Search for anything...
Google Workspace vs ShareFile - Comparison 2025
Google Workspace vs. ShareFile
Last updated on
Reviewed by Paddy Stobbs
Stackfix Co-Founder & CEO
Advantages of Google Workspace
Google Workspace is significantly easier to set up than ShareFile
Google Workspace delivers a far superior user interface compared to ShareFile
Google Workspace offers superior ease of use compared to ShareFile
Advantages of ShareFile
ShareFile offers superior integration capabilities compared to Google Workspace
ShareFile provides superior role-based access controls compared to Google Workspace
Google Workspace is best for
- Businesses with basic eSignature needs who prioritize quick document creation and easy customization
- Businesses with straightforward document signing requirements
- Who need to quickly generate and customize documents from templates
- And/or who need basic document tracking without complex security requirements
ShareFile is best for
- Businesses with straightforward document signing requirements and strong team management needs
- Who need granular control over user permissions and document access
- And/or who need native integration with accounting and enterprise platforms like Salesforce
Google Workspace is less good for
- Businesses with complex document workflows requiring advanced security and customization features
- Businesses with strict security and compliance requirements
- Who need advanced document field customization
- And/or who need automated workflow management
ShareFile is less good for
- Businesses with complex document workflows requiring conditional logic and formula calculations
- Who need detailed analytics and reporting capabilities
- And/or who need advanced ID verification methods beyond basic authentication
Gallery
Google Workspace
ShareFile
Pricing, features & ratings
 Google Workspace Starting at $19.87Converted from GBP user / month Billed monthly |  ShareFile Starting at $17.60user / month Billed monthly |
|---|
| Stackfix Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|
| Functionality | 5 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool is simple and easy to use but comes with major functional limitations. It doesn’t support payment collection, signer delegation, or e-witnessing. Field options are very limited - no custom fields, conditional logic, formula fields, or dropdowns. There’s also no auto-suggestion for field placement, making setup fully manual. Security is basic, with only 2-Factor Authentication and no options for password protection, ID verification, or knowledge-based authentication.</p> | 4 <p>ShareFile is a basic eSignature solution with limited advanced features. It lacks web forms, a mobile app, and payment collection. There are no formula or conditional fields, and it doesn’t auto-suggest or place fields. It also lacks signer delegation and e-witnessing, restricting some workflows. The reports dashboard tracks document status but offers little beyond that.</p> |
| Ease of Use | 9 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool is highly user-friendly, largely due to its limited functionality. The interface is clean and simple, with minimal distractions, making it easy to navigate for basic e-signature tasks. Without advanced features like complex workflows, reporting, or conditional fields, users can focus solely on preparing and sending documents for signature. Tracking status is straightforward, and the overall experience is smooth for anyone handling simple signing needs.</p> | 6 <p>The platform is generally easy to use, though advanced document preparation requires some learning. The UI can be confusing at times, and we found that we had to check the help center a few times to find some options. It lacks auto-suggest and field placement, limiting workflow efficiency. However, documents can be edited and resent without voiding, making corrections easier.</p> |
| Look and feel | 9 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature feature offers a clean, minimal interface that makes basic signing tasks straightforward. Its stripped-down design keeps things simple and easy to navigate, especially for users focused purely on core e-signature needs. With no distractions from advanced features like complex workflows or detailed reporting, the experience remains focused and intuitive. The visual layout is basic but functional, making it accessible even for first-time users.</p> | 4 <p>The UI is plain and lacks a strong visual theme. It feels unpolished and confusing, with no dedicated global reports page—reports are only accessible through folders. Small UI bugs are present, and page load times are often slow. Logging requires entering the company subdomain as well as login details, adding unnecessary friction. The signature requests overview is too basic and could provide more detail for a quick view.</p> |
| Customisability | 5 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool offers very limited customisability. There’s no support for signer delegation or e-witnessing, and no ability to create custom reports or user permissions. Field options are basic - no dropdowns, custom fields, conditional logic, or formulas. You're limited to standard input fields with minimal control over how documents are structured or how signers interact with them. This lack of flexibility makes it suitable only for the simplest signing needs.</p> | 6 <p>ShareFile typically handles capturing e-signatures well, but it's missing key advanced functionalities, including e-witnessing, signer delegation, and in-person signing, meaning not all signing flows are covered. The absence of custom reports is a significant drawback, making it difficult to get detailed insights without API reliance. While the platform is simple overall, it's got good control over user permissions and branding options.</p> |
| Ease of Setup | 9 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool is quick to set up, especially for users already familiar with Google Docs. Creating and sending a basic document for signature takes just minutes. Due to the limited customization options, setup is simple - there are no complex templates, advanced permissions, or detailed roles to configure. Branding is minimal but easy to apply. Overall, the ease of setup reflects the tool’s simplicity, making it a fast start for basic e-signature needs.</p> | 5 <p>ShareFile offers a free trial, with self-serve purchasing for all tiers except custom plans. The onboarding process is simple, allowing users to create eSignature documents within 5–10 minutes. It integrates directly with many platforms, though HubSpot and Slack require Zapier. Custom branding is easy to configure. Setting up reusable templates, security settings, and user roles takes a few hours, while enterprise-level setup may take around a week.</p> |
| Customer Support | 6 <p>Microsoft’s customer support is solid for basic needs, especially with its wide range of self-help resources and responsive live chat. For business users with a support plan, service is generally reliable and timely. However, complex issues can take longer to resolve, and support quality can vary depending on the agent or region. Free-tier users may find the help more limited, but for most standard problems, the support experience is smooth and effective.</p> | 5 <p>There is a Help Center with a good range of articles and guides. Email support is available via request submission, as well as live chat and phone support. Response times for email support are typically within one business day.</p> |
| Integratability | 6 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool integrates seamlessly with Google Docs and Google Drive, since it functions as a built-in add-on. This makes it easy to prepare, send, and manage documents directly within the Google ecosystem. However, a major drawback is the lack of an API - despite being one of the most requested features, there’s currently no way to connect the eSignature tool to external systems or automate workflows, limiting its use in more advanced or integrated setups.</p> | 8 <p>ShareFile natively integrates with platforms like Salesforce, Pipedrive, and Google Drive. HubSpot and PayPal require Zapier, which also connects to thousands of other apps. An API is available for custom integrations and automation.</p> |
| Ease of Migration | 2 <p>Google Workspace’s eSignature tool offers basic export options. Signed documents are automatically saved to Google Drive and can be downloaded as PDFs, making it easy to store or share completed files. However, there are no advanced export features - no bulk export, no custom file naming, and no metadata export. You also can’t export reports or audit trails separately. While it covers the essentials, exportability is limited and not suited for high-volume or compliance-heavy workflows.</p> | 7 <p>ShareFile provides multiple export options for completed documents, including PDFs with an optional audit trail. However, there are no quick-access buttons for sharing while viewing a document. Native CRM integrations allow seamless data syncing, with API options for further customization.</p> |
Loading...
Compare other eSignature Tools
Want to find out how Google Workspace or ShareFile stacks up with their competitors?