| Functionality | 7 <p>Airtable offers most of the functionality that companies will need but lacks a few useful features. Users will benefit from strong workflow automations, dependencies, the ability to link tasks, projects, key metrics and company goals, forms which auto populate spreadsheets with responses and more. However, Airtable lacks in-real-time collaboration, the ability to create internal documents and some strong time-tracking features.</p> | 6 <p>Teamwork offer most functionalities that SMBs will require but lacks some more sophistic customisation features useful to larger businesses.</p><p><span style="background-color: rgba(245, 245, 245, 0.5); color: rgb(55, 65, 81);">Teamwork has rich functionality natively. Most notably, strong automation, customizable forms, time-tracking (with approval capabilities), excellent reporting and analytics, and even invoice creation. These features mean teams do not have to reply much on external integrations to reduce friction and enhance productivity.</span></p><p><br></p><p>However, some key features are missing. Chief amongst these are the lack of document creation features and missing project view options. Documents can only be imported for your device - so no customisation and no document templates. All of this work must be done externally, which is particularly painful when it comes to editing documents and sending them back to others. Only 4 project views are available - a timeline view would be useful to view task deadlines concurrently.</p> |
| Ease of Use | 6 <p>Airtable is generally easy to use. We estimate that an average start-up employee would require around half a day and some guidance to proficiently use all key functionalities of the platform. The notable exceptions to this are the extensions required to make custom reports and creating subtask in table view.</p><p><br></p><p>Airtables key processes are easy to find and do not require many clicks to reach. Some more complex processes like customizing the UI itself can be more hidden.</p> | 7 <p>Teamwork is generally easy to use. Some more complex features (e.g. creating an invoice) are harder to find but these are minimal and the demo videos and self service materials are supplement your learning very well.</p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">We estimate that an average start-up employee would require around 1 day and some guidance to proficiently use all key features of the product. </span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">It is easy to locate key info and processes are generally intuitive (especially given that so much of the UI works with drag and drop). Some views and features are often hidden in 'more' tabs which could be displayed more effectively. e.g. The Gantt view of task management.</span></p> |
| Look and feel | 8 <p>Airtable has a more customizable UI than most. You can alter colour and some layout features vai their interface designer. However, inevitably, UIs will not differ so much from one user to the next. They could all still have more sleep designs and more colour.</p><p><br></p><p>Loading times are fast (1 second per page).</p> | 6 <p>Teamwork is visually acceptable and geared more towards functionality. The lack of colour makes the UI plain and feel monotone. </p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>The loading times are generally fast (~1 second), however some functions (like generating dashboards take slightly longer (~2.5 seconds).</p> |
| Customisability | 8 <p>Airtable has strong customizability. Automations integrate with third parties and offer a decent selection of action/ trigger functions, as well as, conditional logic. Highly customizable forms also allow for conditional logic, many answer types and cosmetic customizations like banners, logos and colours. Out-of-the-box reporting extensions also allow for customizable reports.</p> | 6 <p>Where Teamwork offers customisation, it is generally strong. However, it lacks some key customisations useful to businesses of all sizes.</p><p>Teamwork offers great workflow automation customisations. 'If then' logic and a large range of trigger and action functions mean that a vast array of automations are available to increase your team's efficiency. Custom reporting is also very strong with filtering options by custom tag allowing for very specific insights to be gained.</p><p><br></p><p>However, the lack of document customisation (as you cannot create documents) and only having for 4 task management views available will increase the friction and time spent on bureaucratic tasks like formatting documents or prioritizing between tasks.</p> |
| Ease of Setup | 8 <p>Offers a self-serve free trial and allows purchase without needing to talk to sales. Getting started and setting up a few tasks and subtasks should take 20-30 minutes, because it has a very rich library of templates. Full setup should take less than a day.</p> | 9 <p>Offers a self-serve free trial and allows purchase without needing to talk to sales. Getting started and setting up a few tasks and subtasks should take 20-30 minutes, because it has a very rich library of templates, especially for marketing. Full setup should take less than a day.</p> |
| Customer Support | 7 <p>An in-app chatbot is useful for filtering through self-serve material, but if you want to talk to a real human you need to do this via email (not that forms can be submitted via email) and agents will reply within 48 hours - but usually in less than 12 hours.</p><p><br></p><p>Airtable's self-serve materials are excellent. Articles, videos and seminars all have excellent depth and quality. These can all be access in app.</p> | 8 <p>Personalised Q&A is available over email only. But agents are helpful and reply fast (<2 hours).</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>Excellent self-serve materials with strong depth and quality. Their demo videos and help section (available in app and online) are excellent if you trouble using or finding any key or advanced workflows.</p> |
| Integratability | 8 <p>Airtable only offers 36 native integrations which pails in comparison to other project management software - like Clickup or Asana. However, most of the big names are covered - like Jira, Github, Slack etc. Some integrations also include automations - e,g. sending messages in slack or creating a weekly digest in google documents.</p><p><br></p><p>Airtable also offer an API allowing users to build integrations where necessary.</p> | 8 <p>Teamwork's integrations are not exhaustive but still cover most integrations any SMB will need. These include some automation integrations through slack, Hubspot and others. Here you can set up automatic messages within these integrated software once and trigger has been completed within Teamwork.</p><p><br></p><p>Teamwork also has an API allowing teams to built their own custom integrations.</p> |
| Ease of Migration | 8 <p>Exports of key and custom data and reports are available self-serve via a CSV file.</p> | 8 <p>Teamwork offers a large number of pre-built and custom reports which are all available for exporting mostly to pdf or CSV files. The number of reports available is extensive and the level of granularity retained when exporting is also impressive. This is in part due to Teamwork's excellent reporting of budgeting and profitability. Data visualisation tools (e.g. bar graphs and pie charts) can also all be exported.</p><p><br></p><p>Migrating to and from Teamwork from other project management tools is not possible.</p> |
