| Functionality | 6 <p>ProjectManager has most of the functionality that any team will need. More importantly, these features are done well. Reporting, automations and task management are all strong and easy to use. However, none of ProjectManager's features are exceptional - they do the basics and they do them well - that's it. For example, automations are only offer 12 action and 7 trigger functions and no integrations with email, slack etc.</p> | 8 <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Wrike has most of the sought after features and is deeply customisable, offering customisable templates, automated workflows and types. It also supports OKR/goal setting and has additional features which act as a cherry on top like AI work creation and effort management.</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">However, it lacks a few things which may be useful for real time collaboration like a realtime chat between team members or any sort of messaging service. Also, although it allows files to be added to tasks, it doesn't offer a shared space for docs and files or any way to create a company wide wiki which is important for larger companies.</span></p> |
| Ease of Use | 8 <p>The learning curve here is not steep at all - the product is usable right from the word go. We estimate that a start-up employee would require about 1 hour and some guidance to be comfortable using all key functionalities.</p><p><br></p><p>Most key functionalities are very intuitively located. However some are hidden. For example, automations are not well-labelled on the UI.</p> | 5 <p>Overall, Wrike has a generally well planned UI which makes it <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">intuitive to use overall. </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">It falls short on a few aspects though, some of the language used to relate tasks is quite complex and it's difficult to build a complex workflow in the beginning. We estimate that an average startup employee would take around 1-2 days to get their hands on this tool and be able to leverage its functionality efficiently.</span></p> |
| Look and feel | 6 <p>ProjectManager has some colour customisation available. That being said, it could do with a touch more finesse in places. It is by no means an unattractive piece of software but it's nothing special.</p><p><br></p><p>Loading times are fast at ~ 1 second per page.</p> | 7 <p>The software is visually appealing generally and has a simplistic UI which makes it easier to understand what's happening on a page. The load times for any page are quite fast and has an overall attractive look and feel, except the gantt chart which looks slightly blocky/shaky.</p> |
| Customisability | 5 <p>ProjectManager could do better here, but still has some good customisation. You cannot create a custom report in ProjectManager - there are only self-serve reports available. However, the level of filtering available when choosing which projects, tasks, tags etc. should be measured when creating these self-serve reports is extensive. Automations, on the other hand, could do more customisation wise. They offer basic automations - but no email templates or integrations with 3rd parties, e.g. sending a message in Slack.</p> | 8 <p>Can customise quite a bit of the product, including custom fields, workflows, automation, reports, templates and types. However it's not open source which means that it may not offer the same amount of customisability as a tool which you can actually go ahead and tweak.</p> |
| Ease of Setup | 7 <p>Offers a self-serve free trial and allows purchase without needing to talk to sales. Getting started and setting up a few tasks and subtasks should take 20-30 minutes, but it lacks a rich library of templates. Full setup should take less than a day.</p> | 6 <p>Offers a self-serve free trial and allows purchase without needing to talk to sales. Getting started and setting up a few tasks and subtasks should take 20-30 minutes, because it has a good sample project space, but it lacks a rich library of templates. Full setup should take a day or two at most.</p> |
| Customer Support | 7 <p>Personalised support is not available via in-app chat but is available on email and and over the phone. Responses are fast and helpful.</p><p><br></p><p>Self-serve materials are of great depth and quality. In particular, their onboarding materials essentially tell you all you need to know to use the ley functionality and leaves you feeling in control of the product.</p> | 5 <p>Has tried to build a chat service but you can't actually ask many questions on it, since you normally just get template responses that a bot provides. It does however have an extensive set of FAQs and a project management guide which should help users get started.</p> |
| Integratability | 5 <p>ProjectManager integrates with some tools natively but relies heavily of Zapier for most integrations. For example, Salesforce, Jira, onedrive, dropbox are all available only through Zapier.</p><p><br></p><p>However, ProjectManager offers an API to build custom integrations where necessary. </p> | 5 <p>Supports a few integrations like Google, Outlook, Slack, JIRA and a host of other mobile applications. However, it doesn't support a few key integrations natively like Github, Zapier, Freshdesk and Zendesk which other tools do.</p> |
| Ease of Migration | 8 <p>Exports of all key data, reports and dashboards are available to PDF and/or excel.</p> | 5 <p>Has robust options to make self-serve exports of data in excel, csv or pdf and also gives API access. However it doesn't have the same number of pre-built native integrations which other tools may offer</p> |
