logo
Search for anything...
About

Best tl;dv Alternatives

Written by Camin McCluskey

Co-Founder & CTO

Edited by Steph Leung

Product & Operations Lead

Updated onMar 14, 2025
In today's fast-paced business environment, effective meeting management has become essential for productivity and collaboration. tl;dv has emerged as a popular meeting assistant tool that helps teams capture, transcribe, and organize their virtual meetings. However, as organizations face diverse challenges—from enterprise security compliance to recording in-person conversations—many are exploring alternatives that might better address their specific needs. While tl;dv offers solid functionality for basic meeting recording and transcription, specialized alternatives excel in particular areas: Supernormal offers enhanced security credentials, Fireflies.ai enables mobile recording capabilities, Krisp delivers superior audio quality management, Read AI provides comprehensive engagement analytics, and Otter.ai offers unmatched transcript editing flexibility. This comparison explores how these alternatives stack up against tl;dv across critical use cases, helping teams identify the optimal solution for their unique meeting management requirements.

Best alternatives to tl;dv

For enterprise security compliance:

Supernormal product logo

Supernormal

Stackfix Rating:

6.4 / 10

Supernormal stands out as a more secure alternative to tl;dv for enterprise security compliance due to its SOC 2 Type II certification. While both platforms offer GDPR compliance, Supernormal’s additional SOC 2 Type II compliance demonstrates a commitment to data security controls, risk management, and privacy protection. This certification is particularly crucial for enterprises handling sensitive meeting data, as it verifies rigorous security practices and regular third-party audits. tl;dv’s lack of SOC 2 Type II compliance may present compliance challenges for organizations with strict security requirements.

Jump to product

For recording in-person meetings:

Fireflies.ai product logo

Fireflies.ai

Stackfix Rating:

6.9 / 10

Fireflies.ai stands out for recording in-person meetings through its dedicated mobile app that offers one-click transcription. While tl;dv lacks mobile recording capabilities entirely, Fireflies.ai enables users to easily capture and transcribe face-to-face conversations with impressive accuracy, even for speakers with accents. The mobile app seamlessly integrates with Fireflies.ai’s core features, allowing users to access transcripts, generate meeting notes, and share content just as they would with virtual meetings.

Jump to product

For managing audio quality:

Krisp product logo

Krisp

Stackfix Rating:

6.1 / 10

While tl;dv offers basic audio management features, Krisp stands out with its superior audio quality control capabilities in three key areas. First, Krisp’s noise cancellation technology effectively removes background noise, voices, and echoes for all users. Second, its transcription accuracy provides highly accurate speech-to-text conversion with editable speaker tags. Finally, enterprise users benefit from advanced features like AI Accent Localization, which automatically converts accents in real-time to match the listener’s native accent, and real-time translation capabilities. In contrast, tl;dv’s audio features are more limited, with moderately accurate transcriptions and no ability to edit speaker tags or transcripts.

Jump to product

For tracking meeting engagement metrics:

Read AI product logo

Read AI

Stackfix Rating:

5.5 / 10

Read AI offers a more comprehensive alternative for tracking meeting engagement metrics than tl;dv. While tl;dv provides basic metrics like talk time and filler words, Read AI delivers deeper insights with advanced engagement tracking. It measures attention levels, sentiment analysis, charisma impact, and participant bias – metrics tl;dv doesn’t offer. Read AI also analyzes engagement patterns across multiple meetings, offering intelligent recommendations such as identifying low-contributing participants and suggesting meeting invite adjustments. Furthermore, Read AI’s automatic pre-meeting briefings and post-meeting recaps help maintain consistent engagement tracking, unlike tl;dv’s more basic reporting system.

Jump to product

For maintaining accurate transcripts:

Otter.ai product logo

Otter.ai

Stackfix Rating:

6.0 / 10

While tl;dv provides transcriptions, Otter.ai is preferred for transcript management due to its powerful editing features. Unlike tl;dv, which restricts transcript modifications, Otter.ai empowers users to edit both transcript text and speaker labels. This editing flexibility is essential for correcting AI transcription nuances, especially with technical terminology or diverse speech patterns. Moreover, Otter.ai’s transcripts include precise timestamps and clearly distinguished speakers, facilitating seamless navigation and long-term transcript precision.

Jump to product

CM

Meet your expert: Camin McCluskey

Stackfix Co-Founder & CTO

Having worked as a software engineer and CTO in enterprise and startup environments, I've been on both sides of the software buying journey. I'm excited to help you find the right software for your business, as well as supporting our partners to communicate what makes their software unique.

tl;dv logo

tl;dv

Supernormal logo

Supernormal

Fireflies.ai logo

Fireflies.ai

Krisp logo

Krisp

Read AI logo

Read AI

Otter.ai logo

Otter.ai

Our rating
Functionality
7

Functionality

7/10

<p>One standout feature of tl;dv is its ability to analyse multiple meetings, which it does better than some other AI notetakers we've tested. However, it's still limited to summarising content from the transcripts and can't handle questions about anything not mentioned in them, although this data is available through a separate feature outside of the meeting notes.</p><p><br></p><p>The option to set up recurring reports for this analysis adds even more value. The search functionality is powerful, though sometimes slow, and there’s a lot that can be automated through their ready-made Zapier integrations. However, the inability to edit the transcript or speaker labels is a significant drawback.</p>
5

Functionality

5/10

<p>Mostly offers core AI notetaking functionality: recording and transcribing meetings, uploading your own audio/video files for transcripts, but lacks a mobile app. It can't record without a meeting bot, lacks analytics, and its custom agents are still in early stages of development.</p>
8

Functionality

8/10

<p>Offers the standard AI notetaking functionality - including recording on mobile app, global search &amp; AI chat across meetings. Meeting notes and transcripts are generally of high quality. Also has some additional functionality, such as conversation intelligence (analyse talk time distribution). However, the Chrome Extension that allowed users to record without a meeting bot is no longer available.</p>
6

Functionality

6/10

<p>Krisp offers excellent features like accent localisation and real-time translation, though these are limited to Enterprise-level plans. It lacks an AI assistant and the ability to use custom templates for AI summaries. While its noise cancellation is outstanding for audio recording, its video recording capabilities are limited. Currently, it only supports screen recording or video capture via a bot on Zoom.</p>
7

Functionality

7/10

<p>Read’s functionality focuses on speech analysis, offering tools to evaluate engagement and the impact of speech on others. It provides great summaries across multiple conversations to keep you informed. However, it lacks options to customise AI insights or edit key moments in meetings, and there is no AI assistant to answer questions or expand on specific insights.</p>
6

Functionality

6/10

<p>Mostly only offers core AI notetaking functionality. Can record, transcribe meetings, has a mobile app, can upload your own audio/ video files for transcript. But can't record without a meeting bot, lacks analytics, lacks more customisability for meeting notes &amp; other advanced AI functionality. AI chat functionality is surprisingly strong and accurate.</p>
Ease of Use
6

Ease of Use

6/10

<p>Meetings are easy to set up with tl;dv, and there’s a low learning curve. Recording meetings is simple, and analysing them is straightforward, as you can hover over the recording to view AI insights. Notes can be regenerated in different templates, or more insights can be generated with the help of the AI assistant. The assistant also makes it easy to select multiple meetings for insights or set up recurring reports for them.</p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Key workflows, like recording meetings and inviting the bot, are intuitive and straightforward, with the Chrome extension providing added convenience. However, the "Invite" buttons in the web app can be confusing at first—one is for inviting the bot to meetings, and the other is for inviting users to the app.</p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Key workflows such as recording meetings, inviting the bot to meetings is generally intuitive and straightforward. Especially on the paid tier, where you can see at a glance all the action items from your meetings. There are some unmarked elements / icons over the web app which will take a bit of getting used to. The UX of beta AI features is also underwhelming e.g When searching across meetings, you're only able to ask AI assistant question one-by-one, instead of asking follow up questions.</p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Setting up Krisp is quick and straightforward, with its core functionality being highly intuitive. The menu bar app allows you to transcribe meetings, record audio, or capture the screen, and the rest is handled in the background.</p>
5

Ease of Use

5/10

<p>Read has a high learning curve, largely due to its extensive speech analysis tools and unique suggestions, such as recommending meeting skips or removing low-contributing participants. It can take time to get used to the navigation, particularly if you prefer simpler, more condensed summaries.</p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Key workflows such as recording meetings, inviting the bot to meetings is generally intuitive and straightforward. You can see action items assigned to you at a glance. There are some unmarked elements / icons over the web app which will take a bit of getting used to. Some flows, such as organising meeting notes, aren't as user-friendly as they can be.</p>
Look and feel
4

Look and feel

4/10

<p>tl;dv is packed with features, but the application isn’t designed in a particularly clean way, often leading to visual bugs. For example, the transcript's word highlighting is difficult to follow, the free tier is cluttered with "upgrade to get ______" prompts, and the spacing and sizing are inconsistent throughout the app.</p>
5

Look and feel

5/10

<p>The design is clean and modern but simple, with a functional layout—nothing spectacular. Page load times are decent (2-3 seconds). There were occasional error pages, and the AI agents were temporarily down during testing, but since they were in BETA, it's understandable. Trying to open information on their website help pages sometimes annoyingly redirects you to the web app if you're signed in.</p>
5

Look and feel

5/10

<p>Modern and visually acceptable. But the amount of AI features/ Ask Fred that appear upon hover can be quite distracting. Page loads can be slow (3-5 seconds) when clicking into meeting notes, waiting for AI response takes up to 10 seconds, but that's to be expected.</p>
9

Look and feel

9/10

<p>Krisp has a modern, polished design that ensures easy navigation, supported by a powerful search feature. The playback interface is excellent, featuring word highlighting and colour-coded player bars for each speaker.</p><p><br></p><p>It balances quick-access features with advanced options, which are neatly tucked away in menus or settings buttons. Essential elements are prioritised, keeping the layout clean and uncluttered. The home page displays key meeting details, including the participants, date, and whether it includes audio, video, or notes—information often absent from other AI notetakers' dashboards.</p>
4

Look and feel

4/10

<p>Read's interface is modern but somewhat overloaded with features, similar to Fathom. Information is duplicated in the report, such as action items appearing in both the notes on the left and the highlights on the right. During testing, we found ourselves frequently scrolling between sections, whereas other AI notetakers use better design and spacing to present information more clearly.</p>
6

Look and feel

6/10

<p>Modern, clean and visually acceptable. Functional design, nothing spectacular. Page loads are acceptable (2-3 seconds).</p>
Customisability
6

Customisability

6/10

<p>With the ability to create custom templates and recurring AI reports that summarise meetings based on specific criteria, tl;dv is already ahead of some AI notetakers. The recorder bot's name and profile picture can be customised, though these are features available only on the paid plan. Additionally, you can customise when the meeting recording will be shared and choose whether to notify external participants new to tl;dv that the meeting will be recorded.</p>
8

Customisability

8/10

<p>For summary notes: You can customise your summary template and arrange sections in any order. You can also create your own summary types, eliminating the need to ask the AI assistant the same questions each time.</p><p><br></p><p>For custom agents: Customise the agent’s name, theme, and the questions it will ask during the interview.</p>
6

Customisability

6/10

<p>You can freely edit meeting notes and transcripts, and organise your meeting notes into channels. However, the only major let down is you're unable to set up custom meeting note templates. Though you are able choose from a large selection of templates.</p>
3

Customisability

3/10

<p>The ability to edit the transcript and speaker(s) is useful, but other features are lacking:</p><ul><li>No custom templates</li><li>Can't add comments to notes or the transcript</li><li>Can't tag meetings with codes</li><li>No tools for creating clips or playlists</li><li>No customisation for the meeting bot</li></ul>
3

Customisability

3/10

<p>Read offers many AI insights, but customisation options are limited. You can't modify the template for summaries, action items, or key questions, and the trailer/highlights generated for meeting recordings can't be customised. Even the tags on reports are limited to a selection of auto-generated options.</p>
4

Customisability

4/10

<p>You can freely edit transcripts and most of the meeting notes. Annoyingly, you're unable to edit meeting summary - there's only an option to regenerate it. You're also unable to customise sections of meeting notes or bring your custom templates.</p>
Ease of Setup
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Few editable note templates, guided input boxes for creating custom templates. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows require Zapier but lack a rich library of Zapier templates, taking&nbsp;1-2 hours.</p>
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Provides note templates and guided input boxes for creating custom ones. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows takes&nbsp;30-40 minutes&nbsp;due to a rich library of Zapier templates. Comes with some predefined agents for interviewing and setting up new agents takes 10-15 minutes.</p>
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Over 70 editable note templates with guided creation. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows are seamless with native integrations and a rich library of Zapier templates, taking&nbsp;just 30-40 minutes.</p>
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>Self-serve for basic tiers; enterprise setup requires booking a demo and may take several days/weeks to get set up. No note templates; requires desktop app installation. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows require Zapier but lack a rich library of Zapier templates, taking&nbsp;1-2 hours.</p>
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Provides AI insights but no custom note templates. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows require Zapier but lack a rich library of Zapier templates, taking&nbsp;1-2 hours.</p>
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. No note templates. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. No advanced workflows supported, no Zapier templates or native builder.</p>
Customer Support
5

Customer Support

5/10

<p>It has an in-app chat for support, but it doesn’t offer 24/7 assistance, and it can take up to a day to receive a response from a human agent. Additionally, there are over 100 self-help articles available in the FAQs.</p>
6

Customer Support

6/10

<p>An AI-powered chatbot with the option to message support. Typically, a real person replies within a few hours, but it can take up to 48 hours in some cases.</p>
6

Customer Support

6/10

<p>Help centre was of decent quality and depth, offering step by step instructions. Offers personalised live chat with an AI chatbot. It was relatively quick to be connected with a human agent (within minutes), however, the help we were offered wasn't the most helpful, with irrelevant help centre articles provided.</p>
5

Customer Support

5/10

<p>The help centre provides detailed explanations for common questions, including setup and integration guides. The chatbot only allows ticket submissions, with no option to speak to a human agent, and responses are typically provided within 24 hours.</p>
5

Customer Support

5/10

<p>A contact form is available on their page, along with a searchable FAQ section. Usual replies are within 24 hours.</p>
4

Customer Support

4/10

<p>Otter has an AI chatbot on their site. However, you'll have to submit a ticket to get in touch with support. When testing on the free tier, we found ourselves hanging for several days without a reply.</p>
Integratability
9

Integratability

9/10

<p>It integrates with most major software and offers an extensive list of ready-made Zapier templates for platforms it doesn’t natively support.</p><p><br></p><p>Additionally, it can be integrated with other tools through its tl;dv API, though this feature is only available on the Enterprise plan.</p>
6

Integratability

6/10

<p>Supernormal offers useful integrations with a wide range of 3rd party tools e.g. Slack, Google Docs, Salesforce, Pipedrive. It has integrations with project management tools like ClickUp and Linear, lacks integrations with applicant tracking systems and doesn't have an API for custom integrations.</p>
8

Integratability

8/10

<p>Offers good integrations with most reasonably relevant third party tools e.g. CRM, project management tool, applicant tracking systems which allows you to automatically push meeting notes and action items into those systems. Also offers an API for custom integrations.</p>
5

Integratability

5/10

<p>Currently, it only offers native integration with Zapier, while HubSpot and Slack integrations are listed as "coming soon."</p><p><br></p><p>Enterprise-level plans include a more affordable Speech-to-Text API, and a Call Recording API, which automatically integrates with all CX and voice platforms and allows you to record all customer calls.</p>
8

Integratability

8/10

<p>Integrates with a wide range of popular tools like Google Calendar, Slack, and Zoom, though some advanced integrations (Jira, HubSpot etc.) require premium plans.</p>
3

Integratability

3/10

<p>Otter.ai only offers a handful of integrations with the most popular 3rd party tools e.g. Slack, Google Docs, Salesforce, Pipedrive. It lacks any integrations with project management tools or applicant tracking system, It also lacks an API for custom integrations.</p>
Ease of Migration
4

Ease of Migration

4/10

<p>Meetings can be shared via a link or sent to an email address, with adjustable access settings. Meeting notes can also be automatically pushed to connected integrations.</p><p><br></p><p>However, a drawback is that the ability to download the meeting recording or copy the transcript to the clipboard is only available on the paid plan.</p>
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>You can easily download transcripts, meeting summaries, and share recordings.</p>
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>You're able to download transcript, meeting summaries and audio in various formats. For transcripts, you can also include timestamp and speaker names.</p>
5

Ease of Migration

5/10

<p>Meetings can be shared via email or link, with options to control permissions for editing, viewing, or accessing the summary. Notes can be copied to the clipboard, transcripts can be copied or saved as .txt files, and recordings can be downloaded.</p>
9

Ease of Migration

9/10

<p>Read AI offers various options to share meeting recordings and notes, including downloading the summary or transcript (both in .txt), the full video, or auto-generated trailer/highlights (all in .mp4). It also provides quick share buttons for integrations like Notion, Slack, and more. Meeting reports can be shared via link or email, with access control options.</p>
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>You're able to download transcript, meeting summaries and audio in various formats. For transcripts, you can also include timestamp and speaker names.</p>

Supernormal : tl;dv alternative for enterprise security compliance

Supernormal product logo
Supernormal

Stackfix Rating:

6.4 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

$0

Calculate your price
Updated onMar 14, 2025
Supernormal stands out as a more secure alternative to tl;dv for enterprise security compliance due to its SOC 2 Type II certification. While both platforms offer GDPR compliance, Supernormal’s additional SOC 2 Type II compliance demonstrates a commitment to data security controls, risk management, and privacy protection. This certification is particularly crucial for enterprises handling sensitive meeting data, as it verifies rigorous security practices and regular third-party audits. tl;dv’s lack of SOC 2 Type II compliance may present compliance challenges for organizations with strict security requirements.

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of tl;dv vs. Supernormal .

Pros

  • Highly Customizable Summary Templates

  • Versatile AI Assistant Capabilities

  • Strong Export Functionality

Cons

  • Can't Record Without a Meeting Bot

  • Mediocre User Interface

  • Weak Search and Analytics Capabilities

  • Transcripts can't be Edited

Compare all AI notetakersRead the full review

Fireflies.ai: tl;dv alternative for recording in-person meetings

Fireflies.ai product logo
Fireflies.ai

Stackfix Rating:

6.9 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

$0

Calculate your price
Updated onMar 14, 2025
Fireflies.ai stands out for recording in-person meetings through its dedicated mobile app that offers one-click transcription. While tl;dv lacks mobile recording capabilities entirely, Fireflies.ai enables users to easily capture and transcribe face-to-face conversations with impressive accuracy, even for speakers with accents. The mobile app seamlessly integrates with Fireflies.ai’s core features, allowing users to access transcripts, generate meeting notes, and share content just as they would with virtual meetings.

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of tl;dv vs. Fireflies.ai.

Pros

  • Exceptional AI Meeting Notes Generation

  • Highly Accurate Transcription

  • Effective In-Meeting Search

  • Comprehensive Integration Ecosystem

  • Strong Export Functionality

Cons

  • Poor Visual Design

  • Underpowered AI Assistant

  • No Custom Templates

Compare all AI notetakersRead the full review

Krisp: tl;dv alternative for managing audio quality

Krisp product logo
Krisp

Stackfix Rating:

6.1 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

$0

Calculate your price
Updated onMar 14, 2025
While tl;dv offers basic audio management features, Krisp stands out with its superior audio quality control capabilities in three key areas. First, Krisp’s noise cancellation technology effectively removes background noise, voices, and echoes for all users. Second, its transcription accuracy provides highly accurate speech-to-text conversion with editable speaker tags. Finally, enterprise users benefit from advanced features like AI Accent Localization, which automatically converts accents in real-time to match the listener’s native accent, and real-time translation capabilities. In contrast, tl;dv’s audio features are more limited, with moderately accurate transcriptions and no ability to edit speaker tags or transcripts.

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of tl;dv vs. Krisp.

Pros

  • Superior Audio Quality and Noise Cancellation

  • Polished User Interface

  • Highly Accurate Transcription

Cons

  • Poor AI Note Generation

  • No AI Assistant

  • Poor Integration Ecosystem

  • Limited Customization Options

  • Basic Customer Support

Compare all AI notetakersRead the full review

Read AI: tl;dv alternative for tracking meeting engagement metrics

Read AI product logo
Read AI

Stackfix Rating:

5.5 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

$0

Calculate your price
Updated onMar 14, 2025
Read AI offers a more comprehensive alternative for tracking meeting engagement metrics than tl;dv. While tl;dv provides basic metrics like talk time and filler words, Read AI delivers deeper insights with advanced engagement tracking. It measures attention levels, sentiment analysis, charisma impact, and participant bias – metrics tl;dv doesn’t offer. Read AI also analyzes engagement patterns across multiple meetings, offering intelligent recommendations such as identifying low-contributing participants and suggesting meeting invite adjustments. Furthermore, Read AI’s automatic pre-meeting briefings and post-meeting recaps help maintain consistent engagement tracking, unlike tl;dv’s more basic reporting system.

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of tl;dv vs. Read AI.

Pros

  • Effective Automated Sharing

  • Excellent File Sharing Capabilities

  • Outstanding Engagement Analytics

  • Strong Cross-meeting Insights

  • Robust Integration Ecosystem

Cons

  • Severely Limited Customization Options

  • Cluttered and Overwhelming Interface

  • Steep Learning Curve

  • No AI Assistant Capabilities

  • Limited Speaker Tag Editing

Compare all AI notetakersRead the full review

Otter.ai: tl;dv alternative for maintaining accurate transcripts

Otter.ai product logo
Otter.ai

Stackfix Rating:

6.0 / 10

Visit website

Starting at

$0

Calculate your price
Updated onMar 14, 2025
While tl;dv provides transcriptions, Otter.ai is preferred for transcript management due to its powerful editing features. Unlike tl;dv, which restricts transcript modifications, Otter.ai empowers users to edit both transcript text and speaker labels. This editing flexibility is essential for correcting AI transcription nuances, especially with technical terminology or diverse speech patterns. Moreover, Otter.ai’s transcripts include precise timestamps and clearly distinguished speakers, facilitating seamless navigation and long-term transcript precision.

Want to know more? See a detailed comparison of tl;dv vs. Otter.ai.

Pros

  • Robust Export Capabilities

  • Powerful AI Chat Assistant

Cons

  • Poor Transcript Accuracy

  • Subpar Customer Support

  • Limited Customization Options

  • Poor Integration Capabilities

  • Highly Restrictive Free Tier

Compare all AI notetakersRead the full review

How we test products

With AI Notetaking tools becoming increasingly essential for businesses, we focus on identifying the best options for small and midsize teams. Our evaluation process reflects real-world usage, prioritizing functionality, ease of use, and overall value. Here’s how we do it:

Functionality

AI Notetaking software should do more than just transcribe—it should capture key insights, summarize discussions, and enhance productivity. We start by identifying key use cases—meeting transcription, summarization, action item extraction, and collaboration—then test how well each platform delivers on these needs. Tools that provide high accuracy and useful summaries without unnecessary complexity score highest.

User Experience & Onboarding

A great AI Notetaking tool should be intuitive and frictionless. We test each platform’s interface by navigating core features without prior training and track onboarding time—from account setup to first meeting capture. Platforms that require extensive setup or manual adjustments lose points.

Accuracy & AI Capabilities

AI-powered transcription and summarization must be reliable. We evaluate speech-to-text accuracy, language understanding, and summarization quality. We also test whether AI-generated action items and key takeaways are actually useful or just generic outputs.

Integrations & Compatibility

AI Notetaking tools should work seamlessly with video conferencing platforms, project management software, and CRMs. We test how well each tool integrates with essential business systems and assess whether native integrations or third-party connectors are required.

Pricing & Value

We compare pricing across competitors, analyzing what each plan includes and whether critical features are locked behind paywalls. Hidden costs—such as per-minute transcription fees, premium AI features, or required enterprise plans—are factored into our assessment. Platforms that offer strong core functionality at a fair price score highest.

Stackfix’s Fit Score

All of these factors contribute to Stackfix’s Fit Score, a proprietary ranking system that measures how well each AI Notetaking tool aligns with a buyer’s needs. It combines two key elements:

  • Requirements Met – How many buyer requirements the software fulfills
  • Stackfix Rating – Our expert assessment of the software’s overall quality, usability, and value

The result? A clear, data-driven recommendation that helps businesses choose the right AI Notetaking software—without hours of trial and error.

FAQs

What is an AI Notetaker?

An AI notetaker is a tool that automatically transcribes, summarizes, and organizes meeting notes, helping individuals and teams capture key insights without manual effort. These platforms use AI-powered speech recognition and natural language processing (NLP) to turn conversations into structured, searchable notes—making it easier to recall action items, decisions, and important discussions. The key features of an AI notetaker usually include:

  • Real-Time Transcription: AI-powered tools that capture and transcribe meetings in real time, ensuring accuracy across different accents, languages, and speaking styles.
  • Summarization & Action Items: AI-generated meeting summaries, key takeaways, and action items to help users quickly digest discussions without reviewing full transcripts.
  • Speaker Identification: Ability to differentiate speakers and attribute statements correctly, making transcripts more readable and actionable.
  • Collaboration & Sharing: Easy sharing of meeting notes, highlights, and recordings with team members via integrations with email, Slack, or project management tools.
  • Search & Organization: AI-powered keyword detection, tagging, and smart search to help users quickly find relevant past discussions and decisions.

What should I consider when buying an AI notetaker?

Choosing the right AI notetaker can transform how you capture, organize, and act on information—so it’s essential to find one that fits your workflow, integrations, and budget. Here are the key factors to consider before making your decision.

  1. Your Use Case. Start by identifying how you’ll use the AI notetaker. Do you need a tool for team meetings, customer calls, brainstorming sessions, or legal/compliance documentation? Different platforms specialize in different areas, so choosing one tailored to your needs ensures better accuracy and relevant features.
  2. Ease of Use. An AI notetaker should simplify workflows, not add complexity. Look for a tool that’s easy to set up, requires minimal training, and integrates smoothly with your existing tools. Platforms that require manual corrections or frequent troubleshooting will slow you down.
  3. Integration with Your Workflow. Your AI notetaker should fit seamlessly into your workflow. If you use Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Slack, or Notion, check whether the tool offers native integrations or requires manual workarounds. A good AI notetaker should automatically sync notes with project management, CRM, or documentation tools.
  4. Summarization & AI Quality. Not all AI-generated summaries are equal. Some tools produce concise, high-quality summaries, while others generate long, unstructured text that still requires manual editing. Test how well the AI captures key points, assigns action items, and differentiates between general discussion and critical decisions.
  5. Scalability & Collaboration. If you’re using an AI notetaker for a growing team, ensure it supports multiple users, shared workspaces, and role-based permissions. The best tools allow for collaborative editing, team comments, and centralized access to past notes.
  6. Pricing & Hidden Costs. AI notetaker pricing varies based on transcription limits, team seats, storage, and premium AI features. Check for hidden costs, such as:
  7. Limits on meeting hours per month
  8. Extra fees for advanced AI-generated summaries
  9. Costs for exporting transcripts or integrating with premium tools
  10. Storage limits and add-ons for long-term transcript access
  11. Customer Support & Reliability. Since AI notetakers handle critical business meetings, fast and reliable support is important. Check if the vendor offers 24/7 chat support, email response times, and self-service knowledge bases. A downtime-prone or buggy AI tool can result in lost notes and frustration.

What are the common mistakes to avoid when choosing an AI notetaker?

Avoiding common pitfalls when selecting an AI notetaker can save you time, frustration, and missed insights. Here are some of the biggest mistakes teams make - and how to avoid them.

  1. Prioritizing price over accuracy. A cheap AI notetaker with poor transcription quality will cost you more time in manual corrections than a premium tool with high accuracy.
  2. Assuming all integrations work flawlessly. Some tools claim to integrate with Zoom, Slack, or CRMs, but may require manual exports or unreliable third-party connectors. Always test integrations.
  3. Overlooking search functionality. If you plan to reference old meeting notes, look for a tool with advanced search, keyword tagging, and filters. Poor search capabilities make finding past discussions difficult.
  4. Ignoring privacy & security. AI notetakers handle sensitive business conversations, so check data encryption, compliance certifications (GDPR, SOC 2), and storage policies.
  5. Choosing a tool that doesn’t scale. A notetaker that works well for a solo user may not support team-wide collaboration, shared notes, or enterprise compliance features.


How much does AI Notetaking Software typically cost?

Most AI notetaker solutions range from $10-75 per user monthly, with entry-level options starting around $10-20 and premium solutions exceeding $75 monthly. Most vendors structure pricing in tiers based on features and meeting volume, so be sure to enter your requirements as accurately as possible in our pricing calculator.

Many providers offer free plans with core functionality for personal use and very small teams but restrict meeting length (typically 15-30 minutes), transcription hours (2-5 hours monthly), or available features. Otter, Fireflies, and Notion AI all provide capable free tiers that can handle basic note-taking needs without cost. For personal users who only need occasional meeting notes, these free tiers are often sufficient.

The free tier trend is particularly strong in this market, with most major players offering a no-cost entry point to attract individual users who may later upgrade or bring the tool into their workplace. While these free versions typically limit advanced features like custom AI analysis, speaker identification, or integration capabilities, they provide enough functionality for personal productivity.

For enterprise plans and above, you can expect to speak to sales for a bespoke price. These custom quotes typically factor in integration needs, security requirements, and user volume discounts. To skip the demo calls, be sure to check out our pricing calculator.

Compare other AI Notetakers

View our comparisons of other AI Notetaking

GF

Granola vs Fathom

Bt

Bluedot vs tl;dv

GM

Grain vs MeetGeek

SS

Spellar vs Spiky