logo
Search for anything...
About

Best AI Notetaker for Remote Teams in the EU 2025

Written by Camin McCluskey

Co-Founder & CTO

Edited by Steph Leung

Product & Operations Lead

Updated onApr 2, 2025

Keeping remote teams aligned is hard – especially with scattered notes and missed action items. In this guide, we break down the best AI notetakers for remote teams in the EU, covering tools that excel at summaries, mobile support, and sales follow-ups. We’ve tested them all with data privacy in mind – so you can choose what works for your team in 2025.

Best AI notetakers for different use cases

For highly customizable meeting summaries:

Supernormal  product logo

Supernormal

Stackfix Rating:

6.4 / 10

Supernormal is a strong choice for remote teams in the EU that need highly customisable meeting summaries. It’s ideal for teams that want to tailor how meeting notes are captured, shared, and used – rather than settling for generic AI output.

You can create your own summary templates and formats based on team needs. For example, project managers might set up a ‘project challenges’ summary, while sales teams can use a ‘sales pitch’ template. This level of flexibility helps teams get exactly the context they need, without having to manually edit every time.

Customisability also extends to AI Agents. You can personalise agents for specific scenarios, like interviews or recurring meeting types, and even customise their names, appearance, and prompts. In our testing, we gave Supernormal an 8/10 for both AI assistant capabilities and customisability.

The ‘Ask me anything’ feature worked well, letting us quickly pull key answers from transcripts – a big time-saver. However, there are limitations. Supernormal requires a meeting bot to record, and the transcription isn’t editable post-meeting, which can be frustrating if the AI gets something wrong.

Still, for remote teams in the EU that prioritise tailored, repeatable workflows – and want summaries

Jump to product

For teams needing a mobile app for in-person meetings:

Fireflies.ai product logo

Fireflies.ai

Stackfix Rating:

6.9 / 10

Fireflies.ai is a great fit for remote teams in the EU that need a mobile app to capture in-person meetings. While many AI notetakers are built purely for virtual calls, Fireflies stands out by offering a mobile app that records and transcribes live conversations—ideal for interviews, workshops, conferences, or any face-to-face collaboration.

In our testing, Fireflies delivered accurate transcriptions, even with varied accents. Its AI-generated summaries are flexible—you can choose to highlight key takeaways, ideas, or blockers, depending on your workflow. We rated it 8/10 for meeting note generation, thanks to its balance of accuracy and control.

It also plays well with others. Fireflies integrates with popular tools, letting you send notes or action items straight into your CRM, project management software, or ATS. It’s a great way to streamline follow-ups and keep your team aligned across tools.

One drawback is the removal of its Chrome extension, which previously allowed recording without a meeting bot. Still, this is a minor limitation given the platform’s strengths—especially for teams that need reliable, high-quality transcription on the go.

With strong mobile functionality, smart AI summarisation, and broad integrations, Fireflies is a solid option for hybrid teams looking to capture conversations wherever they happen. We scored it 8/10 for functionality.

Jump to product

For sales teams that need to track deal progress:

Fathom product logo

Fathom

Stackfix Rating:

6.9 / 10

Fathom is a standout AI notetaker for EU-based sales teams looking to track deal progress and keep CRM data up to date. With native integrations for HubSpot and Salesforce, it automatically pushes meeting notes and action items into your CRM. That means no manual follow-ups and no lost context.

It’s built with sales workflows in mind. You can create custom templates based on your playbook, helping reps stay focused on key talking points. Real-time coaching nudges reps if they’re talking too much or not asking enough questions. These small details help improve call quality over time.

In our testing, Fathom delivered accurate transcriptions and handled speaker identification well. You can easily edit or reassign speaker labels, which many notetakers still miss. We gave it a 9/10 for transcription quality.

Fathom also makes sharing easy. You can send summaries and recordings to prospects or clients, with the option to revoke access later. It’s a useful feature for keeping everyone aligned while staying in control of what gets shared.

The only downside is that the platform can feel a bit overwhelming at first. But for sales teams that want a powerful, customisable notetaker that fits cleanly into their workflow, Fathom is one of the best options available. We rated it 9/10 for overall functionality.

Jump to product

For teams needing high-quality audio in multilingual environments:

Krisp product logo

Krisp

Stackfix Rating:

6.1 / 10

For remote teams in the EU where English isn’t everyone’s first language, Krisp is a strong option. It doesn’t offer all the advanced AI assistant features you’ll find in other tools, but what it does, it does really well – especially when it comes to audio quality and transcription accuracy.

Krisp’s core strength is audio control. Its noise cancellation removes background chatter, echoes, and other distractions, which is especially helpful for remote teams working from different environments. On Enterprise plans, Krisp also offers AI Accent Localization, which adjusts speaker accents in real time to make them easier to understand. This can make a big difference for international teams or customer-facing conversations across regions.

In our testing, Krisp’s transcription accuracy was excellent. You can edit transcripts and tweak speaker tags post-call, which many platforms still don’t support. We gave it a 9/10 for transcription quality.

It’s worth noting that Krisp doesn’t include an AI assistant, so you can’t ask questions or get summaries from your transcript. Its functionality is focused on recording, transcribing, and cleaning up audio – and it does those things very well. If your team values audio clarity and clean transcripts over bells and whistles, Krisp is a dependable, no-frills choice.

Jump to product

For analyzing meeting engagement and performance:

Read AI product logo

Read AI

Stackfix Rating:

5.5 / 10

Read AI is a great fit for remote teams in the EU that want to go beyond basic note-taking and actually understand how their meetings are going. It tracks a range of engagement metrics, including speaker participation, attention levels, sentiment, charisma, and even bias – giving teams real insights into meeting performance.

One of its most useful features is the ‘For You’ page, which highlights key takeaways, action items, top questions, and a section called ‘What You Missed’ – a smart way to stay in the loop if you couldn’t make a meeting. It helps cut through the noise and keeps everyone aligned, even across time zones or busy schedules.

In our testing, Read AI was fully GDPR compliant, which is important for EU-based teams. We gave it a 10/10 for tracking engagement and performance metrics – it’s one of the most insightful tools we’ve reviewed in that area.

There are some limitations. Read AI doesn’t have an AI assistant, so you can’t ask questions or dig deeper into transcripts like you can with some other platforms. And while it offers solid core features – like transcription, mobile support, and file uploads – its functionality is more focused than full-featured. We rated it 7/10 overall for functionality.

But if you’re looking to improve how your team runs meetings, Read AI offers actionable insights that can make a real difference – without adding extra complexity.

Jump to product

For ease of use:

Grain product logo

Grain

Stackfix Rating:

8.6 / 10

Grain is one of the best AI notetakers for remote teams in the EU thanks to its clean design and thoughtful user experience. It strikes a rare balance – polished enough for heavy users, simple enough for casual ones, and flexible enough for both individuals and teams.

In our testing, we found that many AI notetakers tend to over-index in one area and fall short in others. Grain doesn’t. It’s well-rounded, with intuitive flows for recording meetings, inviting the bot, and quickly reviewing assigned action items. Day-to-day use feels smooth and considered.

That said, the interface has a few quirks. Some icons are unlabelled, and certain workflows – like organising past notes – could be clearer. But overall, the platform feels stable and user-friendly. We rated Grain 9/10 for ease of use, which puts it among the top in this category.

The simplicity does come with trade-offs. Grain doesn’t offer advanced features like cross-meeting insights or trend summaries. Its search is also limited – if you don’t know which meeting something was said in, it can take a bit of digging to find it.

Still, for remote teams looking for a reliable, easy-to-use notetaker that delivers strong core functionality without adding complexity, Grain is a well-built and dependable choice. It’s simple, thoughtful, and does the basics very well.

Jump to product

CM

Meet your expert: Camin McCluskey

Stackfix Co-Founder & CTO

Having worked as a software engineer and CTO in enterprise and startup environments, I've been on both sides of the software buying journey. I'm excited to help you find the right software for your business, as well as supporting our partners to communicate what makes their software unique.

Supernormal  logo

Supernormal

Fireflies.ai logo

Fireflies.ai

Fathom logo

Fathom

Krisp logo

Krisp

Read AI logo

Read AI

Grain logo

Grain

Our rating
Functionality
5

Functionality

5/10

<p>Mostly offers core AI notetaking functionality: recording and transcribing meetings, uploading your own audio/video files for transcripts, but lacks a mobile app. It can't record without a meeting bot, lacks analytics, and its custom agents are still in early stages of development.</p>
8

Functionality

8/10

<p>Offers the standard AI notetaking functionality - including recording on mobile app, global search &amp; AI chat across meetings. Meeting notes and transcripts are generally of high quality. Also has some additional functionality, such as conversation intelligence (analyse talk time distribution). However, the Chrome Extension that allowed users to record without a meeting bot is no longer available.</p>
9

Functionality

9/10

<p>Fathom is one of the most feature-rich AI notetakers we’ve reviewed—it took a while to test everything.</p><p><br></p><p>It’s clear why there’s a “Give Feedback” option in so many places throughout the app: if you’re trying to accomplish something, there’s a good chance Fathom has either already built it or optimised it for quick use.</p>
6

Functionality

6/10

<p>Krisp offers excellent features like accent localisation and real-time translation, though these are limited to Enterprise-level plans. It lacks an AI assistant and the ability to use custom templates for AI summaries. While its noise cancellation is outstanding for audio recording, its video recording capabilities are limited. Currently, it only supports screen recording or video capture via a bot on Zoom.</p>
7

Functionality

7/10

<p>Read’s functionality focuses on speech analysis, offering tools to evaluate engagement and the impact of speech on others. It provides great summaries across multiple conversations to keep you informed. However, it lacks options to customise AI insights or edit key moments in meetings, and there is no AI assistant to answer questions or expand on specific insights.</p>
8

Functionality

8/10

<p>Grain is well-rounded, offering all the functionality you'd expect from an AI notetaker. It simplifies managing your team, upcoming meetings, summary templates, playback, finding and organizing meeting information, and sharing with participants and team members. Every feature is carefully chosen, with no unnecessary functionality added.</p><p>The only notable missing feature is insights spanning multiple meetings.</p>
Ease of Use
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Key workflows, like recording meetings and inviting the bot, are intuitive and straightforward, with the Chrome extension providing added convenience. However, the "Invite" buttons in the web app can be confusing at first—one is for inviting the bot to meetings, and the other is for inviting users to the app.</p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Key workflows such as recording meetings, inviting the bot to meetings is generally intuitive and straightforward. Especially on the paid tier, where you can see at a glance all the action items from your meetings. There are some unmarked elements / icons over the web app which will take a bit of getting used to. The UX of beta AI features is also underwhelming e.g When searching across meetings, you're only able to ask AI assistant question one-by-one, instead of asking follow up questions.</p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Although Fathom offers a ton of features, it does an excellent job of onboarding users with demo and explanation videos. There isn’t a mountain of settings to configure and learn before getting started—everything is either well-explained or easy to understand.</p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Setting up Krisp is quick and straightforward, with its core functionality being highly intuitive. The menu bar app allows you to transcribe meetings, record audio, or capture the screen, and the rest is handled in the background.</p>
5

Ease of Use

5/10

<p>Read has a high learning curve, largely due to its extensive speech analysis tools and unique suggestions, such as recommending meeting skips or removing low-contributing participants. It can take time to get used to the navigation, particularly if you prefer simpler, more condensed summaries.</p>
9

Ease of Use

9/10

<p>Setting up with Grain is extremely easy, and its core functionality is intuitive. Users can choose how deeply they want to engage with the platform. If they stick to the core features, they won’t be overwhelmed by additional functionality, as advanced features are typically well-hidden in settings and can be accessed only when needed.</p>
Look and feel
5

Look and feel

5/10

<p>The design is clean and modern but simple, with a functional layout—nothing spectacular. Page load times are decent (2-3 seconds). There were occasional error pages, and the AI agents were temporarily down during testing, but since they were in BETA, it's understandable. Trying to open information on their website help pages sometimes annoyingly redirects you to the web app if you're signed in.</p>
5

Look and feel

5/10

<p>Modern and visually acceptable. But the amount of AI features/ Ask Fred that appear upon hover can be quite distracting. Page loads can be slow (3-5 seconds) when clicking into meeting notes, waiting for AI response takes up to 10 seconds, but that's to be expected.</p>
4

Look and feel

4/10

<p>Fathom’s extensive feature set comes at a cost—everywhere you move your mouse, a tooltip appears, or there’s an option to click something. This can get overwhelming when you’re just trying to accomplish simple tasks.</p><p>During setup and early use, they heavily promote their “Point” system (feedback in exchange for points) and frequently send feedback emails and questions, which can become a bit intrusive.</p>
9

Look and feel

9/10

<p>Krisp has a modern, polished design that ensures easy navigation, supported by a powerful search feature. The playback interface is excellent, featuring word highlighting and colour-coded player bars for each speaker.</p><p><br></p><p>It balances quick-access features with advanced options, which are neatly tucked away in menus or settings buttons. Essential elements are prioritised, keeping the layout clean and uncluttered. The home page displays key meeting details, including the participants, date, and whether it includes audio, video, or notes—information often absent from other AI notetakers' dashboards.</p>
4

Look and feel

4/10

<p>Read's interface is modern but somewhat overloaded with features, similar to Fathom. Information is duplicated in the report, such as action items appearing in both the notes on the left and the highlights on the right. During testing, we found ourselves frequently scrolling between sections, whereas other AI notetakers use better design and spacing to present information more clearly.</p>
9

Look and feel

9/10

<p>Grain is exceptionally polished, offering rich functionality without overwhelming the interface with unnecessary detail. Finding what you need is easy thanks to its powerful search. Within meetings, you can view the recording and notes in three templates, each designed for:</p><ul><li>Reviewing calls and coaching</li><li>Navigating and searching calls</li><li>Creating clips</li></ul><p>There’s a good balance between quick-access features and more advanced settings, with only essential elements displayed on the page. Even the AI assistant is tucked behind a button that opens a pop-up when pressed, keeping the interface streamlined overall.</p>
Customisability
8

Customisability

8/10

<p>For summary notes: You can customise your summary template and arrange sections in any order. You can also create your own summary types, eliminating the need to ask the AI assistant the same questions each time.</p><p><br></p><p>For custom agents: Customise the agent’s name, theme, and the questions it will ask during the interview.</p>
6

Customisability

6/10

<p>You can freely edit meeting notes and transcripts, and organise your meeting notes into channels. However, the only major let down is you're unable to set up custom meeting note templates. Though you are able choose from a large selection of templates.</p>
8

Customisability

8/10

<p>Fathom provides control over many aspects of the transcript, summary notes, speaker tags, and highlighting. If other AI notetakers often mis-transcribe or misidentify speakers without allowing edits, Fathom could be the solution for you.</p>
3

Customisability

3/10

<p>The ability to edit the transcript and speaker(s) is useful, but other features are lacking:</p><ul><li>No custom templates</li><li>Can't add comments to notes or the transcript</li><li>Can't tag meetings with codes</li><li>No tools for creating clips or playlists</li><li>No customisation for the meeting bot</li></ul>
3

Customisability

3/10

<p>Read offers many AI insights, but customisation options are limited. You can't modify the template for summaries, action items, or key questions, and the trailer/highlights generated for meeting recordings can't be customised. Even the tags on reports are limited to a selection of auto-generated options.</p>
9

Customisability

9/10

<p>Grain is highly customizable at every stage, including:</p><ul><li>Fully editable transcripts, both in text and speakers.</li><li>Notes that can be regenerated with a different template, and the ability to create custom templates. AI assistant answers can be added to notes and templates with a single click.</li><li>Comments can be left on notes, and highlights can be created, with both displayed separately.</li><li>Clips can be merged into stories, and meetings can be grouped into playlists.</li><li>Tags can be added to meetings, and custom trackers set up to track specific topics—by both single words and multi-word phrases.</li><li>Custom words can be added for improved recognition in transcripts.</li></ul>
Ease of Setup
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Provides note templates and guided input boxes for creating custom ones. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows takes&nbsp;30-40 minutes&nbsp;due to a rich library of Zapier templates. Comes with some predefined agents for interviewing and setting up new agents takes 10-15 minutes.</p>
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Over 70 editable note templates with guided creation. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows are seamless with native integrations and a rich library of Zapier templates, taking&nbsp;just 30-40 minutes.</p>
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Provides 15 note templates, customizable but without guided input creation. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows require Zapier but lack a rich library of Zapier templates, taking&nbsp;1-2 hours.</p>
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>Self-serve for basic tiers; enterprise setup requires booking a demo and may take several days/weeks to get set up. No note templates; requires desktop app installation. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows require Zapier but lack a rich library of Zapier templates, taking&nbsp;1-2 hours.</p>
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Provides AI insights but no custom note templates. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows require Zapier but lack a rich library of Zapier templates, taking&nbsp;1-2 hours.</p>
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Handful of note templates with guided input creation for sections. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows via Zapier take&nbsp;30-40 minutes&nbsp;because there is a rich library of predefined templates.</p>
Customer Support
6

Customer Support

6/10

<p>An AI-powered chatbot with the option to message support. Typically, a real person replies within a few hours, but it can take up to 48 hours in some cases.</p>
6

Customer Support

6/10

<p>Help centre was of decent quality and depth, offering step by step instructions. Offers personalised live chat with an AI chatbot. It was relatively quick to be connected with a human agent (within minutes), however, the help we were offered wasn't the most helpful, with irrelevant help centre articles provided.</p>
8

Customer Support

8/10

<p>They offer an FAQ help centre and the option to send messages directly on their website. We received responses within a few minutes at best, and within a couple of hours at worst, though replies can take up to 24 hours. They answered our questions thoroughly and provided additional details for reassurance.</p>
5

Customer Support

5/10

<p>The help centre provides detailed explanations for common questions, including setup and integration guides. The chatbot only allows ticket submissions, with no option to speak to a human agent, and responses are typically provided within 24 hours.</p>
5

Customer Support

5/10

<p>A contact form is available on their page, along with a searchable FAQ section. Usual replies are within 24 hours.</p>
8

Customer Support

8/10

<p>You can book a live demo, and there’s a Guides &amp; Resources page with over 100 articles.</p><p>Additionally, in-app chat support is available, with human agents typically responding within a few minutes.</p>
Integratability
6

Integratability

6/10

<p>Supernormal offers useful integrations with a wide range of 3rd party tools e.g. Slack, Google Docs, Salesforce, Pipedrive. It has integrations with project management tools like ClickUp and Linear, lacks integrations with applicant tracking systems and doesn't have an API for custom integrations.</p>
8

Integratability

8/10

<p>Offers good integrations with most reasonably relevant third party tools e.g. CRM, project management tool, applicant tracking systems which allows you to automatically push meeting notes and action items into those systems. Also offers an API for custom integrations.</p>
4

Integratability

4/10

<p>Fathom doesn’t integrate with many other software platforms, but it covers the main ones.</p>
5

Integratability

5/10

<p>Currently, it only offers native integration with Zapier, while HubSpot and Slack integrations are listed as "coming soon."</p><p><br></p><p>Enterprise-level plans include a more affordable Speech-to-Text API, and a Call Recording API, which automatically integrates with all CX and voice platforms and allows you to record all customer calls.</p>
8

Integratability

8/10

<p>Integrates with a wide range of popular tools like Google Calendar, Slack, and Zoom, though some advanced integrations (Jira, HubSpot etc.) require premium plans.</p>
9

Integratability

9/10

<p>Grain integrates with most major software and offers ready-made, tested Zapier templates for Notion, Google Drive, Cardinal, Trello, and others.</p><p>The app features a native "Deals" section that lets you track deal status, risks, and momentum in one place when connected to HubSpot.</p><p>Recordings, transcripts, notes, and meeting metadata can also be integrated with any platform via the Grain API.</p>
Ease of Migration
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>You can easily download transcripts, meeting summaries, and share recordings.</p>
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>You're able to download transcript, meeting summaries and audio in various formats. For transcripts, you can also include timestamp and speaker names.</p>
9

Ease of Migration

9/10

<p>Fathom allows you to share a meeting recording via a link and control access, including the ability to revoke an attendee's access to play the recording after sharing. You can download the video recordings too.</p><p>The “Copy Follow-up Email” button is very handy after short meetings.</p><p>For the action items, it offers specific “Copy for…” options for Asana, Google Docs, Gmail, Todoist, and Microsoft Word, ensuring links and formatting are optimized for each platform. This feature is also available for summaries, with options for Google Docs, Gmail, Notion, and Microsoft Word.</p>
5

Ease of Migration

5/10

<p>Meetings can be shared via email or link, with options to control permissions for editing, viewing, or accessing the summary. Notes can be copied to the clipboard, transcripts can be copied or saved as .txt files, and recordings can be downloaded.</p>
9

Ease of Migration

9/10

<p>Read AI offers various options to share meeting recordings and notes, including downloading the summary or transcript (both in .txt), the full video, or auto-generated trailer/highlights (all in .mp4). It also provides quick share buttons for integrations like Notion, Slack, and more. Meeting reports can be shared via link or email, with access control options.</p>
10

Ease of Migration

10/10

<p>Meeting recaps can be automatically shared with workspace members, participants from your team domain(s) or all meeting participants.</p><p>Individual meetings can be shared via a link, with access revocable at any time. You can also include a description and start the meeting at a selected timestamp.</p><p>Clips from the meeting can be added to a story and shared together. Additionally, there’s an option to copy the embed iframe. The meeting recording can be downloaded, and the transcript can be exported in .pdf, .srt, .vtt, or .docx format.</p>

Best for highly customizable meeting summaries

Supernormal  product logo
Supernormal

Stackfix Rating:

6.4 / 10

Visit website

Updated onApr 2, 2025

Supernormal is a strong choice for remote teams in the EU that need highly customisable meeting summaries. It’s ideal for teams that want to tailor how meeting notes are captured, shared, and used – rather than settling for generic AI output.

You can create your own summary templates and formats based on team needs. For example, project managers might set up a ‘project challenges’ summary, while sales teams can use a ‘sales pitch’ template. This level of flexibility helps teams get exactly the context they need, without having to manually edit every time.

Customisability also extends to AI Agents. You can personalise agents for specific scenarios, like interviews or recurring meeting types, and even customise their names, appearance, and prompts. In our testing, we gave Supernormal an 8/10 for both AI assistant capabilities and customisability.

The ‘Ask me anything’ feature worked well, letting us quickly pull key answers from transcripts – a big time-saver. However, there are limitations. Supernormal requires a meeting bot to record, and the transcription isn’t editable post-meeting, which can be frustrating if the AI gets something wrong.

Still, for remote teams in the EU that prioritise tailored, repeatable workflows – and want summaries

Want to know more? Get a full breakdown of Supernormal 's features and pricing.

Pros

  • Highly Customizable Summary Templates

  • Versatile AI Assistant Capabilities

  • Strong Export Functionality

Cons

  • Can't Record Without a Meeting Bot

  • Mediocre User Interface

  • Weak Search and Analytics Capabilities

  • Transcripts can't be Edited

Best for teams needing a mobile app for in-person meetings

Fireflies.ai product logo
Fireflies.ai

Stackfix Rating:

6.9 / 10

Visit website

Updated onApr 2, 2025

Fireflies.ai is a great fit for remote teams in the EU that need a mobile app to capture in-person meetings. While many AI notetakers are built purely for virtual calls, Fireflies stands out by offering a mobile app that records and transcribes live conversations—ideal for interviews, workshops, conferences, or any face-to-face collaboration.

In our testing, Fireflies delivered accurate transcriptions, even with varied accents. Its AI-generated summaries are flexible—you can choose to highlight key takeaways, ideas, or blockers, depending on your workflow. We rated it 8/10 for meeting note generation, thanks to its balance of accuracy and control.

It also plays well with others. Fireflies integrates with popular tools, letting you send notes or action items straight into your CRM, project management software, or ATS. It’s a great way to streamline follow-ups and keep your team aligned across tools.

One drawback is the removal of its Chrome extension, which previously allowed recording without a meeting bot. Still, this is a minor limitation given the platform’s strengths—especially for teams that need reliable, high-quality transcription on the go.

With strong mobile functionality, smart AI summarisation, and broad integrations, Fireflies is a solid option for hybrid teams looking to capture conversations wherever they happen. We scored it 8/10 for functionality.

Want to know more? Get a full breakdown of Fireflies.ai's features and pricing.

Pros

  • Exceptional AI Meeting Notes Generation

  • Highly Accurate Transcription

  • Effective In-Meeting Search

  • Comprehensive Integration Ecosystem

  • Strong Export Functionality

Cons

  • Poor Visual Design

  • Underpowered AI Assistant

  • No Custom Templates

Best for sales teams that need to track deal progress

Fathom product logo
Fathom

Stackfix Rating:

6.9 / 10

Visit website

Updated onApr 2, 2025

Fathom is a standout AI notetaker for EU-based sales teams looking to track deal progress and keep CRM data up to date. With native integrations for HubSpot and Salesforce, it automatically pushes meeting notes and action items into your CRM. That means no manual follow-ups and no lost context.

It’s built with sales workflows in mind. You can create custom templates based on your playbook, helping reps stay focused on key talking points. Real-time coaching nudges reps if they’re talking too much or not asking enough questions. These small details help improve call quality over time.

In our testing, Fathom delivered accurate transcriptions and handled speaker identification well. You can easily edit or reassign speaker labels, which many notetakers still miss. We gave it a 9/10 for transcription quality.

Fathom also makes sharing easy. You can send summaries and recordings to prospects or clients, with the option to revoke access later. It’s a useful feature for keeping everyone aligned while staying in control of what gets shared.

The only downside is that the platform can feel a bit overwhelming at first. But for sales teams that want a powerful, customisable notetaker that fits cleanly into their workflow, Fathom is one of the best options available. We rated it 9/10 for overall functionality.

Want to know more? Get a full breakdown of Fathom's features and pricing.

Pros

  • Exceptional Transcription Accuracy and Editing

  • Powerful Search and Navigation Features

  • Robust Export and Sharing Options

  • Feature-Rich AI Note Generation

Cons

  • Limited Integration Capabilities

  • Limited File Upload Functionality

  • Poor User Interface Design

  • No Mobile Recording Capabilities

  • No discreet recording option

Best for teams needing high-quality audio in multilingual environments

Krisp product logo
Krisp

Stackfix Rating:

6.1 / 10

Visit website

Updated onApr 2, 2025

For remote teams in the EU where English isn’t everyone’s first language, Krisp is a strong option. It doesn’t offer all the advanced AI assistant features you’ll find in other tools, but what it does, it does really well – especially when it comes to audio quality and transcription accuracy.

Krisp’s core strength is audio control. Its noise cancellation removes background chatter, echoes, and other distractions, which is especially helpful for remote teams working from different environments. On Enterprise plans, Krisp also offers AI Accent Localization, which adjusts speaker accents in real time to make them easier to understand. This can make a big difference for international teams or customer-facing conversations across regions.

In our testing, Krisp’s transcription accuracy was excellent. You can edit transcripts and tweak speaker tags post-call, which many platforms still don’t support. We gave it a 9/10 for transcription quality.

It’s worth noting that Krisp doesn’t include an AI assistant, so you can’t ask questions or get summaries from your transcript. Its functionality is focused on recording, transcribing, and cleaning up audio – and it does those things very well. If your team values audio clarity and clean transcripts over bells and whistles, Krisp is a dependable, no-frills choice.

Want to know more? Get a full breakdown of Krisp's features and pricing.

Pros

  • Superior Audio Quality and Noise Cancellation

  • Polished User Interface

  • Highly Accurate Transcription

Cons

  • Poor AI Note Generation

  • No AI Assistant

  • Poor Integration Ecosystem

  • Limited Customization Options

  • Basic Customer Support

Best for analyzing meeting engagement and performance

Read AI product logo
Read AI

Stackfix Rating:

5.5 / 10

Visit website

Updated onApr 2, 2025

Read AI is a great fit for remote teams in the EU that want to go beyond basic note-taking and actually understand how their meetings are going. It tracks a range of engagement metrics, including speaker participation, attention levels, sentiment, charisma, and even bias – giving teams real insights into meeting performance.

One of its most useful features is the ‘For You’ page, which highlights key takeaways, action items, top questions, and a section called ‘What You Missed’ – a smart way to stay in the loop if you couldn’t make a meeting. It helps cut through the noise and keeps everyone aligned, even across time zones or busy schedules.

In our testing, Read AI was fully GDPR compliant, which is important for EU-based teams. We gave it a 10/10 for tracking engagement and performance metrics – it’s one of the most insightful tools we’ve reviewed in that area.

There are some limitations. Read AI doesn’t have an AI assistant, so you can’t ask questions or dig deeper into transcripts like you can with some other platforms. And while it offers solid core features – like transcription, mobile support, and file uploads – its functionality is more focused than full-featured. We rated it 7/10 overall for functionality.

But if you’re looking to improve how your team runs meetings, Read AI offers actionable insights that can make a real difference – without adding extra complexity.

Want to know more? Get a full breakdown of Read AI's features and pricing.

Pros

  • Effective Automated Sharing

  • Excellent File Sharing Capabilities

  • Outstanding Engagement Analytics

  • Strong Cross-meeting Insights

  • Robust Integration Ecosystem

Cons

  • Severely Limited Customization Options

  • Cluttered and Overwhelming Interface

  • Steep Learning Curve

  • No AI Assistant Capabilities

  • Limited Speaker Tag Editing

Best for ease of use

Grain product logo
Grain

Stackfix Rating:

8.6 / 10

Visit website

Updated onApr 2, 2025

Grain is one of the best AI notetakers for remote teams in the EU thanks to its clean design and thoughtful user experience. It strikes a rare balance – polished enough for heavy users, simple enough for casual ones, and flexible enough for both individuals and teams.

In our testing, we found that many AI notetakers tend to over-index in one area and fall short in others. Grain doesn’t. It’s well-rounded, with intuitive flows for recording meetings, inviting the bot, and quickly reviewing assigned action items. Day-to-day use feels smooth and considered.

That said, the interface has a few quirks. Some icons are unlabelled, and certain workflows – like organising past notes – could be clearer. But overall, the platform feels stable and user-friendly. We rated Grain 9/10 for ease of use, which puts it among the top in this category.

The simplicity does come with trade-offs. Grain doesn’t offer advanced features like cross-meeting insights or trend summaries. Its search is also limited – if you don’t know which meeting something was said in, it can take a bit of digging to find it.

Still, for remote teams looking for a reliable, easy-to-use notetaker that delivers strong core functionality without adding complexity, Grain is a well-built and dependable choice. It’s simple, thoughtful, and does the basics very well.

Want to know more? Get a full breakdown of Grain's features and pricing.

Pros

  • Superior Transcription Control

  • Exceptional User Interface and Experience

  • Powerful Search and Organization Features

  • Comprehensive Export and Integration Options

  • Highly Customizable Platform

Cons

  • No mobile recording capability

  • No weekly email summaries

  • No cross-meeting AI insights

  • Limited task management integration

  • No discreet recording option

How we test products

With AI Notetaking tools becoming increasingly essential for businesses, we focus on identifying the best options for small and midsize teams. Our evaluation process reflects real-world usage, prioritizing functionality, ease of use, and overall value. Here’s how we do it:

Functionality

AI Notetaking software should do more than just transcribe—it should capture key insights, summarize discussions, and enhance productivity. We start by identifying key use cases—meeting transcription, summarization, action item extraction, and collaboration—then test how well each platform delivers on these needs. Tools that provide high accuracy and useful summaries without unnecessary complexity score highest.

User Experience & Onboarding

A great AI Notetaking tool should be intuitive and frictionless. We test each platform’s interface by navigating core features without prior training and track onboarding time—from account setup to first meeting capture. Platforms that require extensive setup or manual adjustments lose points.

Accuracy & AI Capabilities

AI-powered transcription and summarization must be reliable. We evaluate speech-to-text accuracy, language understanding, and summarization quality. We also test whether AI-generated action items and key takeaways are actually useful or just generic outputs.

Integrations & Compatibility

AI Notetaking tools should work seamlessly with video conferencing platforms, project management software, and CRMs. We test how well each tool integrates with essential business systems and assess whether native integrations or third-party connectors are required.

Pricing & Value

We compare pricing across competitors, analyzing what each plan includes and whether critical features are locked behind paywalls. Hidden costs—such as per-minute transcription fees, premium AI features, or required enterprise plans—are factored into our assessment. Platforms that offer strong core functionality at a fair price score highest.

Stackfix’s Fit Score

All of these factors contribute to Stackfix’s Fit Score, a proprietary ranking system that measures how well each AI Notetaking tool aligns with a buyer’s needs. It combines two key elements:

  • Requirements Met – How many buyer requirements the software fulfills
  • Stackfix Rating – Our expert assessment of the software’s overall quality, usability, and value

The result? A clear, data-driven recommendation that helps businesses choose the right AI Notetaking software—without hours of trial and error.

FAQs

What is an AI Notetaker?

An AI notetaker is a tool that automatically transcribes, summarizes, and organizes meeting notes, helping individuals and teams capture key insights without manual effort. These platforms use AI-powered speech recognition and natural language processing (NLP) to turn conversations into structured, searchable notes—making it easier to recall action items, decisions, and important discussions. The key features of an AI notetaker usually include:

  • Real-Time Transcription: AI-powered tools that capture and transcribe meetings in real time, ensuring accuracy across different accents, languages, and speaking styles.
  • Summarization & Action Items: AI-generated meeting summaries, key takeaways, and action items to help users quickly digest discussions without reviewing full transcripts.
  • Speaker Identification: Ability to differentiate speakers and attribute statements correctly, making transcripts more readable and actionable.
  • Collaboration & Sharing: Easy sharing of meeting notes, highlights, and recordings with team members via integrations with email, Slack, or project management tools.
  • Search & Organization: AI-powered keyword detection, tagging, and smart search to help users quickly find relevant past discussions and decisions.

What should I consider when buying an AI notetaker?

Choosing the right AI notetaker can transform how you capture, organize, and act on information—so it’s essential to find one that fits your workflow, integrations, and budget. Here are the key factors to consider before making your decision.

  1. Your Use Case. Start by identifying how you’ll use the AI notetaker. Do you need a tool for team meetings, customer calls, brainstorming sessions, or legal/compliance documentation? Different platforms specialize in different areas, so choosing one tailored to your needs ensures better accuracy and relevant features.
  2. Ease of Use. An AI notetaker should simplify workflows, not add complexity. Look for a tool that’s easy to set up, requires minimal training, and integrates smoothly with your existing tools. Platforms that require manual corrections or frequent troubleshooting will slow you down.
  3. Integration with Your Workflow. Your AI notetaker should fit seamlessly into your workflow. If you use Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Slack, or Notion, check whether the tool offers native integrations or requires manual workarounds. A good AI notetaker should automatically sync notes with project management, CRM, or documentation tools.
  4. Summarization & AI Quality. Not all AI-generated summaries are equal. Some tools produce concise, high-quality summaries, while others generate long, unstructured text that still requires manual editing. Test how well the AI captures key points, assigns action items, and differentiates between general discussion and critical decisions.
  5. Scalability & Collaboration. If you’re using an AI notetaker for a growing team, ensure it supports multiple users, shared workspaces, and role-based permissions. The best tools allow for collaborative editing, team comments, and centralized access to past notes.
  6. Pricing & Hidden Costs. AI notetaker pricing varies based on transcription limits, team seats, storage, and premium AI features. Check for hidden costs, such as:
  7. Limits on meeting hours per month
  8. Extra fees for advanced AI-generated summaries
  9. Costs for exporting transcripts or integrating with premium tools
  10. Storage limits and add-ons for long-term transcript access
  11. Customer Support & Reliability. Since AI notetakers handle critical business meetings, fast and reliable support is important. Check if the vendor offers 24/7 chat support, email response times, and self-service knowledge bases. A downtime-prone or buggy AI tool can result in lost notes and frustration.

What are the common mistakes to avoid when choosing an AI notetaker?

Avoiding common pitfalls when selecting an AI notetaker can save you time, frustration, and missed insights. Here are some of the biggest mistakes teams make - and how to avoid them.

  1. Prioritizing price over accuracy. A cheap AI notetaker with poor transcription quality will cost you more time in manual corrections than a premium tool with high accuracy.
  2. Assuming all integrations work flawlessly. Some tools claim to integrate with Zoom, Slack, or CRMs, but may require manual exports or unreliable third-party connectors. Always test integrations.
  3. Overlooking search functionality. If you plan to reference old meeting notes, look for a tool with advanced search, keyword tagging, and filters. Poor search capabilities make finding past discussions difficult.
  4. Ignoring privacy & security. AI notetakers handle sensitive business conversations, so check data encryption, compliance certifications (GDPR, SOC 2), and storage policies.
  5. Choosing a tool that doesn’t scale. A notetaker that works well for a solo user may not support team-wide collaboration, shared notes, or enterprise compliance features.


How much does AI Notetaking Software typically cost?

Most AI notetaker solutions range from $10-75 per user monthly, with entry-level options starting around $10-20 and premium solutions exceeding $75 monthly. Most vendors structure pricing in tiers based on features and meeting volume, so be sure to enter your requirements as accurately as possible in our pricing calculator.

Many providers offer free plans with core functionality for personal use and very small teams but restrict meeting length (typically 15-30 minutes), transcription hours (2-5 hours monthly), or available features. Otter, Fireflies, and Notion AI all provide capable free tiers that can handle basic note-taking needs without cost. For personal users who only need occasional meeting notes, these free tiers are often sufficient.

The free tier trend is particularly strong in this market, with most major players offering a no-cost entry point to attract individual users who may later upgrade or bring the tool into their workplace. While these free versions typically limit advanced features like custom AI analysis, speaker identification, or integration capabilities, they provide enough functionality for personal productivity.

For enterprise plans and above, you can expect to speak to sales for a bespoke price. These custom quotes typically factor in integration needs, security requirements, and user volume discounts. To skip the demo calls, be sure to check out our pricing calculator.

Compare other AI Notetakers

View our comparisons of other AI Notetaking