logo
Search for anything...
About

Asana vs Linear - Comparison 2025

Asana vs. Linear

Last updated on

Reviewed by Camin McCluskey

Stackfix Co-Founder & CTO

CM

Asana and Linear are both strong project management tools, but built for different types of teams.

Asana is a versatile, full-featured platform that works well for cross-functional teams managing complex projects. It offers multiple project views, extensive customization, and strong workload management, making it a good fit for organizations with varied workflows and collaboration needs.

Linear, by contrast, is built specifically for software development teams. It prioritizes speed, simplicity, and a smooth user experience, with a keyboard-first interface and excellent customer support. Asana suits teams looking for flexibility across departments, while Linear is better for fast-moving dev teams focused on execution.

Asana Product Logo

Advantages of Asana

Asana is significantly more versatile in project views
We found Asana offers 7 different project views (list, board, timeline, gantt, workload, calendar, overview) compared to Linear's limited 2 views. This versatility is crucial for teams that need different ways to visualize their work, especially for non-technical teams who may prefer timeline or calendar views over Linear's developer-focused interface.
Asana offers superior task customization
Unlike Linear's rigid task structure, Asana allows extensive task customization through custom fields, multiple assignees (via task duplication), and various task relationships. This flexibility is essential for teams that need to track specific data points or manage complex task dependencies.
Asana excels in automation capabilities
While Linear offers only pre-built automations, Asana provides a visual workflow builder that allows teams to create custom automations for each project. This is valuable for teams looking to streamline repetitive tasks and create custom workflows.
Asana provides better workload management
Asana's workload view allows teams to visualize and balance team capacity across projects, while Linear lacks this functionality entirely. This is crucial for project managers who need to prevent team burnout and ensure even work distribution.
Linear Product Logo

Advantages of Linear

Linear is significantly more elegant and faster to use
Linear's interface is beautifully designed with silky smooth transitions and lightning-fast page loads, making it more delightful to use than Asana. The keyboard-first approach, while requiring some learning, enables rapid task management through shortcuts. This is particularly valuable for fast-paced development teams who need to quickly capture and manage issues.
Linear offers superior customer support
Linear's support team provides quick responses (under 1 hour) and knowledgeable assistance, while Asana users often struggle with an unhelpful AI chatbot and limited direct support options. This difference is crucial for teams that need reliable technical assistance.
Linear has better data export capabilities
Linear provides more comprehensive data export options than Asana, with the ability to export all key data via self-serve CSV format, analytics module, or API. While Asana also offers exports, it has limitations with transferring comments and activity logs.

Asana is best for

  • Businesses with a high number of active projects (10+ projects at a time)
  • Who need sophisticated portfolio management and workload balancing across teams, like tracking project health and managing resource allocation
  • And/or who want to align project execution with company strategy through robust goal-tracking and status reporting

Linear is best for

  • Software development teams with a low to moderate number of active projects (3-10 projects at a time)
  • Who need excellent software development workflows with powerful GitHub integration and cycle planning
  • And/or who want beautiful, keyboard-first interface

Asana is less good for

  • Businesses with a very low number of active projects (1-2 projects at a time)
  • Who need highly customizable task relationships beyond basic dependencies, like assigning multiple owners to a single task
  • And/or who want advanced cross-project automation workflows with complex branching logic

Linear is less good for

  • Businesses with a very high number of active projects (15+ projects at a time)
  • Who need extensive workflow customization and flexible task management
  • And/ or need advanced time tracking, workload management, and custom field capabilities

Gallery

Asana logoAsana
Asana screenshot
Linear logoLinear
Linear screenshot

Pricing, features & ratings

Asana logo

Asana

Starting at

$0

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Linear logo

Linear

Starting at

$0

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
9

Functionality

9/10

<p>Asana offers almost all the functionality most companies need to manage tasks and projects effectively. It has rich functionality such as customisable forms, automation, time-tracking and anlalytics. For larger teams with multiple teams and projects, it also offers excellent portfolio management functionality.</p><p>However, it's missing the advanced customizability that the largest teams require to manage complex task and project relationships e.g. assigning multiple team members to a task or sophisticated automation workflows with branches.</p>
6

Functionality

6/10

<p>Linear focuses on delivering exceptional functionality required for planning and building software products. including excellent product planning, cycling planning and issue tracking functionality. However, this means that compared to other PM tools, Linear lacks some common functionality, e.g. timeline/ Gantt view for tasks, adding custom fields, time-tracking, an automations module.</p>
Ease of Use
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Asana balances functionality with a relatively intuitive interface, but it's not the simplest tool to use. There's a moderate learning curve due to the wide array of features, and compared to some of the tools we've tested and there are at times less templates available (e.g. for building automation). However, it generally does a good job guiding users throughout the platform e.g. linking projects to goals, navigating different customisation options on project views.</p>
9

Ease of Use

9/10

<p>Using Linear is a delight. Its keyboard-first design allows you to breeze through workflows with ease—most actions, like creating a new task, are just a single shortcut away (press “C,” and you’re good to go). With its streamlined functionality, finding key information and navigating core workflows feels intuitive. Thanks to its smooth onboarding process, most startup employees can feel comfortable with the platform in just 1-2 hours, even with minimal guidance.</p><p>That said, Linear isn’t the most beginner-friendly tool. For users less familiar with keyboard shortcuts, it can feel a bit daunting at first. Plus, it offers fewer templates and less in-app guidance compared to alternatives like Asana or Monday, which might leave some teams wishing for a little more hand-holding.</p>
Look and feel
8

Look and feel

8/10

<p>Asana features a clean, modern design with a visually appealing interface. Pages loads are acceptable (1-3 seconds) and Asana also sprinkles moments of delight in the user experience e.g. rainbow unicorns fly across your screen when tasks/ projects are marked complete!</p>
9

Look and feel

9/10

<p>If you like modern, minimalist app designs with a touch of elegance, then you will love Linear. Every Linear page is beautifully laid-out and colour-coded, every interaction &amp; transition is silky smooth, and page loads are lightning fast.</p>
Customisability
6

Customisability

6/10

<p>Asana provides a good level of customizability, allowing users to create custom fields, templates, and workflows to suit their team's needs. However, there are some limitations e.g. you're unable to link related tasks (that aren't dependent on one another), add multiple team members to a task etc. Unlike more flexible all-in-one tools, Asana is strictly a project management tool - each item must be a "task", which means you're can't use it for other use cases (e.g. HR - tracking employees, sales - tracking deals).</p>
4

Customisability

4/10

<p>Linear proudly admits that it is inflexible —and for good reason. They believe overly flexible software lets everyone create their own workflows, which eventually leads to chaos. For instance, you can’t add custom fields in Linear or build your own bespoke workflows. You’re also limited to just two task (or issue) views: board and list. It’s a “less is more” philosophy, designed to keep things simple and focused.</p>
Ease of Setup
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Offers a self-serve free trial and allows purchase without needing to talk to sales. Getting started and setting up a few tasks and subtasks should take 20-30 minutes, because it has a good library of templates for projects. Full setup should take less than a day.</p>
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Linear offers a self-serve free trial and lets you purchase directly—no need to deal with sales. If you're familiar with agile methodology, then setting up Linear should be a breeze since it anticipates everything you need, including sprints, Kanban board, and a backlog. You can get started with a project and a few tasks within 10-20 minutes, with full customization taking 1-2 hours.</p>
Customer Support
5

Customer Support

5/10

<p>For Asana users on lower tiers, you can contact support by submitting a ticket through its AI chatbot (which was unhelpful and frustrating to get through). However, Asana does have high quality help centre and community support.</p>
9

Customer Support

9/10

<p>Linear’s support team is easy to reach—you can submit a question directly in the app. When tested, their response time was impressive (under an hour), and the support agent was both knowledgeable and genuinely helpful.</p><p>The Linear team has also been open and responsive to feedback.</p>
Integratability
8

Integratability

8/10

<p>Asana has integrations with most relevant third party apps (e.g. CRM, time-tracking, invoicing marketing, developer tools etc). It also has an API for custom integrations.</p>
7

Integratability

7/10

<p>Linear might not boast the extensive list of integrations you’ll find with other project management tools, but it likely covers everything a tech startup needs for software development. The integrations it does offer are top-notch—high-quality and thoughtfully crafted. Plus, if you need something more specific, Linear provides an API for building custom integrations.</p>
Ease of Migration
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>Exporting key data out of Trello is relatively straightforward. You can simply export entire projects, with all your tasks, in JSON or CSV formats. However, note that not all data - such as comments, activity logs and attachments will transfer seamlessly. However, you can export other data via its API.</p>
9

Ease of Migration

9/10

<p>Linear makes it easy to export all your key data—workspace, team members, projects, and tasks—directly into CSV format through a self-serve option. You can also export data via its analytics module or by integrating with Google Sheets. For anything else, Linear’s API has you covered, giving you full control over exporting additional data.</p>
Loading...

Compare other Project Management Tools

Want to find out how Asana or Linear stacks up with their competitors?