Search for anything...

Best Screenloop Alternatives

Written by Steph Leung

Product & Operations Lead

Edited by Paddy Stobbs

Co-Founder & CEO

Updated onMar 14, 2025

Screenloop has emerged as a notable player in the recruitment software market, offering a streamlined approach to hiring processes. However, for organizations with specific recruitment needs, several alternatives provide specialized functionality that Screenloop currently lacks. Greenhouse Recruiting excels with its custom candidate data fields, allowing teams to capture organization-specific information tailored to their unique requirements. Breezy HR stands out with comprehensive bulk candidate management capabilities, enabling efficient handling of multiple applicants simultaneously. For those focused on LinkedIn recruitment, Loxo delivers superior proactive candidate sourcing through its Chrome extension and automated outreach tools. Meanwhile, Personio offers exceptional support for multi-country European hiring with its extensive language options and regional job board integrations. This comparison explores how these alternatives address specific recruitment challenges that Screenloop doesn't currently solve, helping hiring teams identify the best solution for their particular needs in 2025.

Best alternatives to Screenloop

For creating custom candidate data fields:

Greenhouse Recruiting

Stackfix Rating:

6.0 / 10

Greenhouse Recruiting distinguishes itself through robust custom candidate data fields functionality. Unlike Screenloop, which lacks this capability, Greenhouse empowers users to add tailored fields to candidate profiles, capturing organization-specific information such as skills, certifications, language proficiency, and other relevant criteria. This customization allows hiring teams to collect and track precisely the candidate information that matters most to their organization.

Jump to product

For creating custom candidate data fields:

Jump to product

Greenhouse Recruiting

Stackfix Rating:

6.0 / 10

For bulk candidate management:

Breezy

Stackfix Rating:

6.7 / 10

Breezy excels at bulk candidate management through its workflow automation and comprehensive bulk actions. Unlike Screenloop, which lacks bulk actions, Breezy enables hiring teams to simultaneously email candidates, move them between pipeline stages, send questionnaires, and export candidate data to CSV files. Additionally, Breezy’s stage actions feature allows automated emails, nurture campaigns, questionnaires, and feedback collection to trigger when candidates move between stages, creating a more efficient and scalable hiring process.

Jump to product

For bulk candidate management:

Jump to product

Breezy

Stackfix Rating:

6.7 / 10

For proactive candidate sourcing from LinkedIn:

Loxo

Stackfix Rating:

7.9 / 10

Loxo’s Chrome extension and email outreach capabilities make it a powerful tool for proactively sourcing candidates from LinkedIn. While Screenloop lacks a Chrome extension for importing LinkedIn profiles, Loxo allows recruiters to add candidates directly from LinkedIn with a single click. Additionally, Loxo’s unlimited and customizable email sequences enable efficient outreach campaigns, compared to Screenloop’s limited workaround requiring manual candidate creation. For teams focused on sourcing technical talent from LinkedIn, Loxo’s purpose-built functionality streamlines the entire process from identification to engagement.

Jump to product

For proactive candidate sourcing from LinkedIn:

Jump to product

Loxo

Stackfix Rating:

7.9 / 10

For hiring across multiple European countries:

Personio

Stackfix Rating:

5.2 / 10

Personio stands out as a compelling choice for hiring across multiple European countries due to its comprehensive language support and extensive job board network. The platform supports eight European languages – German, English, Spanish, French, Dutch, Italian, Swedish, and Finnish – enabling seamless recruitment across these regions. Additionally, Personio integrates with over 600 job boards across Europe, significantly expanding its reach compared to alternatives with more limited job board coverage. This combination of multi-language capability and broad job board network makes Personio particularly effective for companies expanding their workforce across European markets.

Jump to product

For hiring across multiple European countries:

Jump to product

Personio

Stackfix Rating:

5.2 / 10

Meet your expert: Steph Leung

Stackfix Product & Operations Lead

After building HR tech and spending countless hours on vendor selection in my previous roles, I discovered how painful it is to find the right business software. Now at Stackfix, I've dedicated over 800 hours to testing and reviewing software solutions so others don't have to go through the same struggle. I have a particular love for beautiful, opinionated products that do one thing exceptionally well and just work.

Stackfix Comparison

	Screenloop	Greenhouse Recruiting	Breezy	Loxo	Personio

Our rating
Functionality	9 Functionality 9/10 <p>Screenloop combines solid, easy-to-use functionality with standout AI features. Its automation, analytics, career site builder, and interview scorecards are all strong — intuitive to use and built with modern hiring teams in mind.</p><p>What really sets Screenloop apart, though, is the AI. The note-taking, pros and cons, and summary tools make interviews faster, more structured, and far less manual. Many users highlight how these features save hours and cut out the usual back-and-forth chasing feedback after interviews.</p>	9 Functionality 9/10 <p>Greenhouse is a legacy, heavyweight ATS that offers all functionality that most companies, including enterprises will need.</p><p>The only features missing are the more delightful touches for candidate experience (e.g. allowing candidates to upload a video on their application form) or granular reporting functionality offered by newer ATS, such as Teamtailor and Ashby.</p>	7 Functionality 7/10 <p>Breezy has a strong level of functionality offering a CV parser, pre-screening questions, data analytics/reporting, interview scheduling, scorecards and reusable interview pipelines.</p><p><br></p><p>It lacks a few useful time-saving integrations that its more heavyweight ATS competitors have. Most notable of these is a chrome extension allowing users to import candidate profiles directly from linkedIn and other job boards. Breezy requires candidates from external job boards to be added manually.</p>	7 Functionality 7/10 <p>Loxo offers nearly all functionality that an SMB will need: email automation, a career site builder, CV parser, interview scorecards etc.) The most notable functions which is missing is candidate assessments which can incur the user extra costs should they wish to conduct such assessments.</p><p>AI sourcing features are particularly strong. New features now allow you to see why the AI has chosen to source a particular candidate.</p>	6 Functionality 6/10 <p>Personio offers some functionality most SMBs will need for hiring, including creating interview pipelines, creating job ads, interview kits & scorecards, candidate self-scheduling, a Chrome extension for sourcing candidates.</p><p>However, it lacks some key functionality, such as asking pre-screening questions.</p>
Ease of Use	7 Ease of Use 7/10 <p>Given how much functionality and customisation Screenloop offers, it’s surprisingly easy to use. Key information is easy to find, and most workflows feel intuitive. That said, a few of the more advanced features can take a bit more time to get to grips with.</p><p>For most startup teams, a half-day and a bit of guidance is enough to get comfortable with the core features.</p>	3 Ease of Use 3/10 <p>Users we've interviewed (and ourselves) find Greenhouse very complex, and difficult to locate key information. There are too many buttons to click to do something, so everything takes longer than it needs to.</p><p>Teams need to invest significant upfront time for training to fully utilize Greenhouse. </p>	6 Ease of Use 6/10 <p>Breezy is easy to use once you know where to find all the relevant customisations and functionality. These feature, however, are often buried in a settings menu which can be overwhelmingly long.</p><p>That being said, once you have gained familiarity with the location of different features, these features are very intuitive to use.</p><p><br></p><p>In our experience, the average SMB employee would require one day to master all functionalities of the product.</p><p>This number would likley be higher, but the very informative 'how to' videos and other self-serve documents speed up the process greatly.</p>	8 Ease of Use 8/10 <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Loxo has a simple and easy-to-use interface. We estimate an average start-up employee would require around 2 hours minimal guidance to master all the key functionalities of the product.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Most functions and processes are easy to find and intuitive. Some more complex workflows can feel unnecessarily long-winded. For example, when adding custom questions to an application form, first a form must be created with all custom questions you wish to add and then this form can be added to your original application form. However, there are very few features like this.</span></p>	4 Ease of Use 4/10 <p>We find Personio's UX is subpar, with unintuitive navigation for key information like candidate applications and confusing workflows.</p><p>The process for customizing pipelines and application forms is unnecessarily complex, requiring navigation through multiple settings tabs.</p>
Look and feel	8 Look and feel 8/10 <p>Screenloop has a clean, modern UI that’s a pleasure to use. Pages load in under a second, and all the drag-and-drop features feel smooth and reliable.</p>	5 Look and feel 5/10 <p>We find Greenhouse visually acceptable but looks a bit tired/ dated both in its internal and external facing elements.</p>	5 Look and feel 5/10 <p>Certain features of Breezy have a somewhat dated look. The Kanban dashboard new is sufficiently sleek, however the side bar - where many of the functionalities are found - has a tired look to it.</p><p><br></p><p>Loading times are not exceptionally fast either - but acceptable. Changing between dashboards can often take 2 seconds which can become frustrating.</p>	8 Look and feel 8/10 <p>Loxo is not stunning but it is, visually, more than acceptable. </p><p>The loading times between pages are also fast (~1 second) creating a frictionless UX.</p>	5 Look and feel 5/10 <p>While Personio has a clean and simple interface that is visually acceptable, it suffers from slow loading times (3-4 seconds per page).</p>
Customisability	7 Customisability 7/10 <p>Screenloop covers all the basics when it comes to customisation — interview pipelines, application form questions, and light tweaks to your career page. But some advanced options are missing. There’s no support for custom CSS, custom analytics, or control over the platform’s layout.</p>	8 Customisability 8/10 <p>Greenhouse offers high customizability. Users can customize fields, dashboards, alerts, scorecards, and even use custom CSS for external elements. </p>	8 Customisability 8/10 <p>Breezy boasts a high level of customisation. Career pages can have customised by appearance, messaging (including language) capabilities, displaying social media, listing perks, displaying testimonials, general media and layout. Custom CSS/JavaScript can also be added.</p><p><br></p><p>Similarly, interview pipelines can be customised per position. They can be saved under a particular name or job title and reused again. As many stages as required can be added or removed to new or existing pipelines.</p><p><br></p><p>Usefully, new team members can be added to teams or an entirely new teams can be created to oversee a particular job position.</p>	7 Customisability 7/10 <p>Loxo offers most of the customisations than any SMB will need. These include: customisable scorecards, interview pipelines, application forms (with plenty of question types), custom reporting functions and customisable outreach campaigns. However, some of these customisations are particularly extensive. For example, there is not option to an overall score to a candidate via the scorecard functionality and the careers page only offers basic customisations.</p>	5 Customisability 5/10 <p>Personio allows you to make standard adjustments to your interview pipelines, interview kits and career pages. However, users are unable to build custom reports, and customisability on application forms are limited e.g. you cannot add a pre-screening question.</p>
Ease of Setup	5 Ease of Setup 5/10 <p>Screenloop doesn’t offer a free trial and requires a sales conversation to get started, as pricing is custom.</p><p>Once you've got access, the initial setup is quick - posting your first job, adding your hiring team, and setting up basic stages takes less than 30 minutes.</p><p>If you want to fully customise key features, you’ll need a bit more time. With guidance from their team, you can get everything tailored in under a week.</p>	4 Ease of Setup 4/10 <p>Greenhouse does not offer a free trial and purchasing requires you to talk to sales. Due to Greenhouse's unintuitive user interface, it takes 30-60 mins to complete basic setup. Fully customizing key features takes approximately a week.</p>	7 Ease of Setup 7/10 <p>Breezy offers a free trial that doesn't require speaking to sales. Purchasing after the free trial also doesn't require speaking to sales. it takes <30mins to complete basic setup (posting first job opening, adding hiring team members, configuring basic hiring stages). Fully customizing key features takes <1week.</p>	9 Ease of Setup 9/10 <p>Loxo offers a free plan and purchasing doesn't require you to speak to sales. Completing basic setup takes <30mins and fully customizing key features takes approximately 1 business day.</p>	6 Ease of Setup 6/10 <p>Personio offers a free trial, however, purchasing requires you to talk to sales. It takes 30-60mins to complete basic setup due to the platform having an unintuitive UI. Fully customizing the platform takes <1week.</p>
Customer Support	8 Customer Support 8/10 <p>Personalised support is only available via email and live chat — and only after you’ve signed up. That said, response times are fast (usually under an hour), and the support team is genuinely helpful. We've heard many glowing reviews from users that corroborate this. </p><p>One flaw here is that Screenloop’s self-serve resources are limited. There’s a solid introductory video to get you started, but detailed docs on specific features are lacking. </p>	6 Customer Support 6/10 <p>While we haven't been able to test this ourselves, users we've interviewed report that it takes longer for the support team to respond compared to competitors such as Lever and Workable.</p>	8 Customer Support 8/10 <p>Breezy has excellent self-services materials under their 'ATS help centre' to help you with any functional queries you may have. These span 6 categories, with up 47 articles in each category. They include how-to's on all functionality that Breezy offers so rest assured that if you are unable to find a feature, Breezy's help centre will almost always be able to help you. The amount of self-serve materials can make it difficult to know where to look for advice, but they do follow an intuitive structure and flow such that in our experience it does not take too long.</p><p><br></p><p>Breezy offers both email and live chat when communicating with customer support. Replies are fast, friendly and personalised. It usually takes <1 hour to receive a reply and the Breezy team are always willing to work to find solutions.</p>	10 Customer Support 10/10 <p>Customer service as Loxo is exceptional. E<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">mail, phone and video support is all offered, as well as, dedicated onboarding and setup consultations. A personalised Q&A is available via in-app, live chat with friendly, human agents who offer helpful response within minutes during business hours. </span></p><p><br></p><p>The self-service materials also have great depth and quality. Loxo's knowledge base and training centre a offers videos and articles with step-by-step instructions about how to use specific functions, as well as, tips about best practices to maximise Loxo's capabilities.</p>	5 Customer Support 5/10 <p>You can reach Personio's support team via web tickets and callbacks in-app during UK/ Germany business hours. Unlike most HRIS's, live chat doesn't seem available as an option. Users we've interviewed have complained about Personio ignoring requests, especially for English channels.</p>
Integratability	6 Integratability 6/10 <p>Screenloop’s integrations are strong across the board — HRIS, e-signatures, email, calendars, and background checks are all easy to use and well embedded in the UI. The one gap is candidate assessments. There’s no native feature or third-party integration, which could be a dealbreaker if assessments are a key part of your hiring process.</p>	10 Integratability 10/10 <p>With 450 pre-built integrations with third-party tools and an open API, Greenhouse definitely has one of the richest integration ecosystem out of ATS's we've come across. It integrates with most HRIS's, screening and collaboration tools.</p>	8 Integratability 8/10 <p>Breezy has strong pre-built integrations for most functions that a hiring team will need. These include candidate assessments (e.g. Test Gorilla), background checks (e.g. Chekr), HRISs (e.g. Bamboo HR) and external job boards (e.g. LinkedIn and Indeed).</p><p><br></p><p>Breezy also has open API should your business want to add any custom integrations.</p>	6 Integratability 6/10 <p>Loxo offers API that allows users to build desired integrations where necessary. However, they do not integrate with many third party hiring products. For example, they lack assessment software, background checks and HRIS integrations. Furthermore, some integrations are limited. For example, the integration with Zoom only allows you to click a 'join meeting' button. You cannot create or attend meetings through the Loxo UI.</p>	6 Integratability 6/10 <p>Personio offers 150+ pre-built integrations with most relevant products across most categories. However, it is missing key integrations with popular assessment tools (e.g. Test Gorilla) and video interview tools (e.g. Hirevue). It also offers an API for custom integrations.</p>
Ease of Migration	6 Ease of Migration 6/10 <p>Screenloop’s analytics are fully self-serve and cover all the key hiring metrics — from stage-by-stage volume to offer acceptance rates. It also goes a step further with more advanced insights, like their “quality of hire” metric, which tracks how well new hires perform in their first 180 days. You can break this down by team or hiring manager, making it a powerful tool for spotting patterns and improving your process.</p>	6 Ease of Migration 6/10 <p>We've found the reporting module of Greenhouse lacks flexibility and is not user-friendly. Exporting crucial candidate information, such as DE&I attributes, poses a challenge. Changes made to interview stages during the hiring process can also complicate data exports.</p>	7 Ease of Migration 7/10 <p>On a paid tier (star-up, x or business) you can bulk export key candidate data into a CVS file. This includes: name, email, phone number, resume, address, source of application, date added and last activity (last stage completed).</p><p>A <strong>separate </strong>export of questionnaire responses can also be done into a CSV file.</p><p><br></p><p>However, non-candidate-specific data analytics (time to hire, time to fill, acceptance rates etc), despite being reported and visually displayed in a dashboard, cannot be exported.</p>	8 Ease of Migration 8/10 <p>Key data is available self-serve via the analytics dashboard. Custom metrics can be created and viewed on the same dashboard. This data can be exported to a CSV file self-serve.</p>	7 Ease of Migration 7/10 <p>Bamboo allows users to export key data data via self-serve. Export of most other data are also available via API or on request .However, users have reported difficulty while exporting data from reports. </p>

Greenhouse Recruiting: Screenloop alternative for creating custom candidate data fields

Greenhouse Recruiting

Stackfix Rating:

6.0 / 10

Visit website

Updated onMar 14, 2025

Greenhouse - Careers Page

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of Screenloop vs. Greenhouse Recruiting.

Pros

Richest integration ecosystem of all ATS's

Robust reporting functionality

Enforces structured hiring proceses

Robust Functionality Suite

Advanced Workflow Automation

Powerful Job Board Distribution

Cons

Expensive, and forces an annual contract

Inflexible and complex reporting functionality

Complex UX

Mediocre Customer Support

Limited No-Code Careers Page Customization

Compare all Recruiting software Read the full review

Breezy: Screenloop alternative for bulk candidate management

Breezy

Stackfix Rating:

6.7 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

Calculate your price

Updated onMar 14, 2025

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of Screenloop vs. Breezy.

Pros

Powerful workflow automation

Flexible interview pipeline setup

Highly customizable careers page

Strong integration capabilities

Reliable customer support

Cons

No LinkedIn Chrome Extension

Missing Candidate Feedback Surveys

Compare all Recruiting software Read the full review

Loxo: Screenloop alternative for proactive candidate sourcing from LinkedIn

Loxo

Stackfix Rating:

7.9 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

Calculate your price

Updated onMar 14, 2025

Loxo - Set up interview pipelines

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of Screenloop vs. Loxo.

Pros

Strong features for outbound sourcing

Intuitive User Interface

Efficient Interview Pipeline Management

Outstanding Customer Support

Strong Workflow Automation

Cons

Basic Reporting Functionality

Limited Careers Page Customization

Limited Candidate Evaluation Capabilities

Convoluted Job Advertisement Creation

Limited Integration Capabilities

Compare all Recruiting software Read the full review

Personio: Screenloop alternative for hiring across multiple European countries

Personio

Stackfix Rating:

5.2 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

Custom Pricing

Calculate your price

Updated onMar 14, 2025

Personio - Create a careers page

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of Screenloop vs. Personio.

Pros

Integrated HRIS+ATS Solution

Extensive Job Board Network

Multi-language Support

Comprehensive Candidate Evaluation Tools

Cons

Limited integrations

Weak interview scheduling functionality

Basic Career Page Customization

Poor Ease of Use

Weak Workflow Automation

Poor customer support

Compare all Recruiting software Read the full review

How we test products

With so many Recruiting software options available, we focus on identifying the best solutions for small and midsize businesses. Our evaluation process reflects real-world usage, prioritizing functionality, ease of use, and overall value. Here’s how we do it:

Functionality

Recruiting software should streamline hiring workflows, improve candidate sourcing, and enhance the overall hiring process. We start by identifying key use cases—job posting, applicant tracking, interview scheduling, candidate communication, and analytics—then test how well each platform supports these needs. Tools that offer essential features without unnecessary complexity score highest.

User Experience & Onboarding

A great Recruiting tool should be intuitive for hiring managers and recruiters. We test each platform’s interface by navigating core features without prior training and track onboarding time—from account setup to managing the first job listing. Platforms that require complex setup or manual adjustments lose points.

Automation & AI Capabilities

Hiring teams need automation to manage high applicant volumes efficiently. We evaluate each platform’s automation features, such as resume screening, interview scheduling, and AI-driven candidate matching. Tools that enhance efficiency without adding unnecessary complexity score highest.

Integrations & Compatibility

Recruiting software must integrate smoothly with HR platforms, job boards, and communication tools. We test how well each product connects with essential business systems and assess whether native integrations or third-party connectors are required.

Pricing & Value

We compare pricing across competitors, analyzing what each plan includes and whether critical features are locked behind paywalls. Hidden costs—such as per-job posting fees, add-ons for AI-powered features, or required enterprise plans—are factored into our assessment. Platforms that offer strong core functionality at a fair price score highest.

Stackfix’s Fit Score

All of these factors contribute to Stackfix’s Fit Score, a proprietary ranking system that measures how well each Recruiting tool aligns with a buyer’s needs. It combines two key elements:

Requirements Met – How many buyer requirements the software fulfills
Stackfix Rating – Our expert assessment of the software’s overall quality, usability, and value

The result? A clear, data-driven recommendation that helps businesses choose the right Recruiting software—without hours of trial and error.

FAQs

What is Recruiting software?

Put simply, Recruiting software (also known as an Applicant Tracking System, or ATS) is a platform that helps businesses manage, track, and streamline the hiring process efficiently. It acts as a central hub for all recruiting activities, allowing teams to post jobs, source candidates, manage interviews, and track hiring progress—ensuring a seamless and organized hiring experience. The key features of recruiting software usually include:

Job Posting & Distribution: Tools to create job listings and automatically distribute them to multiple job boards and career pages.
Candidate Management: A structured system to track applicants throughout the hiring process, from initial application to final offer.
Resume Parsing & Screening: AI-powered tools that scan and categorize resumes to help recruiters quickly identify top candidates.
Interview Scheduling & Collaboration: Automated interview scheduling, integrated calendars, and shared feedback tools to keep hiring teams aligned.
Analytics & Reporting: Insights into hiring speed, candidate quality, and source effectiveness to optimize recruitment efforts.

What should I consider when buying Recruiting software?

Choosing the right recruiting software can make or break your hiring process—so it’s essential to find one that fits your hiring needs, integrates with your existing tools, and aligns with your budget. Here are the key factors to consider before making your decision.

Your Hiring Needs. Start by assessing your current and future hiring requirements. Do you need simple recruiting software for occasional hires, or are you scaling rapidly and require automation, multi-channel sourcing, and advanced analytics? Identifying your priorities will help you choose the right tool.
Ease of Use. Recruiting software should make recruiting faster and more efficient—not more complicated. Look for an intuitive interface that recruiters and hiring managers can use with minimal training. Overly complex platforms can slow down hiring and frustrate your team. That’s why Stackfix rates every recruiting software on ease of use—click into each product above to see how they compare.
Integration with Your Tech Stack. Your recruiting software needs to work seamlessly with your HR software, email, video conferencing tools, and calendar apps. If you use Slack, Zoom, or an HRIS for onboarding, check if the ATS offers native integrations or requires third-party connectors.
Scalability & Flexibility. As your business grows, your hiring needs will evolve. Ensure that the recruiting software can scale with your team, supporting multiple recruiters, departments, and hiring workflows. Look for features like customizable hiring pipelines, automation for repetitive tasks, and integrations with external recruiting agencies.
Pricing & Hidden Costs. Recruiting software pricing varies widely, often based on per-user fees, job postings, or advanced automation add-ons. What seems affordable now could become expensive as your hiring volume increases. Check for extra costs related to resume parsing, advanced reporting, and integrations with premium job boards.
Customer Support from the Vendor. Hiring is time-sensitive, so reliable customer support is essential. If something breaks or you need help setting up workflows, will the vendor be there? Look at response times, support availability (24/7 or business hours?), and self-service resources like help centers or community forums. Stackfix rates each recruiting software on support quality—click into each product to see how they compare.

What are the common mistakes to avoid when buying Recruiting software?

Avoiding common pitfalls when choosing Recruiting software can save you time, money, and hiring headaches down the line. Here are some of the biggest mistakes startups make—and how to avoid them.

Choosing based on features, not usability. Some recruiting platforms have powerful features but a steep learning curve. Make sure you’re picking a tool that fits your team’s workflow, not just one with a long feature list.
Ignoring automation. Many startups still manage recruitment manually when automation could significantly reduce workload. Look for tools that automate job postings, candidate communications, and interview scheduling.
Overlooking collaboration features. Hiring is a team effort, and a lack of collaborative tools (like shared candidate feedback, scorecards, or hiring pipelines) can slow down decision-making.
Not planning for scaling. Startups often pick recruiting software based on current needs, without considering future growth. Will the platform support multiple job openings, hiring managers, and applicant sources as you scale?
Underestimating integration depth. A platform might claim to integrate with your HR software or email system, but does it sync real-time data properly? Always test integrations before committing to a tool.

How much does Recruiting Software typically cost?

Most recruiting solutions range from free to $700+ per month, with entry-level options starting around $70-100 and premium solutions exceeding $250 monthly. Most vendors structure pricing in tiers based on features and hiring volume, so be sure to enter your requirements as accurately as possible in our pricing calculator.

Many top-rated solutions (like Loxo, Breezy, and Zoho Recruit) offer free plans with core functionality, making it possible to start without investment.

For enterprise plans and above, you can expect to speak to sales for a bespoke price. These custom quotes typically factor in integration needs, hiring volume, and compliance requirements. To skip the demo calls, be sure to check out our pricing calculator.

Compare other Recruiting Software

View our comparisons of other Recruiting

Teamtailor vs Pinpoint

Ashby vs Join

Lever vs Recruitee

Workable vs BambooHR