| Functionality | 4 <p>Hunter lacks many core features you'd hope to see from a lead generation platform. When it comes to prospect search, the first hurdle you'll face is the relatively small size of its database - this is due to the fact that they only source emails from public websites and do not cross-reference with any additional data sources. Additionally, many common prospecting filters were missing such as company revenue, contact job title and contact tenure. Finally, adjacent features around email engagement were also light on features meaning you'd likely need to pay separately for a dedicated outbound engagement platform.</p> | 3 <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">LeadIQ's functionality is narrow. When it comes to prospect search, the first hurdle you'll face is the relatively small size of its database compared to some competitors. Additionally, adjacent features around email engagement are omitted entirely meaning that you will need to pay for dedicated outbound tools separately. However, LeadIQ does provide an email/message personalization AI feature which integrates nicely with many outbound platforms. </span></p> |
| Ease of Use | 6 <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Hunter's relatively limited feature set means that its web app is intuitive and easy to navigate. Additionally, its onboarding was simple and not overwhelming. However, one drawback is that its contact prospecting interface is non-standard amongst competitors making it harder to pick up. Overall, it would take an average SMB employee a few hours to master its use.</span></p> | 5 <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">LeadIQ's limited feature set means that its web app is relatively easy to navigate. Its prospecting interface is familiar when compared to competitors, however, some interfaces are clunky and cramped and often require a second look to find the data point/button you're hunting for. Overall, it would take an average SMB employee a few hours to master its use.</span></p> |
| Look and feel | 7 <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Hunter's web app is simple and easy to navigate. It's design aesthetic is minimalist and clean, something which is rare amongst tooling in the space. Additionally, when tested, we find it's search pages were generally fast to load. </span></p> | 2 <p>LeadIQ's UI feels dated. When tested, we find many pages to be overwhelming and confusingly laid out which made navigation difficult at times despite the overall lack of functionality. Additionally, search pages were often slow to load (occasionally taking >5 seconds to load).</p> |
| Customisability | 4 <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">While Hunter offers the ability to create custom lists, it lacks some customisability facets that larger businesses may find helpful. These include the ability to share custom searches with colleagues or to manage and assign territories to specific sales agents.</span></p> | 6 <p>LeadIQ offers a handful of avenues for customisation that would be help to both SMBs and larger enterprises. For example you're able to map additional custom fields when adding contacts to external CRMs/engagement platforms and you're able to manage/assign territories for individual sales agents.</p> |
| Ease of Setup | 9 <p>Hunter offers a simple, self-serve free trial for their platform. When tested, we found the initial setup to be simple (taking <5 mins). Additionally, connecting email addresses to their outbound feature was relatively trivial too - with a one click connect feature for popular providers like Google and Outlook.</p> | 7 <p>LeadIQ offers a simple, self-serve free trial for their platform. When tested, we found the initial setup to be very simple (taking <5 mins). Additionally, the lack of native email sequencing functionality means it doesn't take long to get the most out of the platform either. The only areas which do take some time to configure are buried in settings - such as the ability to <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">manage/assign territories for individual sales agents.</span></p> |
| Customer Support | 7 <p>You can contact a support agent via a live chat widget inside Hunter's web app. When tested, we find agents to be helpful and about to troubleshoot technical questions often in the first response.</p><p>Additionally, Hunter provides a detailed help centre which was able to answer almost all basic question we had in testing.</p> | 3 <p>You can contact a support agent via a live chat widget inside LeadIQ's web app. When tested, we found the default chat bot to be unhelpful and often linking to irrelevant help centre articles. Additionally, when tested, it took over 24 hours to contact a real agent to answer our queries.</p><p>However, LeadIQ does provide a detailed help centre which was able to answer almost all basic questions we had in testing.</p> |
| Integratability | 4 <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Hunter provides a number of integrations with popular CRMs (Salesforce, Hubspot), email clients (Gmail, Outlook) and automation platforms like Zapier. Additionally, it offers an API through which users can interact with Hunter's database directly. However, we would like to see native integrations with sales engagement platforms such as Outreach and Salesloft. </span></p> | 4 <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">LeadIQ provides a number of integrations with popular CRMs (Salesforce, Hubspot), email clients (Gmail) and engagement platforms (Outreach, Salesloft). However, we would like to see an API offered (as most competitors do today).</span></p> |
| Ease of Migration | 7 <p>Hunter offers self-serve export functionality within its web app.</p><p>Additionally, Hunter offers a well-documented API through which businesses are able to interact with their database directly.</p> | 4 <p>LeadIQ offers self-serve export functionality within its web app.</p><p>However, we would like to have seen an API on offer (as many competitors do currently) for direct querying and interaction with the LeadIQ database.</p> |
