logo
Search for anything...
About

Jotform vs Adobe Acrobat - Comparison 2025

Jotform vs. Adobe Acrobat

Last updated on

Reviewed by Paddy Stobbs

Stackfix Co-Founder & CEO

PS

Jotform and Adobe Acrobat serve distinctly different needs in the eSignature market. Jotform excels as a form-first platform with excellent integration capabilities and superior customer support, making it ideal for businesses that primarily need to collect structured data with occasional signature requirements.

Adobe Acrobat, on the other hand, shines in core document signing features with superior field detection and document preparation tools, better serving organizations focused purely on document signing workflows. The choice between them largely depends on whether form collection or document signing is the primary need.

Jotform Product Logo

Advantages of Jotform

Jotform is significantly better at web forms than Adobe Acrobat
While Adobe Acrobat only offers basic web form functionality, Jotform excels with 10,000+ ready-made templates and extensive customization options. This makes it ideal for organizations needing to collect structured data through forms while capturing signatures.
Jotform has far superior integration capabilities compared to Adobe Acrobat
Unlike Adobe Acrobat's limited integrations, Jotform connects with major platforms like Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, and offers Zapier support for thousands more connections. This makes it much better suited for businesses wanting to automate their document workflows.
Jotform offers significantly better customer support than Adobe Acrobat
With 24/7 availability and fast 2.5-hour response times, Jotform's support outperforms Adobe Acrobat. This makes it a better choice for organizations requiring reliable technical assistance.
Adobe Acrobat Product Logo

Advantages of Adobe Acrobat

Adobe Acrobat has superior field detection capabilities compared to Jotform
Adobe Acrobat's auto-detection of signature fields is consistently accurate and properly sized, while Jotform's detection is less reliable. This makes Adobe Acrobat better for quickly preparing documents that need multiple signature fields.
Adobe Acrobat offers better document preparation tools than Jotform
Adobe Acrobat's drag-and-drop builder provides more advanced field options and conditional logic compared to Jotform's more basic toolset. This makes it more suitable for complex document preparation needs.
Adobe Acrobat has better core eSignature functionality than Jotform
While Jotform treats eSignatures as a secondary feature, Adobe Acrobat provides more robust core eSignature capabilities, making it better suited for businesses primarily focused on document signing rather than form collection.

Jotform is best for

  • Businesses with straightforward document signing requirements
  • Who need extensive web form capabilities alongside basic eSignatures
  • And/or who need quick setup with minimal training

Adobe Acrobat is best for

  • Businesses with straightforward document signing needs
  • Who need highly accurate automatic field detection and placement
  • And/or who need basic document security with audit trails but not advanced verification

Jotform is less good for

  • Businesses with complex document workflows requiring advanced eSignature features
  • Who need to send documents in bulk to multiple recipients simultaneously
  • And/or who need detailed analytics and custom reporting on document status and signer engagement

Adobe Acrobat is less good for

  • Businesses with complex document workflows requiring multiple integrations
  • Who need advanced reporting and analytics on document performance
  • And/or who need to edit and reissue documents after sending

Gallery

Jotform logoJotform
Jotform screenshot
Adobe Acrobat logoAdobe Acrobat
Adobe Acrobat screenshot

Pricing, features & ratings

Jotform logo

Jotform

Starting at

$0

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
4

Functionality

4/10

<p>Jotform is a good eSignature solution with excellent web forms, but its eSignature features are limited as they are separate. It supports payment collection and has a mobile app but isn’t ideal for large-scale sending—no bulk send and limited auto-fill. It lacks witness and in-person signing, and eSign reports are minimal, showing only document status. Security includes password protection and audit trails but lacks ID verification or KBA.</p>
7

Functionality

7/10

<p>Adobe Acrobat is a good eSignature solution with amazing auto-field detection. It supports web forms, payment collection (via Braintree), and has a mobile app. However, it's not great for large-scale sending, as it lacks bulk send and auto-fill features. There's no witness or in-person signing, and reports are almost non-existent, offering minimal insights beyond document status. Security includes password protection and audit trails, but no ID verification or KBA.</p>
Ease of Use
9

Ease of Use

9/10

<p>For basic eSignature sharing and collection, Jotform offers a solid feature set, with its simplicity contributing to ease of use. It’s great for core eSignature needs but lacks advanced reporting, bulk sending, and e-witness or in-person signing, which may limit certain agreements. Despite these gaps, it remains exceptionally user-friendly.</p>
6

Ease of Use

6/10

<p>The platform is easy to use, though advanced document preparation takes some learning. Its clean, modern design and excellent field auto-placement speed up document creation. However, it lacks bulk sending and auto-fill from integrations, limiting workflow efficiency. A file upload field eliminates the need for separate document requests, and payment collection is available via Adobe Acrobat. However, documents cannot be edited and resent without voiding, making corrections less seamless.</p>
Look and feel
6

Look and feel

6/10

<p>Jotform keeps things simple with a clean, modern interface and an intuitive drag-and-drop builder. The theme is well-designed, and there’s a handy preview of the email and document before signing while customizing the signing order. However, the UI has a somewhat playful, less formal design and feels overly simplified for eSignatures, as it’s part of a platform primarily built for web forms.</p>
6

Look and feel

6/10

<p>Although Adobe Acrobat has a solid set of features, the interface is simple, modern, and has a nice theme. Navigation is straightforward, but it’s more of a file management platform than a typical layout for managing eSignature documents and tracking them. The drag-and-drop builder is easy to use.&nbsp;</p>
Customisability
7

Customisability

7/10

<p>Jotform handles basic e-signatures, but it's missing key advanced functionalities, including e-witnessing, meaning not all signing flows are covered.&nbsp;The absence of custom reports is a significant drawback, making it difficult to get detailed insights without API reliance.&nbsp;While the platform is simple overall, it's got decent control over branding options.</p>
4

Customisability

4/10

<p>Adobe Acrobat handles basic e-signatures but lacks advanced customizability like e-witnessing and in-person signing, limiting signing flows. User roles cannot be customized, and with no Zapier or API access, creating custom workflows isn't possible.</p>
Ease of Setup
9

Ease of Setup

9/10

<p>Jotform offers a free trial with self-serve purchasing for all tiers except enterprise. Onboarding is quick, allowing users to create eSignature documents in 5–10 minutes. Custom branding and integrations are easy to set up, while configuring reusable templates, security settings, and user roles may take a few hours.</p>
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Adobe Acrobat offers a free trial with self-serve purchasing for all tiers except Acrobat Sign Solutions, a separate product with extended eSignature features. Onboarding is simple, allowing users to create eSignature documents in 5–10 minutes. Custom branding is easy to set up, and other integrations are quick to configure, but there's no Zapier or API access. Setting up reusable templates, security settings, and signer roles may take a few hours.</p>
Customer Support
9

Customer Support

9/10

<p>Jotform’s support team is available 24/7, and you can contact them by submitting a request, with an average response time of 2 hours and 30 minutes. They also have an extensive help center with guides, FAQs, and a community forum for troubleshooting.</p>
7

Customer Support

7/10

<p>Personalized Q&amp;A is available via phone, live chat, and request submission. Higher-tier plans get 24/7 support. Self-serve support includes a comprehensive Help Center and community forums with high-quality guides and tutorials.</p>
Integratability
8

Integratability

8/10

<p>Jotform natively integrates with popular platforms like Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, and Slack. Microsoft Excel integration requires Zapier, which also enables access to thousands of additional integrations. An API is available for custom integrations and automation.</p>
1

Integratability

1/10

<p>Integrations are severely limited, with only Google Drive and Dropbox supported. It doesn’t integrate with platforms like Salesforce or Slack, and there’s no Zapier or API access, making custom integrations nearly impossible.</p>
Ease of Migration
7

Ease of Migration

7/10

<p>Jotform offers multiple ways to export completed document data. Finished documents can be exported as PDFs with the audit trail. You can also download submission data in CSV format. Native integrations enable seamless data syncing, with API options for further customization.</p>
2

Ease of Migration

2/10

<p>Adobe Acrobat offers minimal data export options, partly due to no Zapier or API access. Finished documents and audit trails can be exported as PDFs, and another major drawback is the lack of downloadable reports for tracking insights across multiple documents.</p>
Loading...

Compare other eSignature Tools

Want to find out how Jotform or Adobe Acrobat stacks up with their competitors?