DocHub and Google Workspace serve distinctly different eSignature needs. DocHub is better suited for businesses requiring structured signing workflows and enhanced document security, with its superior signing order management and comprehensive security features. Google Workspace, on the other hand, excels for teams already in the Google ecosystem who prioritize ease of use and quick document creation over advanced eSignature capabilities. While DocHub offers more sophisticated eSignature features, it lacks the polished interface and broad integration capabilities of Google Workspace.
Search for anything...
DocHub vs Google Workspace - Comparison 2025
DocHub vs. Google Workspace
Last updated on
Reviewed by Paddy Stobbs
Stackfix Co-Founder & CEO
Advantages of DocHub
DocHub is significantly better at managing signing workflows than Google Workspace
DocHub offers more comprehensive document security features than Google Workspace
DocHub has more versatile field options than Google Workspace
Advantages of Google Workspace
Google Workspace is far superior at document creation than DocHub
Google Workspace has a much more intuitive interface than DocHub
Google Workspace offers better integration capabilities than DocHub
DocHub is best for
- Businesses with straightforward document signing workflows
- Who need quick document turnaround with flexible signing order options
- And/or who need basic security compliance with HIPAA and GDPR standards
Google Workspace is best for
- Businesses with basic eSignature needs who prioritize quick document creation and easy customization
- Businesses with straightforward document signing requirements
- Who need to quickly generate and customize documents from templates
- And/or who need basic document tracking without complex security requirements
DocHub is less good for
- Businesses with complex document workflows requiring formula fields, conditional logic, or custom field types
- Who need robust integrations with CRM, payment, or business automation platforms
- And/or who need advanced security features like ID verification or e-witnessing
Google Workspace is less good for
- Businesses with complex document workflows requiring advanced security and customization features
- Businesses with strict security and compliance requirements
- Who need advanced document field customization
- And/or who need automated workflow management
Gallery
DocHub
Google Workspace
Pricing, features & ratings
 DocHub Starting at $0Converted from GBP Billed monthly |  Google Workspace Starting at $20.10Converted from GBP user / month Billed monthly |
|---|
| Stackfix Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|
| Functionality | 4 <p>DocHub is a basic eSignature tool with limited features. It lacks web forms, payment collection, formula, custom, and conditional fields. It doesn’t auto-suggest or place fields, support signer delegation, or offer e-witnessing. There's no reporting dashboard, but the "Sent" page provides an overview of document statuses.</p> | 5 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool is simple and easy to use but comes with major functional limitations. It doesn’t support payment collection, signer delegation, or e-witnessing. Field options are very limited - no custom fields, conditional logic, formula fields, or dropdowns. There’s also no auto-suggestion for field placement, making setup fully manual. Security is basic, with only 2-Factor Authentication and no options for password protection, ID verification, or knowledge-based authentication.</p> |
| Ease of Use | 8 <p>For basic eSignature sharing and collection, DocHub offers a basic feature set, with its simplicity contributing to ease of use. It’s okay for core eSignature needs but lacks reporting, conditional / controlled input, and e-witness or signer delegation, which may limit certain agreements. Despite these gaps, it remains quite user-friendly.</p> | 9 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool is highly user-friendly, largely due to its limited functionality. The interface is clean and simple, with minimal distractions, making it easy to navigate for basic e-signature tasks. Without advanced features like complex workflows, reporting, or conditional fields, users can focus solely on preparing and sending documents for signature. Tracking status is straightforward, and the overall experience is smooth for anyone handling simple signing needs.</p> |
| Look and feel | 5 <p>DocHub has a clean but overly simple interface that could show more details on the dashboard and documents pages for quicker access to key information. The drag-and-drop builder feels slightly outdated, requiring users to open field options manually instead of using a persistent sidebar, making it less efficient.</p> | 9 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature feature offers a clean, minimal interface that makes basic signing tasks straightforward. Its stripped-down design keeps things simple and easy to navigate, especially for users focused purely on core e-signature needs. With no distractions from advanced features like complex workflows or detailed reporting, the experience remains focused and intuitive. The visual layout is basic but functional, making it accessible even for first-time users.</p> |
| Customisability | 4 <p>DocHub handles basic e-signatures but lacks key advanced customizability like e-witnessing and signer delegation, limiting signing flows. It also doesn’t support custom fields, formula fields, or conditional fields, reducing document customization. User permissions can't be customized either.</p> | 5 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool offers very limited customisability. There’s no support for signer delegation or e-witnessing, and no ability to create custom reports or user permissions. Field options are basic - no dropdowns, custom fields, conditional logic, or formulas. You're limited to standard input fields with minimal control over how documents are structured or how signers interact with them. This lack of flexibility makes it suitable only for the simplest signing needs.</p> |
| Ease of Setup | 9 <p>DocHub offers a free trial with self-serve purchasing for all tiers except enterprise. Onboarding is quick, allowing users to create eSignature documents in 5–10 minutes. Custom branding and integrations are easy to set up (since they are very limited), while configuring reusable templates might take an hour or two.</p> | 9 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool is quick to set up, especially for users already familiar with Google Docs. Creating and sending a basic document for signature takes just minutes. Due to the limited customization options, setup is simple - there are no complex templates, advanced permissions, or detailed roles to configure. Branding is minimal but easy to apply. Overall, the ease of setup reflects the tool’s simplicity, making it a fast start for basic e-signature needs.</p> |
| Customer Support | 5 <p>DocHub support allows users to submit requests via email (with replies typically within a few days) and offers a toll-free US support number. They have a well-organized Help Center, but users should search within it directly rather than using a search engine, as many SEO-driven pages inaccurately list features they don't offer.</p> | 6 <p>Microsoft’s customer support is solid for basic needs, especially with its wide range of self-help resources and responsive live chat. For business users with a support plan, service is generally reliable and timely. However, complex issues can take longer to resolve, and support quality can vary depending on the agent or region. Free-tier users may find the help more limited, but for most standard problems, the support experience is smooth and effective.</p> |
| Integratability | 1 <p>Integrations are severely limited, with only Google Drive and Dropbox supported. It doesn’t integrate with platforms like Salesforce or Slack, and there’s no Zapier or API access, making custom integrations nearly impossible.</p> | 6 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool integrates seamlessly with Google Docs and Google Drive, since it functions as a built-in add-on. This makes it easy to prepare, send, and manage documents directly within the Google ecosystem. However, a major drawback is the lack of an API - despite being one of the most requested features, there’s currently no way to connect the eSignature tool to external systems or automate workflows, limiting its use in more advanced or integrated setups.</p> |
| Ease of Migration | 2 <p>DocHub offers minimal data export options, partly due to no Zapier or API access. Finished documents and audit trails can be exported as PDFs, and another major drawback is the lack of downloadable reports for tracking insights across multiple documents.</p> | 2 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool offers basic export options. Signed documents are automatically saved to Google Drive and can be downloaded as PDFs, making it easy to store or share completed files. However, there are no advanced export features - no bulk export, no custom file naming, and no metadata export. You also can’t export reports or audit trails separately. While it covers the essentials, exportability is limited and not suited for high-volume or compliance-heavy workflows.</p> |
Loading...
Compare other eSignature Tools
Want to find out how DocHub or Google Workspace stacks up with their competitors?