logo
Search for anything...
About

Adobe Acrobat vs Zoho Sign - Comparison 2025

Adobe Acrobat vs. Zoho Sign

Last updated on

Reviewed by Paddy Stobbs

Stackfix Co-Founder & CEO

PS

When comparing these eSignature solutions, Zoho Sign emerges as the more comprehensive option with superior workflow management, integration capabilities, and security features. It's best suited for businesses requiring complex signing workflows, multiple integrations, or strong security compliance.

Adobe Acrobat, while offering excellent field auto-detection and easier setup, is more appropriate for basic signing needs, particularly for existing Adobe users who don't require advanced features. The key differentiator is that Zoho Sign provides enterprise-grade features like bulk sending, document editing, and extensive integrations, while Adobe Acrobat offers a simpler but more limited eSignature solution.

Adobe Acrobat Product Logo

Advantages of Adobe Acrobat

Adobe Acrobat has superior field auto-detection compared to Zoho Sign
While Zoho Sign's auto-detection is good, Adobe Acrobat consistently and accurately places fields with better size and position optimization than Zoho Sign. This makes it particularly valuable for users who frequently convert existing documents into signable forms.
Adobe Acrobat offers easier document setup than Zoho Sign
Compared to Zoho Sign's setup process, Adobe Acrobat provides a more streamlined setup experience with fewer configuration steps required. This makes it more suitable for users who need to get started quickly with basic eSignature functionality.
Zoho Sign Product Logo

Advantages of Zoho Sign

Zoho Sign offers far better integration capabilities than Adobe Acrobat
Unlike Adobe Acrobat's limited integration options, Zoho Sign connects with major platforms including Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, and Slack through Zoho Flow, plus offers Zapier integration and API access. This makes it much more suitable for businesses needing to automate their document workflows across multiple platforms.
Zoho Sign is significantly more flexible for managing signing workflows than Adobe Acrobat
While Adobe Acrobat offers basic signing order capabilities, Zoho Sign provides superior flexibility with numbered signing orders, different roles (signer, in-person signer, witness, approver), custom reminder intervals, and the ability to attach private messages to each recipient. This makes it ideal for businesses with complex document workflows requiring multiple approvers or witnesses.
Zoho Sign provides superior security features compared to Adobe Acrobat
While Adobe Acrobat offers basic security, Zoho Sign provides more comprehensive security with ID verification, knowledge-based authentication (KBA), and One-Time Passwords for Phone and SMS. This makes it better suited for businesses requiring strong identity verification and compliance with standards like ISO 27001 and HIPAA.
Zoho Sign has better document management capabilities than Adobe Acrobat
Unlike Adobe Acrobat, Zoho Sign allows users to edit and re-send documents without voiding them, supports bulk sending, and offers auto-fill capabilities. This makes it more efficient for organizations handling high volumes of documents or requiring frequent document modifications.

Adobe Acrobat is best for

  • Businesses with straightforward document signing needs
  • Who need highly accurate automatic field detection and placement
  • And/or who need basic document security with audit trails but not advanced verification

Zoho Sign is best for

  • Businesses with complex document preparation needs
  • Who need flexible signing workflows with multiple roles and authentication options
  • And/or who need to collect payments during document signing

Adobe Acrobat is less good for

  • Businesses with complex document workflows requiring multiple integrations
  • Who need advanced reporting and analytics on document performance
  • And/or who need to edit and reissue documents after sending

Zoho Sign is less good for

  • Businesses with high-volume document tracking needs
  • Who need detailed analytics on signer engagement and completion rates
  • And/or who need a highly polished UI

Gallery

Adobe Acrobat logoAdobe Acrobat
Adobe Acrobat screenshot
Zoho Sign logoZoho Sign
Zoho Sign screenshot

Pricing, features & ratings

Zoho Sign logo

Zoho Sign

Starting at

$0

Converted from GBP

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
7

Functionality

7/10

<p>Adobe Acrobat is a good eSignature solution with amazing auto-field detection. It supports web forms, payment collection (via Braintree), and has a mobile app. However, it's not great for large-scale sending, as it lacks bulk send and auto-fill features. There's no witness or in-person signing, and reports are almost non-existent, offering minimal insights beyond document status. Security includes password protection and audit trails, but no ID verification or KBA.</p>
9

Functionality

9/10

<p>Zoho Sign provides a complete eSignature solution, supporting web forms and payment collection while signing. The drag-and-drop builder allows customization with validation and custom fields. Users can control signing order, delegation, e-witnessing, and in-person signing, with team permission management. However, reporting is limited, as Zoho Sign’s reports don’t track key insights like completion time or completion rate. Instead, it only categorizes documents by status (in progress, recalled, expired, completed, document type, etc.). Security features include password protection and ID verification.</p>
Ease of Use
6

Ease of Use

6/10

<p>The platform is easy to use, though advanced document preparation takes some learning. Its clean, modern design and excellent field auto-placement speed up document creation. However, it lacks bulk sending and auto-fill from integrations, limiting workflow efficiency. A file upload field eliminates the need for separate document requests, and payment collection is available via Adobe Acrobat. However, documents cannot be edited and resent without voiding, making corrections less seamless.</p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>The platform is easy to use, though advanced document preparation takes some learning. The clean, modern design and field auto-placement make document creation faster. The builder supports custom fields, so you can reuse validation across documents. Bulk sending, auto-reminders, and auto-fill from integrations help speed up workflows. A file upload field eliminates the need for separate document requests, and Zoho Sign allows payment collection through Zoho Checkout. Users can also edit and resend documents without voiding them, making corrections quick and simple.</p>
Look and feel
6

Look and feel

6/10

<p>Although Adobe Acrobat has a solid set of features, the interface is simple, modern, and has a nice theme. Navigation is straightforward, but it’s more of a file management platform than a typical layout for managing eSignature documents and tracking them. The drag-and-drop builder is easy to use.&nbsp;</p>
7

Look and feel

7/10

<p>Although Zoho Sign has a solid set of features, the interface feels functional but not the most refined. Navigation is straightforward, but some advanced controls could be better organized. The UI is modern but lacks polish in certain areas.</p><p>The drag-and-drop builder is easy to use but not as advanced as some competitors. The reports section categorizes documents by status (in progress, recalled, expired, completed etc.), but it lacks deeper insights like completion time or completion rate, making tracking less intuitive for high-volume users.</p>
Customisability
4

Customisability

4/10

<p>Adobe Acrobat handles basic e-signatures but lacks advanced customizability like e-witnessing and in-person signing, limiting signing flows. User roles cannot be customized, and with no Zapier or API access, creating custom workflows isn't possible.</p>
8

Customisability

8/10

<p>Zoho Sign offers flexibility with branding, field properties, signing order, and team permissions. It supports formula fields, custom fields, and conditional logic to show or hide objects based on inputs. In-person signing, e-witnessing, and signer delegation cover all signing flows. However, it lacks custom reports, a major limitation for businesses needing detailed insights. However, you can’t generate tailored reports or track key metrics beyond basic status views.</p>
Ease of Setup
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Adobe Acrobat offers a free trial with self-serve purchasing for all tiers except Acrobat Sign Solutions, a separate product with extended eSignature features. Onboarding is simple, allowing users to create eSignature documents in 5–10 minutes. Custom branding is easy to set up, and other integrations are quick to configure, but there's no Zapier or API access. Setting up reusable templates, security settings, and signer roles may take a few hours.</p>
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>Zoho Sign offers a free trial, with self-serve purchasing for all tiers except custom plans. The onboarding process is simple, allowing users to create eSignature documents within 5–10 minutes. Integrations like Salesforce, Google Drive, Dropbox, Stripe, PayPal, and Slack can be set up through Zoho Flow, reducing manual effort. Custom permission profiles and branding are easy to configure. Despite its many features, the help docs are well-organized and detailed. Setting up reusable templates, security settings, and user roles takes a few hours, while enterprise-level setup may take 1–2 weeks.</p>
Customer Support
7

Customer Support

7/10

<p>Personalized Q&amp;A is available via phone, live chat, and request submission. Higher-tier plans get 24/7 support. Self-serve support includes a comprehensive Help Center and community forums with high-quality guides and tutorials.</p>
6

Customer Support

6/10

<p>Zoho Sign provides comprehensive customer support through email and 24/5 phone support for paid subscribers across multiple regions including the USA, India, and Australia. Their Help Center offers extensive resources including guides, documentation, FAQs, forums, and blogs. They also provide paid one-on-one training sessions for personalized assistance.</p>
Integratability
1

Integratability

1/10

<p>Integrations are severely limited, with only Google Drive and Dropbox supported. It doesn’t integrate with platforms like Salesforce or Slack, and there’s no Zapier or API access, making custom integrations nearly impossible.</p>
7

Integratability

7/10

<p>Zoho Sign integrates with major platforms through various methods. 1st-party integrations via Zoho Flow include Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Dropbox, Stripe, PayPal, and Slack. 3rd-party integrations are available for Google Drive (via Google Workspace Marketplace). Zoho Sign also offers Zapier integration for connecting to thousands of additional apps, and provides an API for custom integrations and automation.</p>
Ease of Migration
2

Ease of Migration

2/10

<p>Adobe Acrobat offers minimal data export options, partly due to no Zapier or API access. Finished documents and audit trails can be exported as PDFs, and another major drawback is the lack of downloadable reports for tracking insights across multiple documents.</p>
7

Ease of Migration

7/10

<p>Zoho Sign offers multiple ways to export completed document data. Finished documents can be exported as PDFs, audit trails are available in CSV format. A wide range of reports can be downloaded as CSV or PDF. Some native CRM integrations allow easy data syncing, and additional data can be exported through the API for further customization and automation.</p>
Loading...

Compare other eSignature Tools

Want to find out how Zoho Sign or Adobe Acrobat stacks up with their competitors?