Google Workspace vs Adobe Acrobat - Comparison 2025

Stackfix review Visit Website

Google Workspace vs. Adobe Acrobat

Last updated on

Reviewed by Paddy Stobbs

Stackfix Co-Founder & CEO

Adobe Acrobat and Google Workspace represent opposite ends of the e-signature spectrum. Adobe Acrobat is better suited to businesses requiring advanced document handling capabilities, with its superior field customization, payment collection, and auto-field detection making it ideal for complex workflows and high-volume processing. Meanwhile, Google Workspace is the better choice for small teams or individuals prioritizing simplicity and quick setup, offering an intuitive interface and AI-powered document creation, though lacking in advanced features. The choice between them largely depends on whether you need comprehensive functionality or prefer streamlined simplicity.

Advantages of Google Workspace

Google Workspace is significantly easier to use than Adobe Acrobat

With an exceptionally clean and simple interface, Google Workspace makes basic e-signature tasks more straightforward than Adobe Acrobat. Its stripped-down design is particularly beneficial for teams needing quick, uncomplicated document signing without the learning curve of Adobe Acrobat's more complex features.

Google Workspace offers superior document creation capabilities compared to Adobe Acrobat

Unlike Adobe Acrobat, Google Workspace provides 20+ templates broken down by category and includes AI-powered document creation through Gemini. This makes it significantly faster to create common documents like recommendation letters or job offers, especially valuable for HR teams or anyone frequently creating standardized documents.

Google Workspace is much quicker to set up than Adobe Acrobat

Google Workspace enables us to start creating and sending documents for signature within minutes. This makes it particularly suitable for small teams or individuals who need to get started quickly without extensive configuration.

Advantages of Adobe Acrobat

Adobe Acrobat is significantly more powerful at auto-detecting and placing fields than Google Workspace

While Google Workspace lacks auto-field detection entirely, Adobe Acrobat excels with consistently accurate field placement that maximizes available space. This is particularly valuable for teams processing high volumes of documents, as it dramatically reduces document preparation time and ensures professional formatting.

Adobe Acrobat offers substantially more field customization options than Google Workspace

Unlike Google Workspace's basic field options, Adobe Acrobat provides a comprehensive suite of field types including dropdowns, checkboxes, radio buttons, and formula fields. This makes it better suited for complex documents requiring sophisticated data collection, particularly useful for legal or financial documents requiring multiple input types.

Adobe Acrobat enables payment collection during signing while Google Workspace does not

Adobe Acrobat integrates with Braintree for payment collection during document signing, a feature entirely absent from Google Workspace. This makes Adobe Acrobat more suitable for businesses needing to collect payments alongside signatures, such as service agreements or purchase contracts.

Google Workspace is best for

Businesses with basic eSignature needs who prioritize quick document creation and easy customization
Businesses with straightforward document signing requirements
Who need to quickly generate and customize documents from templates
And/or who need basic document tracking without complex security requirements

Adobe Acrobat is best for

Businesses with straightforward document signing needs
Who need highly accurate automatic field detection and placement
And/or who need basic document security with audit trails but not advanced verification

Google Workspace is less good for

Businesses with complex document workflows requiring advanced security and customization features
Businesses with strict security and compliance requirements
Who need advanced document field customization
And/or who need automated workflow management

Adobe Acrobat is less good for

Businesses with complex document workflows requiring multiple integrations
Who need advanced reporting and analytics on document performance
And/or who need to edit and reissue documents after sending

Gallery

Google Workspace

Adobe Acrobat

Pricing, features & ratings

	Google Workspace Starting at $20.21 Converted from GBP user / month Billed monthly Pricing calculator Visit Website	Adobe Acrobat Pricing calculator Visit Website

Stackfix Verdict
Functionality	5 Functionality 5/10 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool is simple and easy to use but comes with major functional limitations. It doesn’t support payment collection, signer delegation, or e-witnessing. Field options are very limited - no custom fields, conditional logic, formula fields, or dropdowns. There’s also no auto-suggestion for field placement, making setup fully manual. Security is basic, with only 2-Factor Authentication and no options for password protection, ID verification, or knowledge-based authentication.</p>	7 Functionality 7/10 <p>Adobe Acrobat is a good eSignature solution with amazing auto-field detection. It supports web forms, payment collection (via Braintree), and has a mobile app. However, it's not great for large-scale sending, as it lacks bulk send and auto-fill features. There's no witness or in-person signing, and reports are almost non-existent, offering minimal insights beyond document status. Security includes password protection and audit trails, but no ID verification or KBA.</p>
Ease of Use	9 Ease of Use 9/10 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool is highly user-friendly, largely due to its limited functionality. The interface is clean and simple, with minimal distractions, making it easy to navigate for basic e-signature tasks. Without advanced features like complex workflows, reporting, or conditional fields, users can focus solely on preparing and sending documents for signature. Tracking status is straightforward, and the overall experience is smooth for anyone handling simple signing needs.</p>	6 Ease of Use 6/10 <p>The platform is easy to use, though advanced document preparation takes some learning. Its clean, modern design and excellent field auto-placement speed up document creation. However, it lacks bulk sending and auto-fill from integrations, limiting workflow efficiency. A file upload field eliminates the need for separate document requests, and payment collection is available via Adobe Acrobat. However, documents cannot be edited and resent without voiding, making corrections less seamless.</p>
Look and feel	9 Look and feel 9/10 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature feature offers a clean, minimal interface that makes basic signing tasks straightforward. Its stripped-down design keeps things simple and easy to navigate, especially for users focused purely on core e-signature needs. With no distractions from advanced features like complex workflows or detailed reporting, the experience remains focused and intuitive. The visual layout is basic but functional, making it accessible even for first-time users.</p>	6 Look and feel 6/10 <p>Although Adobe Acrobat has a solid set of features, the interface is simple, modern, and has a nice theme. Navigation is straightforward, but it’s more of a file management platform than a typical layout for managing eSignature documents and tracking them. The drag-and-drop builder is easy to use. </p>
Customisability	5 Customisability 5/10 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool offers very limited customisability. There’s no support for signer delegation or e-witnessing, and no ability to create custom reports or user permissions. Field options are basic - no dropdowns, custom fields, conditional logic, or formulas. You're limited to standard input fields with minimal control over how documents are structured or how signers interact with them. This lack of flexibility makes it suitable only for the simplest signing needs.</p>	4 Customisability 4/10 <p>Adobe Acrobat handles basic e-signatures but lacks advanced customizability like e-witnessing and in-person signing, limiting signing flows. User roles cannot be customized, and with no Zapier or API access, creating custom workflows isn't possible.</p>
Ease of Setup	9 Ease of Setup 9/10 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool is quick to set up, especially for users already familiar with Google Docs. Creating and sending a basic document for signature takes just minutes. Due to the limited customization options, setup is simple - there are no complex templates, advanced permissions, or detailed roles to configure. Branding is minimal but easy to apply. Overall, the ease of setup reflects the tool’s simplicity, making it a fast start for basic e-signature needs.</p>	8 Ease of Setup 8/10 <p>Adobe Acrobat offers a free trial with self-serve purchasing for all tiers except Acrobat Sign Solutions, a separate product with extended eSignature features. Onboarding is simple, allowing users to create eSignature documents in 5–10 minutes. Custom branding is easy to set up, and other integrations are quick to configure, but there's no Zapier or API access. Setting up reusable templates, security settings, and signer roles may take a few hours.</p>
Customer Support	6 Customer Support 6/10 <p>Microsoft’s customer support is solid for basic needs, especially with its wide range of self-help resources and responsive live chat. For business users with a support plan, service is generally reliable and timely. However, complex issues can take longer to resolve, and support quality can vary depending on the agent or region. Free-tier users may find the help more limited, but for most standard problems, the support experience is smooth and effective.</p>	7 Customer Support 7/10 <p>Personalized Q&A is available via phone, live chat, and request submission. Higher-tier plans get 24/7 support. Self-serve support includes a comprehensive Help Center and community forums with high-quality guides and tutorials.</p>
Integratability	6 Integratability 6/10 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool integrates seamlessly with Google Docs and Google Drive, since it functions as a built-in add-on. This makes it easy to prepare, send, and manage documents directly within the Google ecosystem. However, a major drawback is the lack of an API - despite being one of the most requested features, there’s currently no way to connect the eSignature tool to external systems or automate workflows, limiting its use in more advanced or integrated setups.</p>	1 Integratability 1/10 <p>Integrations are severely limited, with only Google Drive and Dropbox supported. It doesn’t integrate with platforms like Salesforce or Slack, and there’s no Zapier or API access, making custom integrations nearly impossible.</p>
Ease of Migration	2 Ease of Migration 2/10 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool offers basic export options. Signed documents are automatically saved to Google Drive and can be downloaded as PDFs, making it easy to store or share completed files. However, there are no advanced export features - no bulk export, no custom file naming, and no metadata export. You also can’t export reports or audit trails separately. While it covers the essentials, exportability is limited and not suited for high-volume or compliance-heavy workflows.</p>	2 Ease of Migration 2/10 <p>Adobe Acrobat offers minimal data export options, partly due to no Zapier or API access. Finished documents and audit trails can be exported as PDFs, and another major drawback is the lack of downloadable reports for tracking insights across multiple documents.</p>