logo
Search for anything...
About

Best Spellar Alternatives

Written by Camin McCluskey

Co-Founder & CTO

Edited by Steph Leung

Product & Operations Lead

Updated onMar 14, 2025
Spellar has emerged as a notable player in the meeting documentation and transcription space, offering AI-powered solutions for converting conversations into actionable insights. However, when compared to alternatives like Metaview, Fireflies.ai, Fathom, Otter.ai, and Grain, Spellar reveals significant limitations across several key use cases. For recruiting teams, Metaview delivers superior customization and analytics that Spellar lacks. Those seeking comprehensive meeting documentation will find Fireflies.ai’s powerful search capabilities and organization features outperform Spellar’s basic functionality. Teams requiring customizable templates and flexible editing options will appreciate Fathom’s extensive customization tools compared to Spellar’s rigid system. Sales organizations will benefit more from Otter.ai’s CRM integrations and keyword search than Spellar’s pronunciation-focused approach. Finally, for managing and sharing meeting content, Grain offers robust editing, organization, and sharing features that surpass Spellar’s limited offerings. This comparison explores why these alternatives provide more comprehensive solutions for specific business needs in 2025.

Best alternatives to Spellar

For recruiting and interview documentation:

Metaview product logo

Metaview

Stackfix Rating:

7.8 / 10

Metaview outperforms Spellar for recruiting and interview documentation with its superior customization, organization, and analytics capabilities. Highly customizable templates allow recruiters to format notes based on specific keywords and topics, and its advanced 'Views' feature enables filtering interviews by multiple criteria including topics discussed, participant details, and job stages. The platform’s side-by-side interview comparison tool accurately identifies common discussion points between candidates, and its engagement metrics provide detailed insights into interview performance. Unlike Spellar’s limited functionality, Metaview offers editable meeting notes, searchable transcripts, and 20+ integrations with major ATS platforms, making it a more comprehensive solution for recruitment teams.

Jump to product

For comprehensive meeting documentation and search:

Fireflies.ai product logo

Fireflies.ai

Stackfix Rating:

6.9 / 10

Fireflies.ai offers more comprehensive search capabilities and meeting documentation features than Spellar. Spellar lacks basic search functionality and folder organization, while Fireflies.ai provides powerful keyword search across all meetings, smart filters for sentiment analysis, and the ability to organize meetings into channels. Its meeting documentation is also superior, generating precise transcripts with editable notes and speaker tags, compared to Spellar’s non-editable transcripts and limited speaker tag editing. Additionally, Fireflies.ai enables users to bookmark key moments, add comments, and share specific meeting clips – features Spellar does not offer.

Jump to product

For customizable meeting notes and templates:

Fathom product logo

Fathom

Stackfix Rating:

6.9 / 10

Fathom is a strong alternative to Spellar for customizable meeting notes and templates, offering comprehensive editing capabilities and template options. While Spellar restricts users to basic AI-generated summaries with no editing functionality and only length adjustment options, Fathom provides nearly 15 customizable templates in its paid plan and allows users to create their own. This extensive customization is a significant advantage. Additionally, Fathom enables users to edit transcripts, modify speaker tags, and add custom-colored labels to sections of text – features absent in Spellar’s rigid system. For teams seeking flexible meeting documentation, Fathom’s robust customization tools are a better choice than Spellar’s limited offerings.

Jump to product

For sales team meeting documentation:

Otter.ai product logo

Otter.ai

Stackfix Rating:

6.0 / 10

Otter.ai excels at sales team meeting documentation through its advanced search capabilities, comprehensive integrations with CRM systems, and robust sharing features. While Spellar focuses primarily on pronunciation feedback, Otter.ai provides keyword search across meetings, direct integrations with Salesforce and HubSpot, and the ability to auto-share meeting notes with participants. Sales teams can easily organize meetings into folders and access notes through a web interface, making it more practical for managing customer conversations at scale.

Jump to product

For managing and sharing meeting content:

Grain product logo

Grain

Stackfix Rating:

8.6 / 10

Grain emerges as a compelling alternative to Spellar for managing and sharing meeting content through its comprehensive customization options, powerful search capabilities, and robust sharing features. While Spellar constrains users to basic AI summaries with no editing capabilities, Grain provides fully editable transcripts and notes, custom templates, and the ability to organize meetings into folders. Its advanced search functionality allows users to filter by speakers, topics, and dates, making it easy to locate specific information across all meetings. Additionally, Grain’s sharing features are more extensive, enabling users to automatically share notes with participants, create shareable clips, and export content in multiple formats.

Jump to product

CM

Meet your expert: Camin McCluskey

Stackfix Co-Founder & CTO

Having worked as a software engineer and CTO in enterprise and startup environments, I've been on both sides of the software buying journey. I'm excited to help you find the right software for your business, as well as supporting our partners to communicate what makes their software unique.

Spellar logo

Spellar

Metaview logo

Metaview

Fireflies.ai logo

Fireflies.ai

Fathom logo

Fathom

Otter.ai logo

Otter.ai

Grain logo

Grain

Our rating
Functionality
2

Functionality

2/10

<p>Spellar offers little beyond pronunciation feedback and lacks core functionality such as search, organization, note editing, and custom templates. This being said, its AI chat co-pilot and meeting summaries are strong features.</p>
8

Functionality

8/10

<p>It offers strong core AI notetaker functionality, capturing audio/video and providing insights through custom templates or its AI assistant. It also includes advanced features tailored for candidate interviews, such as side-by-side comparisons and detailed reporting on engagement and meeting stats.</p>
8

Functionality

8/10

<p>Offers the standard AI notetaking functionality - including recording on mobile app, global search &amp; AI chat across meetings. Meeting notes and transcripts are generally of high quality. Also has some additional functionality, such as conversation intelligence (analyse talk time distribution). However, the Chrome Extension that allowed users to record without a meeting bot is no longer available.</p>
9

Functionality

9/10

<p>Fathom is one of the most feature-rich AI notetakers we’ve reviewed—it took a while to test everything.</p><p><br></p><p>It’s clear why there’s a “Give Feedback” option in so many places throughout the app: if you’re trying to accomplish something, there’s a good chance Fathom has either already built it or optimised it for quick use.</p>
6

Functionality

6/10

<p>Mostly only offers core AI notetaking functionality. Can record, transcribe meetings, has a mobile app, can upload your own audio/ video files for transcript. But can't record without a meeting bot, lacks analytics, lacks more customisability for meeting notes &amp; other advanced AI functionality. AI chat functionality is surprisingly strong and accurate.</p>
8

Functionality

8/10

<p>Grain is well-rounded, offering all the functionality you'd expect from an AI notetaker. It simplifies managing your team, upcoming meetings, summary templates, playback, finding and organizing meeting information, and sharing with participants and team members. Every feature is carefully chosen, with no unnecessary functionality added.</p><p>The only notable missing feature is insights spanning multiple meetings.</p>
Ease of Use
4

Ease of Use

4/10

<p>Spellar’s limited functionality makes it straightforward to set up, transcribe meetings, and get clear feedback on your pronunciation. The feedback looks good and clearly highlights both your mistakes and the correct alternatives. However, the lack of features like meeting search, organization tools, or note customization makes it difficult to go beyond the basics.</p>
8

Ease of Use

8/10

<p>It’s easy to set up and use. The custom templates are simple to configure, and the summary can be regenerated with a single click. The assistant offers good controls to customise the output format. Interview comparisons are easy to view by selecting two interviews, and the "Views" are straightforward to set up for generating interview reports.</p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Key workflows such as recording meetings, inviting the bot to meetings is generally intuitive and straightforward. Especially on the paid tier, where you can see at a glance all the action items from your meetings. There are some unmarked elements / icons over the web app which will take a bit of getting used to. The UX of beta AI features is also underwhelming e.g When searching across meetings, you're only able to ask AI assistant question one-by-one, instead of asking follow up questions.</p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Although Fathom offers a ton of features, it does an excellent job of onboarding users with demo and explanation videos. There isn’t a mountain of settings to configure and learn before getting started—everything is either well-explained or easy to understand.</p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Key workflows such as recording meetings, inviting the bot to meetings is generally intuitive and straightforward. You can see action items assigned to you at a glance. There are some unmarked elements / icons over the web app which will take a bit of getting used to. Some flows, such as organising meeting notes, aren't as user-friendly as they can be.</p>
9

Ease of Use

9/10

<p>Setting up with Grain is extremely easy, and its core functionality is intuitive. Users can choose how deeply they want to engage with the platform. If they stick to the core features, they won’t be overwhelmed by additional functionality, as advanced features are typically well-hidden in settings and can be accessed only when needed.</p>
Look and feel
3

Look and feel

3/10

<p>The interface is clean and simple, but the absence of tags, colors, and a keyword search makes organization difficult and finding things challenging. Additionally, the mandatory dark mode feels overly dark, making it hard to see. On the positive side, the feature that highlights mispronounced words in the transcript is a nice touch. If your primary goal is to get feedback on pronunciation, the app serves that purpose fairly well.</p>
8

Look and feel

8/10

<p>The user interface is polished and well-designed, avoiding feature overload on any page. Notes and transcripts can be viewed side by side, making efficient use of space to display notes, video, and transcript together. The comparisons page is tidy, presenting side-by-side comparisons clearly by keeping the topic on one line with the two comparisons displayed below. The "Views" page is well-organised, with filters at the top, results displayed compactly, and charts neatly arranged on the side.</p>
5

Look and feel

5/10

<p>Modern and visually acceptable. But the amount of AI features/ Ask Fred that appear upon hover can be quite distracting. Page loads can be slow (3-5 seconds) when clicking into meeting notes, waiting for AI response takes up to 10 seconds, but that's to be expected.</p>
4

Look and feel

4/10

<p>Fathom’s extensive feature set comes at a cost—everywhere you move your mouse, a tooltip appears, or there’s an option to click something. This can get overwhelming when you’re just trying to accomplish simple tasks.</p><p>During setup and early use, they heavily promote their “Point” system (feedback in exchange for points) and frequently send feedback emails and questions, which can become a bit intrusive.</p>
6

Look and feel

6/10

<p>Modern, clean and visually acceptable. Functional design, nothing spectacular. Page loads are acceptable (2-3 seconds).</p>
9

Look and feel

9/10

<p>Grain is exceptionally polished, offering rich functionality without overwhelming the interface with unnecessary detail. Finding what you need is easy thanks to its powerful search. Within meetings, you can view the recording and notes in three templates, each designed for:</p><ul><li>Reviewing calls and coaching</li><li>Navigating and searching calls</li><li>Creating clips</li></ul><p>There’s a good balance between quick-access features and more advanced settings, with only essential elements displayed on the page. Even the AI assistant is tucked behind a button that opens a pop-up when pressed, keeping the interface streamlined overall.</p>
Customisability
1

Customisability

1/10

<p>Beyond choosing the length of the AI summary, customisation options are virtually non-existent. You cannot manually edit the transcript or notes, create custom templates, or organise meetings into folders, leaving you restricted to a chronological order.</p>
9

Customisability

9/10

<p>The templates offer detailed control over how summaries are generated, allowing custom setups for identified topics. Both the summaries and AI assistant responses are highly customisable. The "Views" page provides advanced filtering options and extensive control over creating reports, making it easy to find meetings based on topics discussed and other criteria.</p>
6

Customisability

6/10

<p>You can freely edit meeting notes and transcripts, and organise your meeting notes into channels. However, the only major let down is you're unable to set up custom meeting note templates. Though you are able choose from a large selection of templates.</p>
8

Customisability

8/10

<p>Fathom provides control over many aspects of the transcript, summary notes, speaker tags, and highlighting. If other AI notetakers often mis-transcribe or misidentify speakers without allowing edits, Fathom could be the solution for you.</p>
4

Customisability

4/10

<p>You can freely edit transcripts and most of the meeting notes. Annoyingly, you're unable to edit meeting summary - there's only an option to regenerate it. You're also unable to customise sections of meeting notes or bring your custom templates.</p>
9

Customisability

9/10

<p>Grain is highly customizable at every stage, including:</p><ul><li>Fully editable transcripts, both in text and speakers.</li><li>Notes that can be regenerated with a different template, and the ability to create custom templates. AI assistant answers can be added to notes and templates with a single click.</li><li>Comments can be left on notes, and highlights can be created, with both displayed separately.</li><li>Clips can be merged into stories, and meetings can be grouped into playlists.</li><li>Tags can be added to meetings, and custom trackers set up to track specific topics—by both single words and multi-word phrases.</li><li>Custom words can be added for improved recognition in transcripts.</li></ul>
Ease of Setup
7

Ease of Setup

7/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. No editable note templates or customization. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. No advanced workflows supported, no Zapier templates or native builder. Requires desktop app installation.</p>
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Easy setup for ATS, Calendly, and calendar integrations. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Native workflow builder is intuitive, enabling advanced workflows in&nbsp;30-40 minutes.</p>
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Over 70 editable note templates with guided creation. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows are seamless with native integrations and a rich library of Zapier templates, taking&nbsp;just 30-40 minutes.</p>
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Provides 15 note templates, customizable but without guided input creation. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows require Zapier but lack a rich library of Zapier templates, taking&nbsp;1-2 hours.</p>
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. No note templates. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. No advanced workflows supported, no Zapier templates or native builder.</p>
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Handful of note templates with guided input creation for sections. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows via Zapier take&nbsp;30-40 minutes&nbsp;because there is a rich library of predefined templates.</p>
Customer Support
4

Customer Support

4/10

<p>There’s no help centre with self-help articles or an in-app support chat. Support is available via a Slack channel, where questions typically receive a response within a few hours.</p>
6

Customer Support

6/10

<p>Has a great Help Centre with a search feature for in-depth self-help articles. Support is available via email, with responses typically within 24 hours.</p>
6

Customer Support

6/10

<p>Help centre was of decent quality and depth, offering step by step instructions. Offers personalised live chat with an AI chatbot. It was relatively quick to be connected with a human agent (within minutes), however, the help we were offered wasn't the most helpful, with irrelevant help centre articles provided.</p>
8

Customer Support

8/10

<p>They offer an FAQ help centre and the option to send messages directly on their website. We received responses within a few minutes at best, and within a couple of hours at worst, though replies can take up to 24 hours. They answered our questions thoroughly and provided additional details for reassurance.</p>
4

Customer Support

4/10

<p>Otter has an AI chatbot on their site. However, you'll have to submit a ticket to get in touch with support. When testing on the free tier, we found ourselves hanging for several days without a reply.</p>
8

Customer Support

8/10

<p>You can book a live demo, and there’s a Guides &amp; Resources page with over 100 articles.</p><p>Additionally, in-app chat support is available, with human agents typically responding within a few minutes.</p>
Integratability
3

Integratability

3/10

<p>Integrates with some common apps like Slack, Notion, and Jira. The biggest weakness is the lack of a Zapier integration, which most AI notetakers have.</p>
6

Integratability

6/10

<p>It integrates with major scheduling tools like Calendly, Google Calendar, and Outlook, as well as ATS platforms such as Ashby, Greenhouse, and Lever, among others. Some Zapier integrations are also available.</p>
8

Integratability

8/10

<p>Offers good integrations with most reasonably relevant third party tools e.g. CRM, project management tool, applicant tracking systems which allows you to automatically push meeting notes and action items into those systems. Also offers an API for custom integrations.</p>
4

Integratability

4/10

<p>Fathom doesn’t integrate with many other software platforms, but it covers the main ones.</p>
3

Integratability

3/10

<p>Otter.ai only offers a handful of integrations with the most popular 3rd party tools e.g. Slack, Google Docs, Salesforce, Pipedrive. It lacks any integrations with project management tools or applicant tracking system, It also lacks an API for custom integrations.</p>
9

Integratability

9/10

<p>Grain integrates with most major software and offers ready-made, tested Zapier templates for Notion, Google Drive, Cardinal, Trello, and others.</p><p>The app features a native "Deals" section that lets you track deal status, risks, and momentum in one place when connected to HubSpot.</p><p>Recordings, transcripts, notes, and meeting metadata can also be integrated with any platform via the Grain API.</p>
Ease of Migration
6

Ease of Migration

6/10

<p>The summary notes can be quickly shared to integrated apps like Google Docs, Craft, Notion, and Confluence. There are also options to copy the notes to the clipboard, copy all as plain text, copy only the summary, or copy the summary as plain text. Additionally, the audio recording can be downloaded as an .mp4 file.</p>
6

Ease of Migration

6/10

<p>Meetings and "Views" (their version of reports) can be shared via email or link with access controls. Notes and transcripts can be copied, transcripts can be downloaded as PDFs, and video recordings are also available for download.</p>
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>You're able to download transcript, meeting summaries and audio in various formats. For transcripts, you can also include timestamp and speaker names.</p>
9

Ease of Migration

9/10

<p>Fathom allows you to share a meeting recording via a link and control access, including the ability to revoke an attendee's access to play the recording after sharing. You can download the video recordings too.</p><p>The “Copy Follow-up Email” button is very handy after short meetings.</p><p>For the action items, it offers specific “Copy for…” options for Asana, Google Docs, Gmail, Todoist, and Microsoft Word, ensuring links and formatting are optimized for each platform. This feature is also available for summaries, with options for Google Docs, Gmail, Notion, and Microsoft Word.</p>
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>You're able to download transcript, meeting summaries and audio in various formats. For transcripts, you can also include timestamp and speaker names.</p>
10

Ease of Migration

10/10

<p>Meeting recaps can be automatically shared with workspace members, participants from your team domain(s) or all meeting participants.</p><p>Individual meetings can be shared via a link, with access revocable at any time. You can also include a description and start the meeting at a selected timestamp.</p><p>Clips from the meeting can be added to a story and shared together. Additionally, there’s an option to copy the embed iframe. The meeting recording can be downloaded, and the transcript can be exported in .pdf, .srt, .vtt, or .docx format.</p>

Metaview: Spellar alternative for recruiting and interview documentation

Metaview product logo
Metaview

Stackfix Rating:

7.8 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

$0

Calculate your price
Updated onMar 14, 2025
Metaview outperforms Spellar for recruiting and interview documentation with its superior customization, organization, and analytics capabilities. Highly customizable templates allow recruiters to format notes based on specific keywords and topics, and its advanced 'Views' feature enables filtering interviews by multiple criteria including topics discussed, participant details, and job stages. The platform’s side-by-side interview comparison tool accurately identifies common discussion points between candidates, and its engagement metrics provide detailed insights into interview performance. Unlike Spellar’s limited functionality, Metaview offers editable meeting notes, searchable transcripts, and 20+ integrations with major ATS platforms, making it a more comprehensive solution for recruitment teams.

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of Spellar vs. Metaview.

Pros

  • Exceptional engagement tracking and analytics

  • Highly customizable templates

  • Polished and intuitive interface

  • Advanced meeting search and filtering

  • Robust AI note generation

Cons

  • Limited Keyword Search Functionality

  • No Mobile App for In-Person Meetings

  • No Direct Folder Organization

  • Limited Free Tier

Compare all AI notetakersRead the full review

Fathom: Spellar alternative for customizable meeting notes and templates

Fathom product logo
Fathom

Stackfix Rating:

6.9 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

$0

Calculate your price
Updated onMar 14, 2025
Fathom is a strong alternative to Spellar for customizable meeting notes and templates, offering comprehensive editing capabilities and template options. While Spellar restricts users to basic AI-generated summaries with no editing functionality and only length adjustment options, Fathom provides nearly 15 customizable templates in its paid plan and allows users to create their own. This extensive customization is a significant advantage. Additionally, Fathom enables users to edit transcripts, modify speaker tags, and add custom-colored labels to sections of text – features absent in Spellar’s rigid system. For teams seeking flexible meeting documentation, Fathom’s robust customization tools are a better choice than Spellar’s limited offerings.

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of Spellar vs. Fathom.

Pros

  • Exceptional Transcription Accuracy and Editing

  • Powerful Search and Navigation Features

  • Robust Export and Sharing Options

  • Feature-Rich AI Note Generation

Cons

  • Limited Integration Capabilities

  • Limited File Upload Functionality

  • Poor User Interface Design

  • No Mobile Recording Capabilities

  • No discreet recording option

Compare all AI notetakersRead the full review

Otter.ai: Spellar alternative for sales team meeting documentation

Otter.ai product logo
Otter.ai

Stackfix Rating:

6.0 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

$0

Calculate your price
Updated onMar 14, 2025
Otter.ai excels at sales team meeting documentation through its advanced search capabilities, comprehensive integrations with CRM systems, and robust sharing features. While Spellar focuses primarily on pronunciation feedback, Otter.ai provides keyword search across meetings, direct integrations with Salesforce and HubSpot, and the ability to auto-share meeting notes with participants. Sales teams can easily organize meetings into folders and access notes through a web interface, making it more practical for managing customer conversations at scale.

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of Spellar vs. Otter.ai.

Pros

  • Robust Export Capabilities

  • Powerful AI Chat Assistant

Cons

  • Poor Transcript Accuracy

  • Subpar Customer Support

  • Limited Customization Options

  • Poor Integration Capabilities

  • Highly Restrictive Free Tier

Compare all AI notetakersRead the full review

Grain: Spellar alternative for managing and sharing meeting content

Grain product logo
Grain

Stackfix Rating:

8.6 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

$0

Calculate your price
Updated onMar 14, 2025
Grain emerges as a compelling alternative to Spellar for managing and sharing meeting content through its comprehensive customization options, powerful search capabilities, and robust sharing features. While Spellar constrains users to basic AI summaries with no editing capabilities, Grain provides fully editable transcripts and notes, custom templates, and the ability to organize meetings into folders. Its advanced search functionality allows users to filter by speakers, topics, and dates, making it easy to locate specific information across all meetings. Additionally, Grain’s sharing features are more extensive, enabling users to automatically share notes with participants, create shareable clips, and export content in multiple formats.

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of Spellar vs. Grain.

Pros

  • Superior Transcription Control

  • Exceptional User Interface and Experience

  • Powerful Search and Organization Features

  • Comprehensive Export and Integration Options

  • Highly Customizable Platform

Cons

  • No mobile recording capability

  • No weekly email summaries

  • No cross-meeting AI insights

  • Limited task management integration

  • No discreet recording option

Compare all AI notetakersRead the full review

How we test products

With AI Notetaking tools becoming increasingly essential for businesses, we focus on identifying the best options for small and midsize teams. Our evaluation process reflects real-world usage, prioritizing functionality, ease of use, and overall value. Here’s how we do it:

Functionality

AI Notetaking software should do more than just transcribe—it should capture key insights, summarize discussions, and enhance productivity. We start by identifying key use cases—meeting transcription, summarization, action item extraction, and collaboration—then test how well each platform delivers on these needs. Tools that provide high accuracy and useful summaries without unnecessary complexity score highest.

User Experience & Onboarding

A great AI Notetaking tool should be intuitive and frictionless. We test each platform’s interface by navigating core features without prior training and track onboarding time—from account setup to first meeting capture. Platforms that require extensive setup or manual adjustments lose points.

Accuracy & AI Capabilities

AI-powered transcription and summarization must be reliable. We evaluate speech-to-text accuracy, language understanding, and summarization quality. We also test whether AI-generated action items and key takeaways are actually useful or just generic outputs.

Integrations & Compatibility

AI Notetaking tools should work seamlessly with video conferencing platforms, project management software, and CRMs. We test how well each tool integrates with essential business systems and assess whether native integrations or third-party connectors are required.

Pricing & Value

We compare pricing across competitors, analyzing what each plan includes and whether critical features are locked behind paywalls. Hidden costs—such as per-minute transcription fees, premium AI features, or required enterprise plans—are factored into our assessment. Platforms that offer strong core functionality at a fair price score highest.

Stackfix’s Fit Score

All of these factors contribute to Stackfix’s Fit Score, a proprietary ranking system that measures how well each AI Notetaking tool aligns with a buyer’s needs. It combines two key elements:

  • Requirements Met – How many buyer requirements the software fulfills
  • Stackfix Rating – Our expert assessment of the software’s overall quality, usability, and value

The result? A clear, data-driven recommendation that helps businesses choose the right AI Notetaking software—without hours of trial and error.

FAQs

What is an AI Notetaker?

An AI notetaker is a tool that automatically transcribes, summarizes, and organizes meeting notes, helping individuals and teams capture key insights without manual effort. These platforms use AI-powered speech recognition and natural language processing (NLP) to turn conversations into structured, searchable notes—making it easier to recall action items, decisions, and important discussions. The key features of an AI notetaker usually include:

  • Real-Time Transcription: AI-powered tools that capture and transcribe meetings in real time, ensuring accuracy across different accents, languages, and speaking styles.
  • Summarization & Action Items: AI-generated meeting summaries, key takeaways, and action items to help users quickly digest discussions without reviewing full transcripts.
  • Speaker Identification: Ability to differentiate speakers and attribute statements correctly, making transcripts more readable and actionable.
  • Collaboration & Sharing: Easy sharing of meeting notes, highlights, and recordings with team members via integrations with email, Slack, or project management tools.
  • Search & Organization: AI-powered keyword detection, tagging, and smart search to help users quickly find relevant past discussions and decisions.

What should I consider when buying an AI notetaker?

Choosing the right AI notetaker can transform how you capture, organize, and act on information—so it’s essential to find one that fits your workflow, integrations, and budget. Here are the key factors to consider before making your decision.

  1. Your Use Case. Start by identifying how you’ll use the AI notetaker. Do you need a tool for team meetings, customer calls, brainstorming sessions, or legal/compliance documentation? Different platforms specialize in different areas, so choosing one tailored to your needs ensures better accuracy and relevant features.
  2. Ease of Use. An AI notetaker should simplify workflows, not add complexity. Look for a tool that’s easy to set up, requires minimal training, and integrates smoothly with your existing tools. Platforms that require manual corrections or frequent troubleshooting will slow you down.
  3. Integration with Your Workflow. Your AI notetaker should fit seamlessly into your workflow. If you use Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Slack, or Notion, check whether the tool offers native integrations or requires manual workarounds. A good AI notetaker should automatically sync notes with project management, CRM, or documentation tools.
  4. Summarization & AI Quality. Not all AI-generated summaries are equal. Some tools produce concise, high-quality summaries, while others generate long, unstructured text that still requires manual editing. Test how well the AI captures key points, assigns action items, and differentiates between general discussion and critical decisions.
  5. Scalability & Collaboration. If you’re using an AI notetaker for a growing team, ensure it supports multiple users, shared workspaces, and role-based permissions. The best tools allow for collaborative editing, team comments, and centralized access to past notes.
  6. Pricing & Hidden Costs. AI notetaker pricing varies based on transcription limits, team seats, storage, and premium AI features. Check for hidden costs, such as:
  7. Limits on meeting hours per month
  8. Extra fees for advanced AI-generated summaries
  9. Costs for exporting transcripts or integrating with premium tools
  10. Storage limits and add-ons for long-term transcript access
  11. Customer Support & Reliability. Since AI notetakers handle critical business meetings, fast and reliable support is important. Check if the vendor offers 24/7 chat support, email response times, and self-service knowledge bases. A downtime-prone or buggy AI tool can result in lost notes and frustration.

What are the common mistakes to avoid when choosing an AI notetaker?

Avoiding common pitfalls when selecting an AI notetaker can save you time, frustration, and missed insights. Here are some of the biggest mistakes teams make - and how to avoid them.

  1. Prioritizing price over accuracy. A cheap AI notetaker with poor transcription quality will cost you more time in manual corrections than a premium tool with high accuracy.
  2. Assuming all integrations work flawlessly. Some tools claim to integrate with Zoom, Slack, or CRMs, but may require manual exports or unreliable third-party connectors. Always test integrations.
  3. Overlooking search functionality. If you plan to reference old meeting notes, look for a tool with advanced search, keyword tagging, and filters. Poor search capabilities make finding past discussions difficult.
  4. Ignoring privacy & security. AI notetakers handle sensitive business conversations, so check data encryption, compliance certifications (GDPR, SOC 2), and storage policies.
  5. Choosing a tool that doesn’t scale. A notetaker that works well for a solo user may not support team-wide collaboration, shared notes, or enterprise compliance features.


How much does AI Notetaking Software typically cost?

Most AI notetaker solutions range from $10-75 per user monthly, with entry-level options starting around $10-20 and premium solutions exceeding $75 monthly. Most vendors structure pricing in tiers based on features and meeting volume, so be sure to enter your requirements as accurately as possible in our pricing calculator.

Many providers offer free plans with core functionality for personal use and very small teams but restrict meeting length (typically 15-30 minutes), transcription hours (2-5 hours monthly), or available features. Otter, Fireflies, and Notion AI all provide capable free tiers that can handle basic note-taking needs without cost. For personal users who only need occasional meeting notes, these free tiers are often sufficient.

The free tier trend is particularly strong in this market, with most major players offering a no-cost entry point to attract individual users who may later upgrade or bring the tool into their workplace. While these free versions typically limit advanced features like custom AI analysis, speaker identification, or integration capabilities, they provide enough functionality for personal productivity.

For enterprise plans and above, you can expect to speak to sales for a bespoke price. These custom quotes typically factor in integration needs, security requirements, and user volume discounts. To skip the demo calls, be sure to check out our pricing calculator.

Compare other AI Notetakers

View our comparisons of other AI Notetaking

SG

Supernormal vs Granola

BK

Bluedot vs Krisp

RAt

Read AI vs tl;dv

SS

Spellar vs Spiky