logo
Search for anything...
About

ActiveCampaign vs Close - Comparison 2025

ActiveCampaign vs. Close

Last updated on

Reviewed by Paddy Stobbs

Stackfix Co-Founder & CEO

PS

ActiveCampaign and Close serve distinctly different needs in the sales engagement space. ActiveCampaign excels in email marketing automation with sophisticated features like A/B testing and conditional logic, making it ideal for marketing-focused teams that prioritize email campaigns. Its superior customer support and intuitive drag-and-drop interface make it more accessible for non-technical users.

Conversely, Close stands out with its powerful native phone dialer, AI call analysis, and stronger customization capabilities, making it better suited for sales teams heavily focused on phone outreach. Both platforms lack a native prospecting database, requiring integration with external tools for lead generation.

ActiveCampaign Product Logo

Advantages of ActiveCampaign

ActiveCampaign offers more advanced email sequence capabilities than Close
While both platforms support email sequences, ActiveCampaign provides additional features like A/B testing and conditional logic that Close lacks. This makes it more suitable for teams that need sophisticated email campaign optimization.
ActiveCampaign is significantly better at customer support than Close
We found ActiveCampaign's support to be more accessible and responsive, with live chat available during extended hours (3am-11pm CT) compared to Close's email-only support. This is particularly valuable for teams that need immediate assistance with their sales engagement platform.
ActiveCampaign provides a more intuitive sequence building experience than Close
ActiveCampaign offers a drag-and-drop sequence builder that Close doesn't have, making it easier for non-technical users to create and modify outreach sequences. This is particularly valuable for marketing teams that frequently adjust their campaigns.
Close Product Logo

Advantages of Close

Close is significantly better at phone outreach than ActiveCampaign
While ActiveCampaign lacks phone capabilities entirely, Close offers a powerful native dialer with AI call transcript analysis and whisper coaching features. This is particularly valuable for sales teams that rely heavily on phone outreach as their primary communication channel.
Close has a notably better user interface than ActiveCampaign
Close offers a modern, fast-loading interface compared to ActiveCampaign's frustratingly slow page loads. This makes a significant difference for sales teams who need to move quickly between tasks throughout the day.
Close has better email functionality with multiple email address support
Unlike ActiveCampaign, Close supports multiple email addresses through inbox rotation, which is crucial for teams running high-volume outreach campaigns who need to maintain good deliverability.
Close offers superior customization capabilities compared to ActiveCampaign
Close provides more extensive customization options for fields, workflows, and pipeline stages, plus granular custom filters for sequences. This is particularly valuable for teams needing to adapt the platform to specific sales processes.

ActiveCampaign is best for

  • Businesses with marketing teams transitioning into sales operations
  • Who need powerful email sequence automation with AI-assisted content creation
  • And/or who need comprehensive pipeline tracking and analytics within their CRM

Close is best for

  • Businesses with sales teams focused on phone outreach
  • Who need powerful CRM capabilities alongside their outreach tools
  • And/or who need an intuitive, modern interface that's quick to master

ActiveCampaign is less good for

  • Businesses with high-volume prospecting requirements
  • Who need advanced phone outbound capabilities
  • And/or who need fast-loading interfaces for high-volume work

Close is less good for

  • Businesses with prospecting-heavy sales motions that need a native contact database
  • Who need advanced sequence automation like conditional branching and A/B testing
  • And/or who need strong native integrations with tools like LinkedIn, Outlook, or Apollo

Gallery

ActiveCampaign logoActiveCampaign
ActiveCampaign screenshot
Close logoClose
Close screenshot

Pricing, features & ratings

ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

Starting at

$15

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Close logo

Close

Starting at

$29

user / month

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
6

Functionality

6/10

<p>ActiveCampaign is a fairly basic email outbound tool that also packages a decently strong native CRM. As such if these are the areas you're focused on, then the tool covers the basics well. However, it lacks any kind of native prospecting database and offers no support for core channels such as phone outbound - so if you need these, you're better off looking elsewhere.</p>
7

Functionality

7/10

<p>Close is primarily a CRM. That being said it does offer fairly strong multi-channel (email, phone, SMS) outbound capabilities. It's native dialer and adjacent functionalities are particularly strong. Additionally, given its focus as a CRM, it excels in areas such as pipeline tracking and deal management.</p>
Ease of Use
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">It would take an average small business employee less than an hour to properly figure out the functionalities of this software - a great learning curve if you ask us. The layout is also extremely intuitive, making this a beginner-friendly piece of software.</span></p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Though Close is focused on power users, we were pleased by how intuitive the platform is to use. It's core sequencing interface is very well presented and familiar. Additionally, even more advanced features such as call transcript analysis are very well presented and not overwhelming. It would take an average SMB employee around 30 minutes to master its use.</p>
Look and feel
4

Look and feel

4/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">We found ActiveCampaign's interface to generally be intuitive, especially with regards to sequencing and email drafting. However, the frustratingly slow loading times (more than 4 seconds in many cases) can be a real deal-breaker.</span></p>
8

Look and feel

8/10

<p>When compared with most tools in the sales engagement space, Close presents itself as one of the best designed and easiest to use tools on the market. Though lacking in colour, we appreciated its modern aesthetic and fast page load times.</p>
Customisability
5

Customisability

5/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">ActiveCampaign offers the usual channels around customization including things like setting up custom workflows, using their AI to draft sequences etc. However, we would like to see more granularity when it comes to making custom reports and dashboards from an analytics perspective.</span></p>
8

Customisability

8/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Close offers significant customization for fields, workflows, and pipeline stages. You can create custom data objects to track items beyond people and companies, such as partnerships. It also supports extremely granular custom filters to target contacts and leads when setting up sequences.</span></p>
Ease of Setup
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>ActiveCampaign offers a self-serve trial –&nbsp;it takes around 10-20 minutes to finish basic setup, and fully customising workflows takes 1-2 days at most. We especially appreciated how easy it was to use AI to draft sequences and emails despite the lack of proper templates.</p>
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Close offers a free trial without need to speak to sales. Completing basic setup is simple, taking around 10 minutes to import contacts and set up pipelines. However, fully setting up the platform and upskilling your reps can take up to a week, given Close's powerful and rich outbound functionality.</span></p>
Customer Support
8

Customer Support

8/10

<p>The primary channel for support is live chat. When tested, we found response times to be swift (when in working hours which are <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">3am-11pm CT) and helpful. Additionally, ActiveCampaign also provide a decent support centre too.</span></p>
7

Customer Support

7/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">You can only contact Close's support team via email, however the team is often helpful and replies within 15 minutes. Close also offers a lot of helpful onboarding guidance and high quality self-help resources.</span></p>
Integratability
7

Integratability

7/10

<p>ActiveCampaign offers a fairly large array of integrations which covers most of the tooling you'd expect (HubSpot is notably absent). That being said, we would like to have seen native integrations with more prospecting databases such as Apollo (though this can be configured through an automation platform like Zapier).</p>
4

Integratability

4/10

<p>Close lacks native integrations with a lot of tools we'd like to have seen such as Apollo or other prospecting databases. That being said, we did appreciate the integration with Zapier through which you are able to connect to a much broader array of tooling.</p>
Ease of Migration
6

Ease of Migration

6/10

<p>ActiveCampaign offers self serve export functionality directly within its web app. Additionally, it offers an API through which you can interact with data on the platform programatically too.</p>
7

Ease of Migration

7/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Close allows users to export key data via self-serve. Export of most other data is also available via API or on request.</span></p>
Loading...

Compare other Sales Engagement Platforms

Want to find out how ActiveCampaign or Close stacks up with their competitors?