human agents provide helpful responses within minutes. The platform also offers self-serve support with high-depth, high-quality resources.</p>
5

Customer Support

5/10

<p>Dropbox Sign offers customer support based on your plan. All users can access the Help Center with a good range of articles and guides. Email support is available via request submission, but live chat and phone support are limited to higher-paid tiers. Response times for email support are typically within one business day, but this can be faster for users with the paid support add-on.</p>
9

Customer Support

9/10

<p>Jotform’s support team is available 24/7, and you can contact them by submitting a request, with an average response time of 2 hours and 30 minutes. They also have an extensive help center with guides, FAQs, and a community forum for troubleshooting.</p>
Integratability
10

Integratability

10/10

<p>Docusign natively integrates with major platforms like Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Google Drive, Dropbox, Stripe, PayPal, Microsoft 365, and Slack. It also supports Zapier, enabling access to thousands of additional integrations. An API is available for custom integrations and automation.</p>
2

Integratability

2/10

<p>Integrations are severely limited, although it integrates with HubSpot and Google Drive natively. It doesn’t integrate with most platforms like Salesforce or Slack, and there’s no Zapier. Most connections require their API, so if you’re not familiar with coding, options are minimal.</p>
1

Integratability

1/10

<p>Integrations are severely limited, with only Google Drive and Dropbox supported. It doesn’t integrate with platforms like Salesforce or Slack, and there’s no Zapier or API access, making custom integrations nearly impossible.</p>
9

Integratability

9/10

<p>PandaDoc natively integrates with popular platforms like Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Stripe, PayPal, and Slack. Google Drive and Dropbox require Zapier, which also enables access to thousands of additional integrations. Microsoft 365 integration is limited, covering basic functions. An API is available for custom integrations and automation.</p>
8

Integratability

8/10

<p>Dropbox Sign natively integrates with platforms like Salesforce, HubSpot, and Google Drive. Pipedrive, Stripe, and PayPal require Zapier, which also connects to thousands of other apps. An API is available for custom integrations and automation.</p>
8

Integratability

8/10

<p>Jotform natively integrates with popular platforms like Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, and Slack. Microsoft Excel integration requires Zapier, which also enables access to thousands of additional integrations. An API is available for custom integrations and automation.</p>
Ease of Migration
10

Ease of Migration

10/10

<p>Docusign offers multiple ways to export completed document data. Finished documents can be exported as PDFs, audit trails are available in CSV format. A wide range of reports can be downloaded as CSV or exported as image charts. Reports can also be scheduled, with control over frequency, time intervals, start/end dates, and CC recipients. Native CRM integrations allow seamless data syncing, and additional data can be exported through the API for further customization and automation.</p>
4

Ease of Migration

4/10

<p>Signeasy offers minimal data export options. Finished documents can be downloaded as PDFs, with options for document-only, audit trail-only, or both. Reports can be downloaded for custom dates but only show basic stats—sent, completed, declined, voided, self-signed, signature requests received, and expired (per team member). With no native integrations except HubSpot, data syncing is limited, requiring API exports for customization and automation.</p>
2

Ease of Migration

2/10

<p>DocHub offers minimal data export options, partly due to no Zapier or API access. Finished documents and audit trails can be exported as PDFs, and another major drawback is the lack of downloadable reports for tracking insights across multiple documents.</p>
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>PandaDoc offers multiple ways to export completed document data. Finished documents can be exported as PDFs, audit trails are available in CSV format. A wide range of reports can be downloaded as CSV. Native CRM integrations allow seamless data syncing, and additional data can be exported through the API for further customization and automation.</p>
7

Ease of Migration

7/10

<p>Dropbox Sign offers multiple ways to export completed document data. Finished documents can be exported as PDFs with the audit trail. You can also share via Dropbox and export to various platforms using quick-access buttons. Native CRM integrations enable seamless data syncing, with API options for further customization.</p>
7

Ease of Migration

7/10

<p>Jotform offers multiple ways to export completed document data. Finished documents can be exported as PDFs with the audit trail. You can also download submission data in CSV format. Native integrations enable seamless data syncing, with API options for further customization.</p>

Signeasy: Docusign alternative for mobile-first document signing needs

Signeasy product logo
Signeasy

Stackfix Rating:

7.3 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

$15

Calculate your price
Updated onMar 14, 2025
While DocuSign dominates the enterprise eSignature market, Signeasy emerges as a superior choice for mobile-first document signing needs. Its streamlined interface offers ease of use compared to DocuSign, making it more accessible on mobile devices. The platform’s minimalist approach eliminates complex features that often clutter mobile screens, focusing instead on core signing functionality. Signeasy’s mobile app prioritizes quick document turnaround with a clean, intuitive design that helps users complete signatures faster than DocuSign’s more feature-heavy mobile interface. For teams prioritizing mobile document signing, Signeasy’s straightforward workflow and mobile-optimized experience make it the more practical choice.

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of Docusign vs. Signeasy.

Pros

  • Exceptionally Easy Setup Process

  • User-Friendly Core Experience

  • Clean, Modern Interface Design

Cons

  • Severely Limited Integration Capabilities

  • Poor Field Customization Options

  • Basic Customer Support Structure

  • Limited Export and Reporting Capabilities

  • Weak Security Features

DocHub: Docusign alternative for basic document signing for small teams or individuals

DocHub product logo
DocHub

Stackfix Rating:

5.6 / 10

Visit website

Updated onMar 14, 2025
Small teams and individuals seeking basic document signing will find DocHub’s streamlined approach more practical than DocuSign’s enterprise-focused solution. While DocuSign offers extensive functionality, DocHub’s straightforward interface and quick 5-10 minute setup make it ideal for simple signing needs. The intuitive design simplifies document management. Additionally, DocHub requires less initial configuration time, making it easier for teams primarily focused on collecting basic signatures without complex workflows. DocHub eliminates the learning curve and overhead of DocuSign’s advanced features, providing a direct and uncomplicated signing experience.

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of Docusign vs. DocHub.

Pros

  • Quick and Simple Setup

  • User-Friendly Interface

Cons

  • Limited Integration Capabilities

  • Basic Functionality Missing Critical Features

  • Minimal Data Export Capabilities

  • Mediocre Customer Support

PandaDoc: Docusign alternative for document creation and signing for sales teams

PandaDoc product logo
PandaDoc

Stackfix Rating:

8.2 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

$35

Calculate your price
Updated onMar 14, 2025
Sales teams seeking a more intuitive document creation and signing solution will find PandaDoc excels over DocuSign in three crucial areas. First, PandaDoc’s drag-and-drop builder keeps all essential tools—fields, payments, integrations, data merge, and content blocks—in one unified interface, streamlining the document creation process. Second, PandaDoc offers 1,000+ pre-filled templates compared to DocuSign’s 30+, giving sales teams more ready-to-use options. Third, PandaDoc provides robust role-based permissions with granular control over user access and actions, making it easier to manage team workflows. Additionally, PandaDoc allows recipients to suggest document edits directly, enabling faster collaboration between sales teams and clients.

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of Docusign vs. PandaDoc.

Pros

  • Exceptional Document Creation Functionality

  • Strong Integration Capabilities

  • Outstanding User Interface

  • Superior Customization Options

  • Excellent Customer Support

Cons

  • Long Setup Process for Enterprises

Dropbox Sign: Docusign alternative for small business document signing within the Dropbox ecosystem

Dropbox Sign product logo
Dropbox Sign

Stackfix Rating:

6.0 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

$21.60

Calculate your price
Updated onMar 14, 2025
Small businesses can streamline their document signing workflow by choosing Dropbox Sign over alternatives for three compelling reasons. First, Dropbox Sign offers seamless integration with the Dropbox ecosystem, enabling direct file access and management without switching platforms. Second, its straightforward interface focuses on essential signing features without the complexity of enterprise-grade tools, making it more approachable for small teams. Third, while both platforms provide secure document signing, Dropbox Sign’s native integration with Dropbox storage simplifies document organization and retrieval for businesses already invested in the Dropbox ecosystem.

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of Docusign vs. Dropbox Sign.

Pros

  • Excellent Auto-fill Capabilities

  • Extensive Integration Options

  • Strong Security and Audit Features

Cons

  • Limited Document Customization

  • Restricted Customer Support

  • Poor Signing Order Management

  • Weak Team Permission Controls

Jotform: Docusign alternative for form-first workflows where signatures are secondary

Jotform product logo
Jotform

Stackfix Rating:

7.2 / 10

Visit website

Updated onMar 14, 2025
While DocuSign excels at complex eSignature workflows, Jotform emerges as the superior choice for form-first workflows where signatures are secondary. Its web form builder stands out with an extensive template library of over 10,000 form templates and comprehensive field customization options. The platform’s intuitive interface makes form creation more approachable than DocuSign’s document-first approach. Additionally, Jotform’s form-centric design allows for more sophisticated data collection and validation before the signature stage, with features like custom color schemes, spacing controls, and detailed form styling options that surpass DocuSign’s form capabilities.

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of Docusign vs. Jotform.

Pros

  • Exceptional Customer Support

  • Strong Integration Capabilities

  • Quick and Simple Setup Process

  • User-Friendly Interface

Cons

  • Poor Auto-Field Detection

  • Severely Limited Reporting Capabilities

  • Basic Signing Order Implementation

  • Missing Critical Authentication Features

  • Limited Document Editing Capabilities

How we test products

With eSignature tools playing a critical role in modern business operations, we focus on identifying the best options for small and midsize businesses. Our evaluation process reflects real-world usage, prioritizing functionality, ease of use, and overall value. Here’s how we do it:

Functionality

eSignature software should do more than just collect signatures—it should streamline workflows, ensure compliance, and integrate seamlessly with existing processes. We start by identifying key use cases—document signing, workflow automation, audit trails, and security—then test how well each platform supports these needs. Tools that provide essential features without unnecessary complexity score highest.

User Experience & Onboarding

A great eSignature platform should be intuitive for both senders and signers. We test each platform’s interface by navigating core features without prior training and track onboarding time—from account setup to sending and signing a document. Platforms that require extensive setup or technical expertise lose points.

Security & Compliance

Legally binding eSignatures require strong security measures. We evaluate encryption standards, authentication methods, and compliance with regulations like eIDAS, UETA, and ESIGN. Platforms with weak security features or limited compliance options score lower.

Integrations & Compatibility

eSignature tools must work seamlessly with CRMs, contract management systems, and productivity tools. We test how well each product integrates with essential business applications and assess whether native integrations or third-party connectors are required.

Pricing & Value

We compare pricing across competitors, analyzing what each plan includes and whether critical features are locked behind paywalls. Hidden costs—such as per-document fees, API access charges, or required enterprise plans—are factored into our assessment. Platforms that offer strong core functionality at a fair price score highest.

Stackfix’s Fit Score

All of these factors contribute to Stackfix’s Fit Score, a proprietary ranking system that measures how well each eSignature tool aligns with a buyer’s needs. It combines two key elements:

  • Requirements Met – How many buyer requirements the software fulfills
  • Stackfix Rating – Our expert assessment of the software’s overall quality, usability, and value

The result? A clear, data-driven recommendation that helps businesses choose the right eSignature software—without hours of trial and error.

FAQs

What is an eSignature tool?

Put simply, an eSignature tool is a platform that allows you to sign documents digitally – quickly, securely, and legally. It eliminates the need for printing, scanning, and mailing paperwork, making contract signing and approvals seamless. The key features of an eSignature tool usually include:

  • Digital Signing – Enables users to sign documents electronically from any device, eliminating the need for physical paperwork.
  • Document Management – Stores and organizes signed contracts, agreements, and other important documents in one place for easy access.
  • Compliance & Security – Ensures documents are legally binding and meet industry regulations, with encryption, audit trails, and authentication features.
  • Workflow Automation – Streamlines approval processes by sending automated reminders, tracking document status, and reducing manual follow-ups.
  • Integrations – Connects with CRMs, project management tools, and cloud storage services to keep documents flowing seamlessly within your existing workflow.

What should I consider when buying an eSignature tool?

Choosing the right eSignature tool can streamline your document workflows and eliminate bottlenecks in contract approvals – so it’s important to find one that fits your business needs, tech stack, and budget. Here are the key factors to consider before making your decision.

  1. Your requirements. Start by defining what you need the eSignature tool to accomplish. Are you a small team looking for a simple signing solution, or do you need advanced features like bulk sending, approval workflows, and compliance tracking? Consider your current needs as well as future growth.
  2. Ease of use. A complicated signing process defeats the purpose of using an eSignature tool. Look for an intuitive platform that makes it easy for both your team and your clients to sign documents without unnecessary friction. That’s why Stackfix gives every eSignature tool an ‘Ease of Use’ rating – so you can quickly see which ones are simple and user-friendly. Click into each product above to find the right fit for your team.
  3. Technical infrastructure. Think about how the tool fits into your existing tech stack. Do you need integrations with CRM, contract management, or cloud storage software? If you’re handling high document volumes, does the tool support automation and bulk sending without performance issues?
  4. Cost. Don’t just look at the base price – consider additional fees for features like API access, advanced authentication, or storage limits. Some platforms appear affordable at first but scale up in cost quickly as your usage grows.
  5. Compliance and security. eSignature tools handle legally binding documents, so make sure the platform meets industry standards for encryption, audit trails, and compliance (e.g. eIDAS, ESIGN, UETA). If you operate in a regulated industry, ensure the tool offers advanced security features like multi-factor authentication and role-based permissions.
  • Customer support. You might not think about support – until something goes wrong. Check whether the vendor offers 24/7 assistance, dedicated account managers, or self-serve resources like help centers and community forums. To make this easier, Stackfix rates every eSignature tool on customer support. Click into each product above to see how they compare.

What are the common mistakes to avoid when buying an eSignature tool?

Avoiding common pitfalls when choosing an eSignature tool can save you time, money, and frustration down the line. Here are some of the biggest mistakes businesses make – and how to avoid them.

  1. Choosing based on features instead of usability. Many companies go for the most feature-packed eSignature tool without considering whether they actually need all the bells and whistles. A platform with dozens of complex features won’t help if your team or clients find it difficult to use. Focus on usability, reliability, and a smooth signing experience over just ticking off feature lists.
  2. Not planning for compliance needs. eSignatures need to be legally binding, but different industries and regions have different requirements. If you operate in a regulated sector or deal with international contracts, check whether the tool meets compliance standards like eIDAS, ESIGN, UETA, or HIPAA.
  3. Failing to think about scalability. Many startups choose an eSignature tool that works for their current needs but struggle when they need to handle more users, higher document volumes, or advanced workflows. Consider where your business will be in a few years – will the tool still meet your needs, or will you have to switch again?
  4. Overlooking integrations. eSignature tools don’t work in isolation – they need to fit into your existing workflow. Before committing, check if the tool integrates seamlessly with your CRM, contract management software, cloud storage, and productivity apps. If an integration exists, test it to make sure it syncs the right data and fields properly.
  5. Ignoring hidden costs. Some eSignature tools look affordable at first but charge extra for critical features like API access, advanced authentication, or bulk sending. Make sure to factor in all potential costs, especially as your usage scales.

How much does eSignature Software typically cost?

Most eSignature software ranges from free to $500+ per month, with entry-level options starting around $15-20, mid-market solutions costing $100-300 per month, and enterprise-level solutions costing $35-55+ monthly. In Most vendors structure pricing in tiers based on features and document volume, so be sure to enter your requirements as accurately as possible in our pricing calculator.

Several providers (like BoldSign, Zoho Sign, and Jotform) offer free plans with basic functionality, though these typically restrict monthly signature limits and advanced features like conditional fields or API access.

For enterprise plans and above, you can expect to speak to sales for a bespoke price. These custom quotes typically factor in integration requirements, compliance needs, and user volume. To skip the demo calls, be sure to check out our pricing calculator.

Compare other eSignature Tools

View our comparisons of other eSignature