logo
Search for anything...
About

Pylon vs tawk.to - Comparison 2025

Pylon vs. tawk.to

Last updated on

Reviewed by Paddy Stobbs

Stackfix Co-Founder & CEO

PS

tawk.to and Pylon serve distinctly different segments of the customer support market. tawk.to excels as a free, entry-level solution ideal for small businesses needing basic support functionality, offering free live chat, AI chatbot, and help center features. Pylon, conversely, is built specifically for B2B companies heavily invested in Slack/Teams, with superior Slack integration capabilities but at a higher price point.

While tawk.to provides better mobile support capabilities and branding control, Pylon offers more sophisticated features like advanced ticket routing and AI-powered inbox management. Choose tawk.to for cost-effective basic support needs, especially if mobile support is crucial; choose Pylon if Slack integration and B2B-focused features are your priority.

Pylon Product Logo

Advantages of Pylon

Pylon is far superior at Slack integration
Pylon's Slack integration stands out, offering innovative features like AI-powered tracking of customer questions and real-time syncing of replies across channels. Unlike tawk.to which lacks Slack integration entirely, Pylon enables teams to manage support directly from Slack, collect customer feedback, and broadcast messages across channels with engagement tracking.
Pylon offers significantly better shared inbox capabilities
Pylon's shared inbox features intelligent AI organization of related threads, automatic ticket categorization, and a unique Kanban board with swimlane view. In contrast, tawk.to's inbox is cluttered, lacks custom views, and doesn't support multiple inboxes for different support channels.
Pylon provides more sophisticated Help Centre customization
Pylon offers advanced Help Centre features including version control, analytics tracking, and AI-assisted article drafting. While tawk.to offers basic Help Centre functionality, it lacks real-time preview of customizations and cannot restrict access based on user tiers.
Pylon delivers more comprehensive analytics capabilities
Pylon provides detailed analytics across multiple dimensions including custom reports, while tawk.to offers only basic KPIs with limited filtering options. This makes Pylon much more suitable for teams needing deeper insights into their support operations.
tawk.to Product Logo

Advantages of tawk.to

tawk.to is significantly more cost-effective for basic support needs
tawk.to offers core customer support features completely free, including live chat, AI chatbot, and help center functionality. While Pylon requires a paid subscription, tawk.to's free offering makes it particularly attractive for small businesses or startups with basic support needs who want to minimize costs.
tawk.to provides better branding control
tawk.to allows companies to remove vendor branding from their live chat widget and help centre, while Pylon does not offer this option. This is particularly important for businesses wanting to maintain a consistent brand experience across all customer touchpoints.
tawk.to offers superior mobile support capabilities
Unlike Pylon which lacks a mobile SDK, tawk.to provides a mobile SDK that allows businesses to embed customer support functionality directly into their mobile apps. This is particularly valuable for companies with mobile-first products or those needing to provide in-app support.

Pylon is best for

  • Businesses with a low to moderate ticket volume (100-500 tickets per day)
  • Who need AI-powered Slack-first or Microsoft Teams-first customer support and intelligent ticket organization
  • And/or who want automated ticket categorization with AI tagging and kanban-style ticket management

tawk.to is best for

  • Businesses with a very low ticket volume (<25 tickets per day)
  • Who need basic live chat and help center functionality without paying anything
  • And/or who want AI chatbot capabilities included in a free tool

Pylon is less good for

  • Businesses with a high ticket volume (500+ tickets per day)
  • Who need support for multiple channels like phone, SMS, WhatsApp and social media
  • And/or who need chat automation workflows

tawk.to is less good for

  • Businesses with a moderate ticket volume (100+ tickets per day) requiring sophisticated workflow management
  • Who need omnichannel support across social media, phone, and WhatsApp
  • And/or who need advanced automation capabilities like rule-based routing and time-based workflows

Gallery

Pylon logoPylon
tawk.to logotawk.to
tawk.to screenshot

Pricing, features & ratings

Pylon logo

Pylon

Starting at

$70

user / month

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
tawk.to logo

tawk.to

Starting at

$0

Converted from GBP

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
8

Functionality

8/10

<p>Pylon is "modern support platform for B2B companies". It offers a good range of features including support for email, live chat, ticket forms, Slack/ Teams and help centre. It also offers decent automation, AI and reporting functionality.</p><p>However, it lacks support for many channels (e.g. phone, socials) or custom objects.</p>
6

Functionality

6/10

<p>While free, Tawk.to offers basic support features: live chat, chatbot, email, Help Center creation, and minimal automation. The AI chatbot is also free. However, it doesn’t support important channels like phone and social media, and lacks advanced automation and reporting, including ticket routing.</p>
Ease of Use
8

Ease of Use

8/10

<p>Pylon has a relatively quick learning curve - an average employee should take 1-2 hours to familiarize themselves with the key workflows, with the bulk of that time spent on getting up to speed with how Slack/ Teams integration works.</p>
4

Ease of Use

4/10

<p>We find Tawk.to's interface cluttered and confusing. Live chat visitors appear as long random numbers, and you can’t create custom views to prioritize relevant tickets. There’s no option for multiple inboxes to handle different support requests. They also use unfamiliar terms like “Whisper” for internal notes.</p>
Look and feel
6

Look and feel

6/10

<p>We find Pylon's interface to be clean and modern. However, some pages can be slow to load e.g. opening a ticket takes ~2 seconds, and the analytics dashboard can take &gt;5 seconds to load.</p>
4

Look and feel

4/10

<p>Tawk.to's interface looks a bit dated, and pages can take a few seconds to load. The platform sometimes gets disconnected from the server easily, which can get quite annoying.</p>
Customisability
8

Customisability

8/10

<p>Pylon offers good customization options including custom views, custom fields, and custom reporting (including the view of customer context within Account Management). A unique feature here is that users can create swimlane diagrams for Kanban views. However, it lacks more advanced customization features like creating custom data objects and tracking custom events.&nbsp;</p>
5

Customisability

5/10

<p>Tawk.to offers basic customisability options. Users can create custom fields for customers and have good customization options over live chat (widget layout, message options, availability).</p><p>However, it lacks more advanced customization features like custom views (saved filters), custom objects, or custom reports.&nbsp;</p>
Ease of Setup
5

Ease of Setup

5/10

<p>Frustratingly, Pylon does not offer a self-serve free trial on its website. Instead you'll need to trudge through a sales demo to access the platform. However, calls are generally short and often deals are often closed in just one call if you're looking to purchase right away. Once you're in, initial setup is very slick, taking less than 10 minutes. Additionally, given its Slack centricity, connecting core channels is a one-click process.</p>
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>Tawk.to offers a simple self-serve free trial for their platform. We found the initial setup to be relatively simple, taking around 10 minutes. Setting up your first channels may take some time though - with no easy one-click email connect option, you’ll have to setup email forwarding manually. However, setting up live chat is a fairly straight forward process (pasting a script into your website).</p>
Customer Support
9

Customer Support

9/10

<p>Pylon offers support via in-app live chat and Slack/ Teams. We've found the team helpful, and quick to respond. Pylon is also known for being very responsive to product feedback.</p>
8

Customer Support

8/10

<p>The in-app live chat with the support team connects you almost instantly. The agents are patient and helpful, providing a positive support experience.</p>
Integratability
7

Integratability

7/10

<p>Pylon currently offers only 10 integrations, though they cover key areas like project management (JIRA, Linear, Asana) and CRM (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive). The recent addition of webhook support improves its integration capabilities. However, it still lacks integrations in categories like data enrichment, surveys, and marketing tools.&nbsp;It does offer an API for custom integrations.</p>
4

Integratability

4/10

<p>Tawk.to only has a handful of pre-built integrations with the most common tools like Google Analytics, Google Sheets, Slack, MailChimp and some web-builders. However, it does offer an API for custom integrations.</p>
Ease of Migration
5

Ease of Migration

5/10

<p>Pylon's data export capabilities appear to be limited. While users can export reports to CSV, it doesn't seem possible to self-export tickets.</p>
8

Ease of Migration

8/10

<p>Tawk.to allows users to export key data (e.g. ticket and agent volume) via self-serve. Export of most other data are also available via API.</p>
Loading...

Compare other Customer Support Tools

Want to find out how Pylon or tawk.to stacks up with their competitors?