logo
Search for anything...
About

Jamie vs Otter.ai - Comparison 2025

Jamie vs. Otter.ai

Last updated on

Reviewed by Camin McCluskey

Stackfix Co-Founder & CTO

CM

In our comprehensive testing, Otter.ai emerges as the more polished and feature-rich AI notetaker, particularly excelling in AI chat functionality, integration capabilities, and export options. It's better suited for enterprise teams requiring robust integration with business tools and comprehensive meeting documentation.

Jamie, while offering unique advantages in discreet recording and cross-meeting insights, falls short in core functionality, user experience, and integration capabilities. Its significantly slower processing times and limited export options make it less suitable for teams requiring efficient, seamless meeting documentation workflows.

Jamie Product Logo

Advantages of Jamie

Jamie is significantly more discreet in recording meetings
Jamie allows users to record meetings without showing a bot, while Otter.ai requires a visible bot participant. This is particularly valuable for teams conducting sensitive meetings or those who prefer minimal disruption to their meeting dynamics.
Otter.ai Product Logo

Advantages of Otter.ai

Otter.ai is significantly better at AI chat functionality
We found Otter.ai's AI chat feature to be surprisingly effective, providing comprehensive and nuanced answers based on meeting content while clearly citing its sources. In contrast, Jamie's AI assistant is painfully slow and often struggles to utilize context from multiple meetings effectively.
Otter.ai has better export functionality
We find Otter.ai to be highly exportable, allowing users to download transcripts, meeting summaries, and audio in various formats, including timestamps and speaker names. In contrast, Jamie only offers basic transcript copying to clipboard, severely limiting its utility for teams needing to share or archive meeting content.
Otter.ai offers superior integration capabilities
While not perfect, Otter.ai provides integration with key platforms like Slack, Google Docs, Salesforce, and HubSpot, making it more versatile for enterprise users. Jamie, on the other hand, only offers basic calendar integration with no support for popular business tools.

Jamie is best for

  • Businesses with a low meeting volume (5-10 meetings per week) who need basic transcription and note-taking
  • Who need basic AI-generated meeting summaries and don't require advanced customization or integrations
  • And/or who want to analyze themes across multiple meetings despite basic accuracy

Otter.ai is best for

  • Businesses with a low meeting volume (5-10 meetings per week) who need basic transcription and note-taking
  • Who need straightforward meeting summaries and action items without advanced customization
  • And/or who want basic integrations with common tools like Slack, Google Docs, and Salesforce

Jamie is less good for

  • Businesses with moderate to high meeting volume (10+ meetings per week)
  • Who need sophisticated meeting note customization and template management
  • And/or who need robust integrations with other business tools like Slack, Asana, or Notion

Otter.ai is less good for

  • Businesses with high meeting volume (20-50 meetings per week)
  • Who need highly accurate transcriptions for meetings with technical jargon or accented speakers
  • And/or who need advanced customization features like custom templates and editable meeting summaries

Gallery

Jamie logoJamie
Jamie screenshot
Otter.ai logoOtter.ai
Otter.ai screenshot

Pricing, features & ratings

Jamie logo

Jamie

Starting at

$0

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Otter.ai logo

Otter.ai

Starting at

$0

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
4

Functionality

4/10

<p>It lacks many features, such as audio/video recording and automatic email drafting. This means you have to rely on the transcript for more detailed information if needed.</p>
6

Functionality

6/10

<p>Mostly only offers core AI notetaking functionality. Can record, transcribe meetings, has a mobile app, can upload your own audio/ video files for transcript. But can't record without a meeting bot, lacks analytics, lacks more customisability for meeting notes &amp; other advanced AI functionality. AI chat functionality is surprisingly strong and accurate.</p>
Ease of Use
3

Ease of Use

3/10

<p>Jamie is clunky and lacks many quick-access features found in other AI notetakers, such as the ability to click on a point in the summary for more AI-generated detail or be directed to its source in the transcript. As a result, much of the editing for summary notes is manual, as summary regeneration is not possible.</p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>Key workflows such as recording meetings, inviting the bot to meetings is generally intuitive and straightforward. You can see action items assigned to you at a glance. There are some unmarked elements / icons over the web app which will take a bit of getting used to. Some flows, such as organising meeting notes, aren't as user-friendly as they can be.</p>
Look and feel
2

Look and feel

2/10

<p>The design feels clunky and unintuitive. The dark mode UI lacks contrast, making it difficult to distinguish between elements. Navigation is confusing; for instance, clicking the chat button in the navigation bar prompts users to open the Jamie sidebar with a keyboard shortcut—what's the point of that? These kinds of things are common across the app.</p><p><br></p><p>The Meetings overview and the Decisions/Tasks/Participants sections feel cramped, with no option to open meetings on a separate page or view in full-screen mode.</p><p><br></p><p>The sidebar's theme is stuck on dark, even when the rest of the app is on light mode.</p><p><br></p><p>The sidebar itself lacks a close icon, forcing you to use keyboard shortcuts. Additionally, the persistent sidebar is annoying, as it stays above other apps and offers no quick-hide option. Overall, the interface needs significant improvement.</p>
6

Look and feel

6/10

<p>Modern, clean and visually acceptable. Functional design, nothing spectacular. Page loads are acceptable (2-3 seconds).</p>
Customisability
3

Customisability

3/10

<p>Jamie offers limited customisability. You can create templates with custom sections for summary notes, but there's no guarantee they'll appear in the final summary. Beyond that, there’s little control over what Jamie generates.</p>
4

Customisability

4/10

<p>You can freely edit transcripts and most of the meeting notes. Annoyingly, you're unable to edit meeting summary - there's only an option to regenerate it. You're also unable to customise sections of meeting notes or bring your custom templates.</p>
Ease of Setup
7

Ease of Setup

7/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. No editable note templates, but template creation includes guided input boxes. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. No advanced workflows supported, no Zapier integration or native workflow builder. Requires desktop app installation.</p>
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. No note templates. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. No advanced workflows supported, no Zapier templates or native builder.</p>
Customer Support
5

Customer Support

5/10

<p>There's a "Jamie Help Center" with some quick guides.</p>
4

Customer Support

4/10

<p>Otter has an AI chatbot on their site. However, you'll have to submit a ticket to get in touch with support. When testing on the free tier, we found ourselves hanging for several days without a reply.</p>
Integratability
1

Integratability

1/10

<p>Only supports connecting to Google or Outlook calendars, nothing else.</p>
3

Integratability

3/10

<p>Otter.ai only offers a handful of integrations with the most popular 3rd party tools e.g. Slack, Google Docs, Salesforce, Pipedrive. It lacks any integrations with project management tools or applicant tracking system, It also lacks an API for custom integrations.</p>
Ease of Migration
4

Ease of Migration

4/10

<p>You can copy and paste or share the summary notes and transcript via a link.</p>
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>You're able to download transcript, meeting summaries and audio in various formats. For transcripts, you can also include timestamp and speaker names.</p>
Loading...

Compare other AI Notetakers

Want to find out how Otter.ai or Jamie stacks up with their competitors?