logo
Search for anything...
About

Linear vs ProjectManager - Comparison 2025

Linear vs. ProjectManager

Last updated on

Reviewed by Camin McCluskey

Stackfix Co-Founder & CTO

CM

Linear and ProjectManager serve different project management needs. Linear excels as a sophisticated, streamlined tool perfect for software development teams, offering exceptional UI/UX, powerful analytics, and strategic project alignment features. Its opinionated approach and keyboard-first interface make it ideal for tech-savvy teams prioritizing speed and efficiency.

ProjectManager, conversely, shines as a more traditional project management tool with stronger resource management, time tracking, and template features, making it better suited for teams needing comprehensive project tracking and resource allocation capabilities.

Linear Product Logo

Advantages of Linear

Linear is significantly more polished and user-friendly
Linear offers a delightful, keyboard-first interface with lightning-fast page loads and beautifully laid-out screens. In contrast, ProjectManager's interface, while functional, lacks the same level of polish and sophistication. This matters particularly for teams who spend significant time in their project management tool daily.
Linear provides superior customer support
Linear's support team responds within an hour with knowledgeable assistance, while ProjectManager relies on email and phone support without in-app chat. This quick response time is crucial for teams needing immediate assistance with critical project workflows.
Linear excels at strategic project alignment
Linear's 'Initiatives' feature provides powerful yet simple organizational goal tracking, while ProjectManager lacks the ability to connect projects to company goals/OKRs. This is particularly valuable for leadership teams needing to ensure project alignment with strategic objectives.
Linear offers superior data visualization and analytics
Linear provides beautiful, powerful, and customizable analytics with multiple visualization options, while ProjectManager's reporting is more basic and limited to pre-built options. This difference is crucial for teams needing detailed project insights and custom reporting capabilities.
ProjectManager Product Logo

Advantages of ProjectManager

ProjectManager is significantly easier to use for non-technical teams
We found ProjectManager's interface to be more intuitive and accessible compared to Linear's keyboard-shortcut-heavy approach. While Linear excels for technical teams, ProjectManager's straightforward task management and drag-and-drop functionality makes it more approachable for general business users who may be less comfortable with keyboard shortcuts.
ProjectManager offers more comprehensive time tracking capabilities
Unlike Linear which lacks native time tracking, ProjectManager includes robust time tracking features including timesheet creation, approval workflows, and project-specific time allocation. This is particularly valuable for teams that need to monitor time spent on tasks for billing or productivity management.
ProjectManager excels at workload management
Unlike Linear which lacks workload visualization, ProjectManager offers comprehensive workload management features including per-day task allocation views, holiday tracking, and under/over-assignment monitoring. This is crucial for teams needing to balance resources effectively.
ProjectManager provides more flexible project views
With 7 different view options including List, Board, Gantt, Sheet, Dashboard, and Calendar views, ProjectManager offers significantly more visualization flexibility than Linear's limited Board and List views. This makes it easier for different team members to work with the view that suits them best.

Linear is best for

  • Software development teams with a low to moderate number of active projects (3-10 projects at a time)
  • Who need excellent software development workflows with powerful GitHub integration and cycle planning
  • And/or who want beautiful, keyboard-first interface

ProjectManager is best for

  • Businesses with a moderate number of active projects (5-10 projects at a time)
  • Who need efficient task management and basic workflow automation for day-to-day operations
  • And/or who want comprehensive project visibility through ready-made reports and dashboards.

Linear is less good for

  • Businesses with a very high number of active projects (15+ projects at a time)
  • Who need extensive workflow customization and flexible task management
  • And/ or need advanced time tracking, workload management, and custom field capabilities

ProjectManager is less good for

  • Businesses with a high number of active projects (10+ projects at a time) requiring sophisticated document creation and custom reporting capabilities
  • Who need advanced workflow automation with extensive third-party integrations and email templates
  • And/or who want sophisticated approval processes and built-in team chat capabilities.

Gallery

Linear logoLinear
Linear screenshot
ProjectManager logoProjectManager
ProjectManager screenshot

Pricing, features & ratings

Linear logo

Linear

Starting at

$0

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
ProjectManager logo

ProjectManager

Starting at

$16

user / month

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
6

Functionality

6/10

<p>Linear focuses on delivering exceptional functionality required for planning and building software products. including excellent product planning, cycling planning and issue tracking functionality. However, this means that compared to other PM tools, Linear lacks some common functionality, e.g. timeline/ Gantt view for tasks, adding custom fields, time-tracking, an automations module.</p>
6

Functionality

6/10

<p>ProjectManager has most of the functionality that any team will need. More importantly, these features are done well. Reporting, automations and task management are all strong and easy to use. However, none of ProjectManager's features are exceptional - they do the basics and they do them well - that's it. For example, automations are only offer 12 action and 7 trigger functions and no integrations with email, slack etc.</p>
Ease of Use
9

Ease of Use

9/10

<p>Using Linear is a delight. Its keyboard-first design allows you to breeze through workflows with ease—most actions, like creating a new task, are just a single shortcut away (press “C,” and you’re good to go). With its streamlined functionality, finding key information and navigating core workflows feels intuitive. Thanks to its smooth onboarding process, most startup employees can feel comfortable with the platform in just 1-2 hours, even with minimal guidance.</p><p>That said, Linear isn’t the most beginner-friendly tool. For users less familiar with keyboard shortcuts, it can feel a bit daunting at first. Plus, it offers fewer templates and less in-app guidance compared to alternatives like Asana or Monday, which might leave some teams wishing for a little more hand-holding.</p>
8

Ease of Use

8/10

<p>The learning curve here is not steep at all - the product is usable right from the word go. We estimate that a start-up employee would require about 1 hour and some guidance to be comfortable using all key functionalities.</p><p><br></p><p>Most key functionalities are very intuitively located. However some are hidden. For example, automations are not well-labelled on the UI.</p>
Look and feel
9

Look and feel

9/10

<p>If you like modern, minimalist app designs with a touch of elegance, then you will love Linear. Every Linear page is beautifully laid-out and colour-coded, every interaction &amp; transition is silky smooth, and page loads are lightning fast.</p>
6

Look and feel

6/10

<p>ProjectManager has some colour customisation available. That being said, it could do with a touch more finesse in places. It is by no means an unattractive piece of software but it's nothing special.</p><p><br></p><p>Loading times are fast at ~ 1 second per page.</p>
Customisability
4

Customisability

4/10

<p>Linear proudly admits that it is inflexible —and for good reason. They believe overly flexible software lets everyone create their own workflows, which eventually leads to chaos. For instance, you can’t add custom fields in Linear or build your own bespoke workflows. You’re also limited to just two task (or issue) views: board and list. It’s a “less is more” philosophy, designed to keep things simple and focused.</p>
5

Customisability

5/10

<p>ProjectManager could do better here, but still has some good customisation. You cannot create a custom report in ProjectManager - there are only self-serve reports available. However, the level of filtering available when choosing which projects, tasks, tags etc. should be measured when creating these self-serve reports is extensive. Automations, on the other hand, could do more customisation wise. They offer basic automations - but no email templates or integrations with 3rd parties, e.g. sending a message in Slack.</p>
Ease of Setup
8

Ease of Setup

8/10

<p>Linear offers a self-serve free trial and lets you purchase directly—no need to deal with sales. If you're familiar with agile methodology, then setting up Linear should be a breeze since it anticipates everything you need, including sprints, Kanban board, and a backlog. You can get started with a project and a few tasks within 10-20 minutes, with full customization taking 1-2 hours.</p>
7

Ease of Setup

7/10

<p>Offers a self-serve free trial and allows purchase without needing to talk to sales. Getting started and setting up a few tasks and subtasks should take 20-30 minutes, but it lacks a rich library of templates. Full setup should take less than a day.</p>
Customer Support
9

Customer Support

9/10

<p>Linear’s support team is easy to reach—you can submit a question directly in the app. When tested, their response time was impressive (under an hour), and the support agent was both knowledgeable and genuinely helpful.</p><p>The Linear team has also been open and responsive to feedback.</p>
7

Customer Support

7/10

<p>Personalised support is not available via in-app chat but is available on email and and over the phone. Responses are fast and helpful.</p><p><br></p><p>Self-serve materials are of great depth and quality. In particular, their onboarding materials essentially tell you all you need to know to use the ley functionality and leaves you feeling in control of the product.</p>
Integratability
7

Integratability

7/10

<p>Linear might not boast the extensive list of integrations you’ll find with other project management tools, but it likely covers everything a tech startup needs for software development. The integrations it does offer are top-notch—high-quality and thoughtfully crafted. Plus, if you need something more specific, Linear provides an API for building custom integrations.</p>
5

Integratability

5/10

<p>ProjectManager integrates with some tools natively but relies heavily of Zapier for most integrations. For example, Salesforce, Jira, onedrive, dropbox are all available only through Zapier.</p><p><br></p><p>However, ProjectManager offers an API to build custom integrations where necessary.&nbsp;</p>
Ease of Migration
9

Ease of Migration

9/10

<p>Linear makes it easy to export all your key data—workspace, team members, projects, and tasks—directly into CSV format through a self-serve option. You can also export data via its analytics module or by integrating with Google Sheets. For anything else, Linear’s API has you covered, giving you full control over exporting additional data.</p>
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>Exports of all key data, reports and dashboards are available to PDF and/or excel.</p>
Loading...

Compare other Project Management Tools

Want to find out how Linear or ProjectManager stacks up with their competitors?