logo
Search for anything...
About

ActiveCampaign vs Woodpecker - Comparison 2025

ActiveCampaign vs. Woodpecker

Last updated on

Reviewed by Paddy Stobbs

Stackfix Co-Founder & CEO

PS

ActiveCampaign and Woodpecker serve distinctly different market segments within the sales engagement space. ActiveCampaign is better suited for growing businesses needing a comprehensive solution combining CRM capabilities with robust email automation, AI-powered features, and detailed analytics. Its superior customer support and workflow automation make it ideal for teams scaling their sales operations.

Woodpecker, on the other hand, is more appropriate for small businesses seeking a basic email outreach tool with simple functionality. While Woodpecker offers a native prospecting database (albeit basic), ActiveCampaign compensates with stronger integration capabilities and more sophisticated features.

ActiveCampaign Product Logo

Advantages of ActiveCampaign

ActiveCampaign is significantly better at analytics and tracking than Woodpecker
While Woodpecker offers only basic email metrics with limited customization, ActiveCampaign provides comprehensive analytics including deal tracking and pipeline management. This is particularly valuable for sales teams who need detailed insights into their outreach performance and deal progression.
ActiveCampaign offers superior customer support compared to Woodpecker
ActiveCampaign provides swift response times during working hours (3am-11pm CT) through live chat, while Woodpecker's response times can vary from 30 minutes to hours. This makes ActiveCampaign a better choice for teams requiring reliable, responsive support.
ActiveCampaign has better AI capabilities than Woodpecker
ActiveCampaign includes AI-powered features for email personalization and sequence drafting, while Woodpecker lacks any AI functionality. This makes ActiveCampaign more efficient for teams looking to scale their personalized outreach.
ActiveCampaign has better workflow automation than Woodpecker
ActiveCampaign offers task automation and reminder features that Woodpecker lacks, making it more suitable for teams needing sophisticated workflow automation. This is particularly valuable for larger sales teams managing complex sales processes.
Woodpecker Product Logo

Advantages of Woodpecker

Woodpecker is notably better at native prospecting than ActiveCampaign
While Woodpecker's native prospecting database is basic, it at least provides one, whereas ActiveCampaign completely lacks this functionality. This is particularly valuable for sales teams who need a built-in solution for lead generation without requiring additional third-party tools.
Woodpecker provides better email infrastructure support than ActiveCampaign
Woodpecker includes email warmup services while ActiveCampaign does not, which is essential for teams who need to properly prepare their email domains for outbound campaigns to ensure optimal deliverability.

ActiveCampaign is best for

  • Businesses with marketing teams transitioning into sales operations
  • Who need powerful email sequence automation with AI-assisted content creation
  • And/or who need comprehensive pipeline tracking and analytics within their CRM

Woodpecker is best for

  • Businesses with straightforward email and SMS outreach requirements
  • Who need quick setup and deployment of outreach campaigns
  • And/or who need basic email performance tracking without complex analytics

ActiveCampaign is less good for

  • Businesses with high-volume prospecting requirements
  • Who need advanced phone outbound capabilities
  • And/or who need fast-loading interfaces for high-volume work

Woodpecker is less good for

  • Businesses with sophisticated multi-channel outreach requirements beyond email and SMS
  • Who need advanced prospecting capabilities and high-quality contact data
  • And/or who need extensive analytics, customization options, and power-user features

Gallery

ActiveCampaign logoActiveCampaign
ActiveCampaign screenshot
Woodpecker logoWoodpecker
Woodpecker screenshot

Pricing, features & ratings

ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

Starting at

$15

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Woodpecker logo

Woodpecker

Starting at

$29

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
6

Functionality

6/10

<p>ActiveCampaign is a fairly basic email outbound tool that also packages a decently strong native CRM. As such if these are the areas you're focused on, then the tool covers the basics well. However, it lacks any kind of native prospecting database and offers no support for core channels such as phone outbound - so if you need these, you're better off looking elsewhere.</p>
5

Functionality

5/10

<p>Woodpeckers functionality is quite basic. From a channel perspective, you're only really getting email and SMS support (LinkedIn requires an external integration). And though we appreciated the native prospecting database, we found it to be very simplistic and of fairly low quality.</p>
Ease of Use
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">It would take an average small business employee less than an hour to properly figure out the functionalities of this software - a great learning curve if you ask us. The layout is also extremely intuitive, making this a beginner-friendly piece of software.</span></p>
6

Ease of Use

6/10

<p>Given its limited functionality, Woodpecker is broadly a simple tool to use. Our only complaint is that many of its interfaces were unintuitive and non-standard (such as its main sequence building interface and its prospecting database interface).</p>
Look and feel
4

Look and feel

4/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">We found ActiveCampaign's interface to generally be intuitive, especially with regards to sequencing and email drafting. However, the frustratingly slow loading times (more than 4 seconds in many cases) can be a real deal-breaker.</span></p>
4

Look and feel

4/10

<p>Woodpecker's design aesthetic, though modern and light, does feel somewhat unusual. There's a lot of whitespace on pages meaning you'll need to scroll a lot to use the product - it's definitely not for power users. Additionally, interfaces were often unusual and unintuitive to use.</p>
Customisability
5

Customisability

5/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">ActiveCampaign offers the usual channels around customization including things like setting up custom workflows, using their AI to draft sequences etc. However, we would like to see more granularity when it comes to making custom reports and dashboards from an analytics perspective.</span></p>
3

Customisability

3/10

<p>Woodpecker doesn't offer many avenues for customization. We would like to have seen more on offer from both an analytics and reports point of view but also we would like ot have seen more AI integration across the product too.</p>
Ease of Setup
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>ActiveCampaign offers a self-serve trial –&nbsp;it takes around 10-20 minutes to finish basic setup, and fully customising workflows takes 1-2 days at most. We especially appreciated how easy it was to use AI to draft sequences and emails despite the lack of proper templates.</p>
7

Ease of Setup

7/10

<p>Woodpecker offers a self-serve trial meaning you can sign up and use the product with little to no friction. Additionally, given the simplicity of the overall feature set, it only takes around an hour to set the whole product up with few avenues for additional customization beyond that.</p>
Customer Support
8

Customer Support

8/10

<p>The primary channel for support is live chat. When tested, we found response times to be swift (when in working hours which are <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">3am-11pm CT) and helpful. Additionally, ActiveCampaign also provide a decent support centre too.</span></p>
6

Customer Support

6/10

<p>Woodpecker primarily offers customer support via a live chat widget inside its web app. When tested, agents were helpful and answered questions concisely, however, response times varied from 30 minutes to hours in some cases.</p>
Integratability
7

Integratability

7/10

<p>ActiveCampaign offers a fairly large array of integrations which covers most of the tooling you'd expect (HubSpot is notably absent). That being said, we would like to have seen native integrations with more prospecting databases such as Apollo (though this can be configured through an automation platform like Zapier).</p>
5

Integratability

5/10

<p>Woodpecker offers integrations with some CRMs such as HubSpot and Pipedrive as well as connectors such as Zapier. We would like to have seen more native integrations with alternative prospecting databases such as Apollo.</p>
Ease of Migration
6

Ease of Migration

6/10

<p>ActiveCampaign offers self serve export functionality directly within its web app. Additionally, it offers an API through which you can interact with data on the platform programatically too.</p>
5

Ease of Migration

5/10

<p>Woodpecker offers self-serve export functionality from within its web app for contact and analytics data.</p>
Loading...

Compare other Sales Engagement Platforms

Want to find out how Woodpecker or ActiveCampaign stacks up with their competitors?