logo
Search for anything...
About

Atlas vs Pylon - Comparison 2025

Atlas vs. Pylon

Last updated on

Reviewed by Paddy Stobbs

Stackfix Co-Founder & CEO

PS

Atlas and Pylon serve distinct customer support needs, with Atlas excelling in visual customer context through session recording and chat automation, while Pylon dominates in Slack-based support.

Atlas is better suited for product-led companies needing deep customer interaction insights, particularly those supporting web-based products. Pylon, however, is the clear choice for B2B companies heavily invested in Slack-based support channels. Both platforms have similar core ticketing capabilities, but their specializations make them suitable for different use cases.

Atlas Product Logo

Advantages of Atlas

Atlas is significantly better at providing customer context through session recording
Atlas offers unique session recording functionality that captures users' screens, mouse movements, and encountered bugs in real-time. Unlike Pylon, which only shows basic customer information, Atlas provides a comprehensive customer timeline view that forces teams to be customer-centric. This is particularly valuable for technical support teams who need to understand exactly how users interact with their product.
Atlas offers superior live chat customization
Atlas provides more intuitive live chat customization than Pylon, with clear settings for adjusting widget position, size, and color scheme without requiring code. While Pylon requires coding for basic customizations, Atlas maintains a better balance between power and ease of use, which is particularly important for teams without technical resources.
Atlas has better chatbot capabilities
Atlas offers a no-code chatbot builder that allows teams to create conversation flows, collect customer information, and create tickets automatically. In contrast, Pylon lacks a dedicated chatbot builder, making it less suitable for teams looking to automate initial customer interactions.
Pylon Product Logo

Advantages of Pylon

Pylon is significantly better at Slack integration
Pylon's Slack integration is far more sophisticated than Atlas's, offering automatic tracking of customer questions, real-time syncing of replies across channels, and in-Slack CSAT collection. While Atlas offers basic Slack functionality, Pylon's deep Slack integration makes it ideal for teams heavily reliant on Slack for customer support.
Pylon offers superior shared inbox organization
Pylon's shared inbox features AI-powered organization of related Slack threads, automatic Kanban board updates, and unique swimlane views. In contrast, Atlas's inbox requires manual navigation between tickets and lacks efficient ticket overview features, making Pylon more efficient for managing multiple conversations.
Pylon provides better analytics capabilities
Pylon offers more comprehensive analytics with custom reports, detailed dashboards, and extensive filtering options. Atlas's analytics are described as 'very basic' with limited filtering and no custom reporting capabilities, making Pylon better suited for teams needing detailed insights.
Pylon has superior Help Centre customization
Pylon offers more extensive Help Centre customization options, including version control and advanced analytics. Atlas's Help Centre customization is limited to basic changes like header images and colors, making Pylon better for teams wanting to maintain a distinct brand identity in their documentation.

Atlas is best for

  • Businesses with a low to moderate ticket volume (100-500 tickets per day)
  • Who need deep visibility into customer product usage through session recordings and comprehensive timeline views
  • And/or who want a customer-centric support tool with strong Slack integration for community-based support

Pylon is best for

  • Businesses with a low to moderate ticket volume (100-500 tickets per day)
  • Who need AI-powered Slack-first or Microsoft Teams-first customer support and intelligent ticket organization
  • And/or who want automated ticket categorization with AI tagging and kanban-style ticket management

Atlas is less good for

  • Businesses with a high ticket volume (500+ tickets per day) who need advanced workflow automation
  • Who need advanced analytics capabilities like custom reports and detailed agent performance metrics
  • And/or who need extensive Help Centre customization options beyond basic color and image changes

Pylon is less good for

  • Businesses with a high ticket volume (500+ tickets per day)
  • Who need support for multiple channels like phone, SMS, WhatsApp and social media
  • And/or who need chat automation workflows

Gallery

Atlas logoAtlas
Atlas screenshot
Pylon logoPylon

Pricing, features & ratings

Atlas logo

Atlas

Starting at

$19

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Pylon logo

Pylon

Starting at

$70

user / month

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
8

Functionality

8/10

<p>Atlas offers most of the support functionality that SMBs will need. It includes support for most channels, help centre creation, basic AI, automation and reporting functionality. It also uniquely offers "session recording" functionality, which allows you to view a video/ live session of a user using your web product.&nbsp;</p><p>However, it lacks more advanced features such as a chatbot builder, native phone and SMS support, advanced automation, and custom reporting. The product is still evolving, with features in beta.&nbsp;</p>
8

Functionality

8/10

<p>Pylon is "modern support platform for B2B companies". It offers a good range of features including support for email, live chat, ticket forms, Slack/ Teams and help centre. It also offers decent automation, AI and reporting functionality.</p><p>However, it lacks support for many channels (e.g. phone, socials) or custom objects.</p>
Ease of Use
8

Ease of Use

8/10

<p>Atlas has a gentle learning curve, and really shines with its efficient keyboard shortcuts that power users love. One of its best features is the customer timeline, which gives you a clear, chronological view of every client interaction at a glance. While everything flows nicely for shortcut users, those who prefer mouse navigation might find it frustrating that they can't see all tickets in a sidebar.</p>
8

Ease of Use

8/10

<p>Pylon has a relatively quick learning curve - an average employee should take 1-2 hours to familiarize themselves with the key workflows, with the bulk of that time spent on getting up to speed with how Slack/ Teams integration works.</p>
Look and feel
6

Look and feel

6/10

<p>Atlas has a modern, clean interface that is pleasing to use. However, the UI lacks the polish of more established competitors, and loading times can be comparatively slow, taking 2-3 seconds for some pages.</p>
6

Look and feel

6/10

<p>We find Pylon's interface to be clean and modern. However, some pages can be slow to load e.g. opening a ticket takes ~2 seconds, and the analytics dashboard can take &gt;5 seconds to load.</p>
Customisability
6

Customisability

6/10

<p>Atlas offers a standard level of customisability.</p><p>Users can create custom fields for customers, set up custom views, and track custom events. The live chat widget and chatbot builder have standard customization options.</p><p>However, it lacks more advanced customization features like custom objects, custom actions, and custom reports. Help Centre customization (style, layout) is particularly limited.</p>
8

Customisability

8/10

<p>Pylon offers good customization options including custom views, custom fields, and custom reporting (including the view of customer context within Account Management). A unique feature here is that users can create swimlane diagrams for Kanban views. However, it lacks more advanced customization features like creating custom data objects and tracking custom events.&nbsp;</p>
Ease of Setup
4

Ease of Setup

4/10

<p>Frustratingly, Atlas does not offer a self-serve free trial for its platform. Instead, you'll need to trudge through a sales demo before you can get access. However, the process is relatively short and smooth and once access was granted, we found the tool to be simple to set up and configure.</p>
5

Ease of Setup

5/10

<p>Frustratingly, Pylon does not offer a self-serve free trial on its website. Instead you'll need to trudge through a sales demo to access the platform. However, calls are generally short and often deals are often closed in just one call if you're looking to purchase right away. Once you're in, initial setup is very slick, taking less than 10 minutes. Additionally, given its Slack centricity, connecting core channels is a one-click process.</p>
Customer Support
9

Customer Support

9/10

<p>Atlas's customer support is excellent. They offer 24/7 in-app live chat with Atlas's team (including the founder!), who are always happy to provide friendly and personal help.</p>
9

Customer Support

9/10

<p>Pylon offers support via in-app live chat and Slack/ Teams. We've found the team helpful, and quick to respond. Pylon is also known for being very responsive to product feedback.</p>
Integratability
4

Integratability

4/10

<p>Atlas only has 15 pre-built integrations. While these integrations cover key areas like CRM (Salesforce, HubSpot, Close, Pipedrive) and calling (Aircall, Dialpad), it lacks integrations with popular tools in other categories such as project management, data enrichment, and surveys. It does offer an API for custom integrations.</p>
7

Integratability

7/10

<p>Pylon currently offers only 10 integrations, though they cover key areas like project management (JIRA, Linear, Asana) and CRM (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive). The recent addition of webhook support improves its integration capabilities. However, it still lacks integrations in categories like data enrichment, surveys, and marketing tools.&nbsp;It does offer an API for custom integrations.</p>
Ease of Migration
3

Ease of Migration

3/10

<p>Atlas's data export capabilities are somewhat limited. While reporting data for selected reports can be exported directly from within Atlas, most data seem only available for export via API. For example, tickets can only be exported as PDFs.</p>
5

Ease of Migration

5/10

<p>Pylon's data export capabilities appear to be limited. While users can export reports to CSV, it doesn't seem possible to self-export tickets.</p>
Loading...

Compare other Customer Support Tools

Want to find out how Pylon or Atlas stacks up with their competitors?