logo
Search for anything...
About

Circleback vs Supernormal - Comparison 2025

Circleback vs. Supernormal

Last updated on

Reviewed by Camin McCluskey

Stackfix Co-Founder & CTO

CM

Supernormal and Circleback serve distinct needs in the AI notetaking space. Supernormal excels in customization and AI capabilities, making it ideal for teams requiring highly structured meeting documentation and intelligent meeting insights. Its generous free tier and superior AI assistant make it particularly attractive for small teams and startups.

Circleback, meanwhile, better serves enterprises needing robust recording options and transcript management, with its desktop app, synchronized playback, and speaker tag editing features. However, its lack of a free tier and weaker AI capabilities make it less accessible to smaller organizations.

Circleback Product Logo

Advantages of Circleback

Circleback offers superior desktop app functionality
While Supernormal is web-only, Circleback provides both a desktop and menu bar app, enabling more flexible recording options. This is particularly valuable for teams who need to capture meetings without relying solely on browser-based solutions.
Circleback is significantly more polished in look and feel
We found Circleback's interface to be notably more refined, with thoughtful color choices that highlight important information while maintaining a clean aesthetic. The AI assistant's placement and dedicated action items page make for a more intuitive user experience compared to Supernormal's functional but basic design.
Circleback provides more flexible recording options
Unlike Supernormal which requires a bot for all recordings, Circleback allows discreet recording of screen and audio through its desktop app. This is crucial for teams who need to record meetings without visible bot presence.
Supernormal  Product Logo

Advantages of Supernormal

Supernormal is significantly better at customizing meeting summaries
We found Supernormal's customization options for meeting summaries to be far more extensive than Circleback's. Users can create custom summary types (from 'project challenges' to 'growth strategy') and arrange them in any order within templates. This is particularly valuable for teams that need consistent, structured meeting documentation across different types of meetings.
Supernormal offers a more generous free tier
While Circleback only offers a limited-time trial, Supernormal provides a substantial 1,000-minute free tier. This makes it much more accessible for small teams or individuals wanting to test the platform thoroughly before committing to a paid plan.
Supernormal has superior AI assistant capabilities
During our testing, Supernormal's AI assistant proved significantly more capable than Circleback's, scoring notably higher in accuracy and functionality. While Circleback's AI struggled with basic contextual questions, Supernormal's assistant accurately retrieved information and offered additional features like real-time meeting interaction through 'Norma' and customizable AI interviewer agents.

Circleback is best for

  • Businesses with moderate meeting volume (10-20 meetings per week) who need basic AI transcription and note-taking capabilities
  • Who need automated workflows for tracking meeting insights and want easy integration with tools like Slack, HubSpot, and Salesforce
  • And/or who want a clean, intuitive interface for managing meeting recordings and need minimal training for team adoption

Supernormal is best for

  • Businesses with moderate meeting volume (10-20 meetings per week)
  • Who need extensive customization options for meeting summary templates and AI interview agents
  • And/or who want strong integration capabilities

Circleback is less good for

  • Businesses with high meeting volume (20-50 meetings per week)
  • Who need advanced search capabilities and cross-meeting analytics
  • And/or who want extensive transcript editing capabilities and custom note templates

Supernormal is less good for

  • Businesses with high meeting volume (20-50 meetings per week)
  • Who want to record discretely without a visible bot
  • And/ or need editable transcripts and advanced analytics

Gallery

Circleback logoCircleback
Circleback screenshot
Supernormal  logoSupernormal
Supernormal  screenshot

Pricing, features & ratings

Circleback logo

Circleback

Starting at

$25

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Supernormal  logo

Supernormal

Starting at

$0

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
8

Functionality

8/10

<p>Most of the core AI notetaker functionality is present. It can record audio and video, transcribe accurately, and its AI insights are sufficient to answer most questions about the transcript and the themes or topics discussed in meetings. Another great feature is that insights generated from an automation, even across multiple meetings, are grouped together.</p><p>The main limitation is the inability to edit transcripts. Additionally, a more powerful search with better filtering options would be beneficial.</p>
5

Functionality

5/10

<p>Mostly offers core AI notetaking functionality: recording and transcribing meetings, uploading your own audio/video files for transcripts, but lacks a mobile app. It can't record without a meeting bot, lacks analytics, and its custom agents are still in early stages of development.</p>
Ease of Use
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Very easy to set up, especially with its dedicated automations page, which simplifies building workflows with triggers for key topics and information you want to gather from meetings, as well as managing how to share or store them afterward.</p><p><br></p><p>One downside is that while automation insights are customisable, they appear on a separate page, and custom templates cannot be applied to summarise individual meetings in a preferred format. The only option is to ask the AI assistant to regenerate the notes and then copy and paste them into the notes section.</p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Key workflows, like recording meetings and inviting the bot, are intuitive and straightforward, with the Chrome extension providing added convenience. However, the "Invite" buttons in the web app can be confusing at first—one is for inviting the bot to meetings, and the other is for inviting users to the app.</p>
Look and feel
8

Look and feel

8/10

<p>The interface is polished and simple, with well-chosen colours that subtly highlight important details while fading out less crucial ones. The AI assistant is conveniently located on the right side of the page when viewing meeting notes or recordings, making it easy to ask questions while reviewing meetings. The action items have their own dedicated page, which we found very useful. The insights page offers a condensed view, allowing for quick and easy access to multiple insights at a glance.</p>
5

Look and feel

5/10

<p>The design is clean and modern but simple, with a functional layout—nothing spectacular. Page load times are decent (2-3 seconds). There were occasional error pages, and the AI agents were temporarily down during testing, but since they were in BETA, it's understandable. Trying to open information on their website help pages sometimes annoyingly redirects you to the web app if you're signed in.</p>
Customisability
7

Customisability

7/10

<p>The automations page makes it easy to set up Circleback to gather specific insights from meetings, with triggers that can be customised, and send these notes to the chosen integration or group them under the same folder within Circleback. There is limited control over who automatically receives the meeting notes via email (either yourself or all participants). Custom templates are not available for meeting notes, and the transcriptions cannot be edited.</p>
8

Customisability

8/10

<p>For summary notes: You can customise your summary template and arrange sections in any order. You can also create your own summary types, eliminating the need to ask the AI assistant the same questions each time.</p><p><br></p><p>For custom agents: Customise the agent’s name, theme, and the questions it will ask during the interview.</p>
Ease of Setup
7

Ease of Setup

7/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls (card details required for trial). Template creation includes guided inputs via native workflow builder. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows via native builder take&nbsp;30-40 minutes.</p>
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Provides note templates and guided input boxes for creating custom ones. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows takes&nbsp;30-40 minutes&nbsp;due to a rich library of Zapier templates. Comes with some predefined agents for interviewing and setting up new agents takes 10-15 minutes.</p>
Customer Support
8

Customer Support

8/10

<p>Has a help center with a wide range of support articles. In addition to the help center and a releases page explaining how features work, Circleback offers AI-enabled self-serve support within the product—users can ask questions (e.g., "How do I add others to my team?") and receive near-instant answers based on their internal body of knowledge. Live support is also available via email and, during business hours, through live chat with a human agent.</p>
6

Customer Support

6/10

<p>An AI-powered chatbot with the option to message support. Typically, a real person replies within a few hours, but it can take up to 48 hours in some cases.</p>
Integratability
8

Integratability

8/10

<p>Integrates with a good range of popular software, including a native integration with Zapier. They also have support for webhooks&nbsp;in automations, allowing far more customization and the ability&nbsp;to use multiple&nbsp;webhook integrations via automations instead of just one at the account-level. This also enables team-wide integrations&nbsp;since automations can be shared across a whole team or organization.</p>
6

Integratability

6/10

<p>Supernormal offers useful integrations with a wide range of 3rd party tools e.g. Slack, Google Docs, Salesforce, Pipedrive. It has integrations with project management tools like ClickUp and Linear, lacks integrations with applicant tracking systems and doesn't have an API for custom integrations.</p>
Ease of Migration
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>Users can copy the transcript and download the meeting recording. Meetings can be shared via link or email, with teams created to manage access. The dedicated automation page simplifies sharing meeting notes through integrated apps and includes an option to set a webhook endpoint for receiving meeting data from Circleback. There is also support for providing link access automatically in the emails that are sent out either automatically or manually.</p>
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>You can easily download transcripts, meeting summaries, and share recordings.</p>
Loading...

Compare other AI Notetakers

Want to find out how Supernormal or Circleback stacks up with their competitors?