logo
Search for anything...
About

Circleback vs Fellow - Comparison 2025

Circleback vs. Fellow

Last updated on

Reviewed by Camin McCluskey

Stackfix Co-Founder & CTO

CM

Circleback and Fellow serve distinct needs in the AI notetaker market, with Circleback excelling in user experience and straightforward meeting documentation, while Fellow offers more comprehensive features but with greater complexity.

Circleback is better suited for teams prioritizing ease of use and clean meeting documentation, with its intuitive interface and streamlined functionality. Fellow, despite its more complicated interface, is better suited for enterprises needing extensive integrations and cross-meeting analytics, particularly those using multiple productivity tools and requiring detailed meeting insights across their organization.

Circleback Product Logo

Advantages of Circleback

Circleback provides more discreet recording options
Circleback offers more flexibility in recording meetings, with both bot-based and discreet desktop recording options. Fellow only supports bot-based recording, which may not be suitable for all meeting contexts.
Circleback offers more flexible speaker management
While both platforms have limitations with transcript editing, Circleback allows users to edit speaker tags throughout the transcript, albeit globally. Fellow does not offer speaker tag editing capabilities, which can be frustrating for teams needing to correct misidentified speakers.
Circleback is significantly more intuitive to use
We found Circleback's interface to be much cleaner and more user-friendly compared to Fellow's cramped and confusing navigation. The well-organized layout with subtle color highlighting makes it easy for teams to quickly find and access key meeting information, while Fellow's interface can feel overwhelming with its abundance of options.
Fellow Product Logo

Advantages of Fellow

Fellow is significantly more customizable for note templates
Fellow offers highly customizable note templates with a Notion-like editor, allowing teams to standardize meeting documentation formats. In contrast, Circleback lacks direct template customization, requiring workarounds through its automation system.
Fellow offers broader project management tool integration
Fellow integrates with more project management tools including Asana, ClickUp, and Google Docs, while Circleback lacks these integrations. This makes Fellow more versatile for teams using multiple project management platforms.
Fellow has superior BambooHR integration
Fellow stands out with its native BambooHR integration, making it one of the few AI notetakers offering this capability. Circleback does not offer BambooHR integration at all, making Fellow a better choice for HR teams using BambooHR.

Circleback is best for

  • Businesses with moderate meeting volume (10-20 meetings per week) who need basic AI transcription and note-taking capabilities
  • Who need automated workflows for tracking meeting insights and want easy integration with tools like Slack, HubSpot, and Salesforce
  • And/or who want a clean, intuitive interface for managing meeting recordings and need minimal training for team adoption

Fellow is best for

  • Businesses with high meeting volume (20-50 meetings per week) who need comprehensive meeting management
  • Who need advanced meeting analytics and performance tracking capabilities for team improvement
  • And/or who want extensive integration options with HR and project management tools like BambooHR and Asana

Circleback is less good for

  • Businesses with high meeting volume (20-50 meetings per week)
  • Who need advanced search capabilities and cross-meeting analytics
  • And/or who want extensive transcript editing capabilities and custom note templates

Fellow is less good for

  • Businesses with low meeting volume (5-10 meetings per week)
  • Who need to edit transcripts and speaker labels after meetings
  • And/or who need to record in-person meetings via mobile app

Gallery

Circleback logoCircleback
Circleback screenshot
Fellow logoFellow
Fellow screenshot

Pricing, features & ratings

Circleback logo

Circleback

Starting at

$25

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Fellow logo

Fellow

Starting at

$0

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
8

Functionality

8/10

<p>Most of the core AI notetaker functionality is present. It can record audio and video, transcribe accurately, and its AI insights are sufficient to answer most questions about the transcript and the themes or topics discussed in meetings. Another great feature is that insights generated from an automation, even across multiple meetings, are grouped together.</p><p>The main limitation is the inability to edit transcripts. Additionally, a more powerful search with better filtering options would be beneficial.</p>
7

Functionality

7/10

<p>Fellow offers most of the core AI notetaker features, including audio/video recording, customisable templates for summaries, meeting analytics, and an AI assistant. It includes an integrated calendar synced with your connected account, allowing you to view and schedule events directly. However, it has limitations, such as the inability to edit transcripts or speakers. Additionally, the app cannot record in-person meetings and only allows the bot to join impromptu meetings through a meeting link.</p>
Ease of Use
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Very easy to set up, especially with its dedicated automations page, which simplifies building workflows with triggers for key topics and information you want to gather from meetings, as well as managing how to share or store them afterward.</p><p><br></p><p>One downside is that while automation insights are customisable, they appear on a separate page, and custom templates cannot be applied to summarise individual meetings in a preferred format. The only option is to ask the AI assistant to regenerate the notes and then copy and paste them into the notes section.</p>
4

Ease of Use

4/10

<p>Fellow's navigation can be initially confusing, with an interface that’s less intuitive than other AI notetakers. While its core functionality is easy to use and comparable to similar tools, the abundance of options can feel overwhelming at first.</p>
Look and feel
8

Look and feel

8/10

<p>The interface is polished and simple, with well-chosen colours that subtly highlight important details while fading out less crucial ones. The AI assistant is conveniently located on the right side of the page when viewing meeting notes or recordings, making it easy to ask questions while reviewing meetings. The action items have their own dedicated page, which we found very useful. The insights page offers a condensed view, allowing for quick and easy access to multiple insights at a glance.</p>
4

Look and feel

4/10

<p>The navigation feels cramped and confusing at first, with some buttons appearing in multiple places. The overall layout is untidy and slightly overwhelming compared to other AI notetakers with cleaner, more organised interfaces.</p>
Customisability
7

Customisability

7/10

<p>The automations page makes it easy to set up Circleback to gather specific insights from meetings, with triggers that can be customised, and send these notes to the chosen integration or group them under the same folder within Circleback. There is limited control over who automatically receives the meeting notes via email (either yourself or all participants). Custom templates are not available for meeting notes, and the transcriptions cannot be edited.</p>
7

Customisability

7/10

<p>Fellow offers highly customisable note templates, similar to Notion, with AI insights. The meeting bot's name and background are also customisable.</p>
Ease of Setup
7

Ease of Setup

7/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls (card details required for trial). Template creation includes guided inputs via native workflow builder. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows via native builder take&nbsp;30-40 minutes.</p>
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Over 25 editable note templates with guided input creation. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows require Zapier but lack a rich library of Zapier templates, taking&nbsp;1-2 hours.</p>
Customer Support
8

Customer Support

8/10

<p>Has a help center with a wide range of support articles. In addition to the help center and a releases page explaining how features work, Circleback offers AI-enabled self-serve support within the product—users can ask questions (e.g., "How do I add others to my team?") and receive near-instant answers based on their internal body of knowledge. Live support is also available via email and, during business hours, through live chat with a human agent.</p>
7

Customer Support

7/10

<p>Has a Help Centre with a wide range of self-help articles, along with an in-app chat for speaking to a human agent, with typical response times of a few minutes.</p>
Integratability
8

Integratability

8/10

<p>Integrates with a good range of popular software, including a native integration with Zapier. They also have support for webhooks&nbsp;in automations, allowing far more customization and the ability&nbsp;to use multiple&nbsp;webhook integrations via automations instead of just one at the account-level. This also enables team-wide integrations&nbsp;since automations can be shared across a whole team or organization.</p>
7

Integratability

7/10

<p>Integrates with:</p><ul><li>Native Apps: macOS, iOS, Android</li><li>Video Conferencing: Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams</li><li>Automation: Slack, Zapier, ClickUp, monday.com, Trello, Asana, Linear</li><li>Knowledge Management: Notion, Confluence</li><li>CRM: Salesforce, HubSpot</li><li>Calendar Sync: Google Calendar, Microsoft 365 Calendar</li></ul>
Ease of Migration
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>Users can copy the transcript and download the meeting recording. Meetings can be shared via link or email, with teams created to manage access. The dedicated automation page simplifies sharing meeting notes through integrated apps and includes an option to set a webhook endpoint for receiving meeting data from Circleback. There is also support for providing link access automatically in the emails that are sent out either automatically or manually.</p>
6

Ease of Migration

6/10

<p>Meetings can be shared via email or link with access controls, and there are quick send options for Slack, Zapier, and exporting to Google Docs. The transcript and AI recap can be downloaded as .txt files, while the video is available for download as .mp4.</p>
Loading...

Compare other AI Notetakers

Want to find out how Circleback or Fellow stacks up with their competitors?