logo
Search for anything...
About

Fathom vs Read AI - Comparison 2025

Fathom vs. Read AI

Last updated on

Reviewed by Camin McCluskey

Stackfix Co-Founder & CTO

CM

Fathom and Read AI serve distinct needs in the AI notetaker space. Fathom excels at rapid, accurate meeting documentation with powerful AI assistance and transcript editing capabilities, making it ideal for teams prioritizing quick access to meeting content and maintaining accurate records.

Read AI, on the other hand, stands out with its sophisticated engagement analytics and cross-meeting insights, better serving teams focused on improving meeting effectiveness and communication patterns. While both tools handle basic meeting documentation well, their strengths make them suitable for different use cases: Fathom for efficient meeting documentation and follow-up, Read AI for meeting analytics and team performance improvement.

Fathom Product Logo

Advantages of Fathom

Fathom is significantly better at AI-powered assistance

We found Fathom's AI assistant to be remarkably accurate, while Read AI lacks this functionality entirely. This matters for teams who need quick answers about past meetings or want to generate custom follow-up emails based on meeting content.

Fathom offers superior transcript editing capabilities
Unlike Read AI which only allows basic text edits, Fathom provides comprehensive transcript editing including speaker reassignment and bulk section removal. This is crucial for teams needing accurate meeting records, especially when speaker detection isn't perfect.
Fathom provides unlimited storage in free tier
Fathom offers unlimited storage and recording time per meeting, whereas Read AI caps storage at 300 minutes and limits recordings to 60 minutes per meeting. This makes Fathom more suitable for teams with frequent or longer meetings.
Fathom generates meeting notes much faster
While Read AI takes 5-30 minutes to generate meeting notes, Fathom produces them in seconds. This speed difference is significant for teams needing quick access to meeting summaries for immediate follow-up actions.
Read AI Product Logo

Advantages of Read AI

Read AI offers superior cross-meeting insights
Unlike Fathom, Read AI can aggregate conversations across multiple platforms into 'Readouts' with summaries and key takeaways, plus provides smart recommendations about meeting attendance based on historical participation. This is especially useful for teams looking to optimize their meeting culture and attendance.
Read AI is significantly better at tracking engagement metrics
Read AI provides detailed engagement analytics, including attention levels, sentiment analysis, and bias detection, offering more comprehensive insights than Fathom's basic talk time and monologue tracking. This is particularly valuable for teams focused on improving meeting effectiveness and communication dynamics.
Read AI has better mobile capabilities
Read AI supports recording in-person meetings via a mobile app, while Fathom does not offer this functionality. This makes Read AI more versatile for teams that need to capture both virtual and in-person meetings.

Fathom is best for

  • Businesses with high meeting volume (20-50 meetings per week) who need comprehensive meeting analysis
  • Who need advanced transcript editing capabilities and detailed speaker identification
  • And/or who want real-time coaching features and keyword alerts during meetings

Read AI is best for

  • Businesses with high meeting volume (20-50 meetings per week) who need comprehensive engagement analytics
  • Who need detailed performance metrics and want to improve team communication effectiveness
  • And/or who want cross-meeting insights and automated recommendations for meeting optimization

Fathom is less good for

  • Businesses with a low meeting volume (5-10 meetings per week)
  • Who need simple transcription without extensive editing capabilities and real-time coaching features
  • And/or who want a streamlined interface without extensive tooltips and feedback prompts

Read AI is less good for

  • Businesses with a low meeting volume (5-10 meetings per week)
  • Who need highly customizable meeting templates and AI-generated insights
  • And/or who want a simple, streamlined interface without extensive engagement metrics

Gallery

Fathom logoFathom
Fathom screenshot
Read AI logoRead AI
Read AI screenshot

Pricing, features & ratings

Fathom logo

Fathom

Starting at

$0

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Read AI logo

Read AI

Starting at

$0

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
9

Functionality

9/10

<p>Fathom is one of the most feature-rich AI notetakers we’ve reviewed—it took a while to test everything.</p><p><br></p><p>It’s clear why there’s a “Give Feedback” option in so many places throughout the app: if you’re trying to accomplish something, there’s a good chance Fathom has either already built it or optimised it for quick use.</p>
7

Functionality

7/10

<p>Read’s functionality focuses on speech analysis, offering tools to evaluate engagement and the impact of speech on others. It provides great summaries across multiple conversations to keep you informed. However, it lacks options to customise AI insights or edit key moments in meetings, and there is no AI assistant to answer questions or expand on specific insights.</p>
Ease of Use
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Although Fathom offers a ton of features, it does an excellent job of onboarding users with demo and explanation videos. There isn’t a mountain of settings to configure and learn before getting started—everything is either well-explained or easy to understand.</p>
5

Ease of Use

5/10

<p>Read has a high learning curve, largely due to its extensive speech analysis tools and unique suggestions, such as recommending meeting skips or removing low-contributing participants. It can take time to get used to the navigation, particularly if you prefer simpler, more condensed summaries.</p>
Look and feel
4

Look and feel

4/10

<p>Fathom’s extensive feature set comes at a cost—everywhere you move your mouse, a tooltip appears, or there’s an option to click something. This can get overwhelming when you’re just trying to accomplish simple tasks.</p><p>During setup and early use, they heavily promote their “Point” system (feedback in exchange for points) and frequently send feedback emails and questions, which can become a bit intrusive.</p>
4

Look and feel

4/10

<p>Read's interface is modern but somewhat overloaded with features, similar to Fathom. Information is duplicated in the report, such as action items appearing in both the notes on the left and the highlights on the right. During testing, we found ourselves frequently scrolling between sections, whereas other AI notetakers use better design and spacing to present information more clearly.</p>
Customisability
8

Customisability

8/10

<p>Fathom provides control over many aspects of the transcript, summary notes, speaker tags, and highlighting. If other AI notetakers often mis-transcribe or misidentify speakers without allowing edits, Fathom could be the solution for you.</p>
3

Customisability

3/10

<p>Read offers many AI insights, but customisation options are limited. You can't modify the template for summaries, action items, or key questions, and the trailer/highlights generated for meeting recordings can't be customised. Even the tags on reports are limited to a selection of auto-generated options.</p>
Ease of Setup
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Provides 15 note templates, customizable but without guided input creation. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows require Zapier but lack a rich library of Zapier templates, taking&nbsp;1-2 hours.</p>
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. Provides AI insights but no custom note templates. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. Advanced workflows require Zapier but lack a rich library of Zapier templates, taking&nbsp;1-2 hours.</p>
Customer Support
8

Customer Support

8/10

<p>They offer an FAQ help centre and the option to send messages directly on their website. We received responses within a few minutes at best, and within a couple of hours at worst, though replies can take up to 24 hours. They answered our questions thoroughly and provided additional details for reassurance.</p>
5

Customer Support

5/10

<p>A contact form is available on their page, along with a searchable FAQ section. Usual replies are within 24 hours.</p>
Integratability
4

Integratability

4/10

<p>Fathom doesn’t integrate with many other software platforms, but it covers the main ones.</p>
8

Integratability

8/10

<p>Integrates with a wide range of popular tools like Google Calendar, Slack, and Zoom, though some advanced integrations (Jira, HubSpot etc.) require premium plans.</p>
Ease of Migration
9

Ease of Migration

9/10

<p>Fathom allows you to share a meeting recording via a link and control access, including the ability to revoke an attendee's access to play the recording after sharing. You can download the video recordings too.</p><p>The “Copy Follow-up Email” button is very handy after short meetings.</p><p>For the action items, it offers specific “Copy for…” options for Asana, Google Docs, Gmail, Todoist, and Microsoft Word, ensuring links and formatting are optimized for each platform. This feature is also available for summaries, with options for Google Docs, Gmail, Notion, and Microsoft Word.</p>
9

Ease of Migration

9/10

<p>Read AI offers various options to share meeting recordings and notes, including downloading the summary or transcript (both in .txt), the full video, or auto-generated trailer/highlights (all in .mp4). It also provides quick share buttons for integrations like Notion, Slack, and more. Meeting reports can be shared via link or email, with access control options.</p>
Loading...

Compare other AI Notetakers

Want to find out how Fathom or Read AI stacks up with their competitors?