| Functionality | 4 <p>DocHub is a basic eSignature tool with limited features. It lacks web forms, payment collection, formula, custom, and conditional fields. It doesn’t auto-suggest or place fields, support signer delegation, or offer e-witnessing. There's no reporting dashboard, but the "Sent" page provides an overview of document statuses.</p> | 6 <p>Signeasy provides a very easy-to-use eSignature solution but that comes with major limitations in some regular, and many advanced, eSignature features. It doesn’t support payment collection, signer delegation, or e-witnessing. A massive drawback is field customizability—no custom fields, formula fields, conditional fields, or dropdowns. It also lacks auto-suggestion for field placement and auto-fill from integrations, making document setup more manual. Security is weak—no password protection, ID verification, or knowledge-based authentication, only 2-Factor Authentication.</p> |
| Ease of Use | 8 <p>For basic eSignature sharing and collection, DocHub offers a basic feature set, with its simplicity contributing to ease of use. It’s okay for core eSignature needs but lacks reporting, conditional / controlled input, and e-witness or signer delegation, which may limit certain agreements. Despite these gaps, it remains quite user-friendly.</p> | 10 <p>For basic e-signature sharing and collecting, Signeasy maintains a good range of features and its limited functionality contributes to its ease of use rating. If you're focused on core e-signature needs and don't require advanced reporting or complex workflows, the pie chart report view works great for tracking document statuses. The lack of payment collection, and other advanced features keeps the focus on e-signatures, making it exceptionally user-friendly.</p> |
| Look and feel | 5 <p>DocHub has a clean but overly simple interface that could show more details on the dashboard and documents pages for quicker access to key information. The drag-and-drop builder feels slightly outdated, requiring users to open field options manually instead of using a persistent sidebar, making it less efficient.</p> | 8 <p>Signeasy keeps things simple, and that's its strength. The interface is clean and modern, with everything right where you'd expect to find it. The drag-and-drop builder is easy to use, and while you won't get fancy reporting features, their simple pie chart is perfect for tracking document status at a glance.</p> |
| Customisability | 4 <p>DocHub handles basic e-signatures but lacks key advanced customizability like e-witnessing and signer delegation, limiting signing flows. It also doesn’t support custom fields, formula fields, or conditional fields, reducing document customization. User permissions can't be customized either.</p> | 5 <p>Signeasy handles basic e-signatures but lacks key advanced features. No e-witnessing and signer delegation means some signing flows aren’t covered. A major drawback is the absence of custom reports, forcing API reliance for insights. It also lacks custom user permissions. Field options are heavily limited—no dropdowns, custom fields, formula fields, or conditional objects. You're mostly restricted to placing basic input fields without real control over form customization, making it far less flexible than other solutions.</p> |
| Ease of Setup | 9 <p>DocHub offers a free trial with self-serve purchasing for all tiers except enterprise. Onboarding is quick, allowing users to create eSignature documents in 5–10 minutes. Custom branding and integrations are easy to set up (since they are very limited), while configuring reusable templates might take an hour or two.</p> | 10 <p>Signeasy offers a simple onboarding process with a free trial and self-serve purchasing for all tiers except custom plans. Users can create their first eSignature document within minutes, and setting up templates, security settings, and signer roles takes a couple of hours at most due to the limited customizability. You can't set custom permissions for team members, and branding is straightforward to configure. Integration options are very limited - with no Zapier support, connecting to other platforms requires API development.</p> |
| Customer Support | 5 <p>DocHub support allows users to submit requests via email (with replies typically within a few days) and offers a toll-free US support number. They have a well-organized Help Center, but users should search within it directly rather than using a search engine, as many SEO-driven pages inaccurately list features they don't offer.</p> | 5 <p>Signeasy offers customer support via their Help Center, which includes self-help articles and video tutorials. Their support team is available from 1 PM - 10 PM GMT / 8 AM - 5 PM ET, with response times typically under 24 hours. There is a live chat bot for assistance, but no direct phone support for general inquiries.</p> |
| Integratability | 1 <p>Integrations are severely limited, with only Google Drive and Dropbox supported. It doesn’t integrate with platforms like Salesforce or Slack, and there’s no Zapier or API access, making custom integrations nearly impossible.</p> | 2 <p>Integrations are severely limited, although it integrates with HubSpot and Google Drive natively. It doesn’t integrate with most platforms like Salesforce or Slack, and there’s no Zapier. Most connections require their API, so if you’re not familiar with coding, options are minimal.</p> |
| Ease of Migration | 2 <p>DocHub offers minimal data export options, partly due to no Zapier or API access. Finished documents and audit trails can be exported as PDFs, and another major drawback is the lack of downloadable reports for tracking insights across multiple documents.</p> | 4 <p>Signeasy offers minimal data export options. Finished documents can be downloaded as PDFs, with options for document-only, audit trail-only, or both. Reports can be downloaded for custom dates but only show basic stats—sent, completed, declined, voided, self-signed, signature requests received, and expired (per team member). With no native integrations except HubSpot, data syncing is limited, requiring API exports for customization and automation.</p> |
