logo
Search for anything...
About

ShareFile vs Jotform - Comparison 2025

ShareFile vs. Jotform

Last updated on

Reviewed by Paddy Stobbs

Stackfix Co-Founder & CEO

PS

ShareFile and Jotform serve distinctly different needs in the eSignature market. ShareFile is better suited to larger organizations requiring robust security controls and payment integration during signing, with its stronger role-based access controls and native payment processing capabilities.

Jotform, on the other hand, excels as a form-first platform with eSignature capabilities, making it ideal for small to medium-sized businesses that prioritize ease of use and need extensive web form functionality alongside basic signature collection. While both platforms offer similar core eSignature features, their strengths lie in different areas, making the choice dependent on specific business requirements.

ShareFile Product Logo

Advantages of ShareFile

ShareFile is significantly better at role-based access control than Jotform
While both products offer team management features, ShareFile provides more granular control over user permissions and access levels. This is particularly valuable for large organizations that need to maintain strict security protocols and compliance requirements.
ShareFile offers superior integration capabilities compared to Jotform
ShareFile provides native integration with Stripe for payment collection during signing, while Jotform requires third-party integrations for payment processing. This makes ShareFile more suitable for businesses that need to collect payments as part of their document signing workflow.
Jotform Product Logo

Advantages of Jotform

Jotform is vastly superior at web forms compared to ShareFile
Unlike ShareFile which lacks web form functionality, Jotform excels with over 10,000 ready-made form templates and extensive customization options. This makes it ideal for businesses that need to collect structured data through online forms alongside signatures.
Jotform provides significantly better customer support than ShareFile
With a 24/7 support team and average response time of 2.5 hours, Jotform outperforms ShareFile's basic support options. This is crucial for businesses that need reliable and quick assistance with their document signing processes.
Jotform offers superior ease of use compared to ShareFile
While ShareFile can be confusing and requires frequent help center consultation, Jotform provides an exceptionally user-friendly experience that makes it easier for non-technical users to create and manage signature workflows.

ShareFile is best for

  • Businesses with straightforward document signing requirements and strong team management needs
  • Who need granular control over user permissions and document access
  • And/or who need native integration with accounting and enterprise platforms like Salesforce

Jotform is best for

  • Businesses with straightforward document signing requirements
  • Who need extensive web form capabilities alongside basic eSignatures
  • And/or who need quick setup with minimal training

ShareFile is less good for

  • Businesses with complex document workflows requiring conditional logic and formula calculations
  • Who need detailed analytics and reporting capabilities
  • And/or who need advanced ID verification methods beyond basic authentication

Jotform is less good for

  • Businesses with complex document workflows requiring advanced eSignature features
  • Who need to send documents in bulk to multiple recipients simultaneously
  • And/or who need detailed analytics and custom reporting on document status and signer engagement

Gallery

ShareFile logoShareFile
ShareFile screenshot
Jotform logoJotform
Jotform screenshot

Pricing, features & ratings

ShareFile logo

ShareFile

Starting at

$17.60

user / month

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Jotform logo

Jotform

Starting at

$0

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
4

Functionality

4/10

<p>ShareFile is a basic eSignature solution with limited advanced features. It lacks web forms, a mobile app, and payment collection. There are no formula or conditional fields, and it doesn’t auto-suggest or place fields. It also lacks signer delegation and e-witnessing, restricting some workflows. The reports dashboard tracks document status but offers little beyond that.</p>
4

Functionality

4/10

<p>Jotform is a good eSignature solution with excellent web forms, but its eSignature features are limited as they are separate. It supports payment collection and has a mobile app but isn’t ideal for large-scale sending—no bulk send and limited auto-fill. It lacks witness and in-person signing, and eSign reports are minimal, showing only document status. Security includes password protection and audit trails but lacks ID verification or KBA.</p>
Ease of Use
6

Ease of Use

6/10

<p>The platform is generally easy to use, though advanced document preparation requires some learning. The UI can be confusing at times, and we found that we had to check the help center a few times to find some options. It lacks auto-suggest and field placement, limiting workflow efficiency. However, documents can be edited and resent without voiding, making corrections easier.</p>
9

Ease of Use

9/10

<p>For basic eSignature sharing and collection, Jotform offers a solid feature set, with its simplicity contributing to ease of use. It’s great for core eSignature needs but lacks advanced reporting, bulk sending, and e-witness or in-person signing, which may limit certain agreements. Despite these gaps, it remains exceptionally user-friendly.</p>
Look and feel
4

Look and feel

4/10

<p>The UI is plain and lacks a strong visual theme. It feels unpolished and confusing, with no dedicated global reports page—reports are only accessible through folders. Small UI bugs are present, and page load times are often slow. Logging requires entering the company subdomain as well as login details, adding unnecessary friction. The signature requests overview is too basic and could provide more detail for a quick view.</p>
6

Look and feel

6/10

<p>Jotform keeps things simple with a clean, modern interface and an intuitive drag-and-drop builder. The theme is well-designed, and there’s a handy preview of the email and document before signing while customizing the signing order. However, the UI has a somewhat playful, less formal design and feels overly simplified for eSignatures, as it’s part of a platform primarily built for web forms.</p>
Customisability
6

Customisability

6/10

<p>ShareFile typically handles capturing e-signatures well, but it's missing key advanced functionalities, including e-witnessing, signer delegation, and in-person signing, meaning not all signing flows are covered.&nbsp;The absence of custom reports is a significant drawback, making it difficult to get detailed insights without API reliance.&nbsp;While the platform is simple overall, it's got good control over user permissions and branding options.</p>
7

Customisability

7/10

<p>Jotform handles basic e-signatures, but it's missing key advanced functionalities, including e-witnessing, meaning not all signing flows are covered.&nbsp;The absence of custom reports is a significant drawback, making it difficult to get detailed insights without API reliance.&nbsp;While the platform is simple overall, it's got decent control over branding options.</p>
Ease of Setup
5

Ease of Setup

5/10

<p>ShareFile offers a free trial, with self-serve purchasing for all tiers except custom plans. The onboarding process is simple, allowing users to create eSignature documents within 5–10 minutes. It integrates directly with many platforms, though HubSpot and Slack require Zapier. Custom branding is easy to configure. Setting up reusable templates, security settings, and user roles takes a few hours, while enterprise-level setup may take around a week.</p>
9

Ease of Setup

9/10

<p>Jotform offers a free trial with self-serve purchasing for all tiers except enterprise. Onboarding is quick, allowing users to create eSignature documents in 5–10 minutes. Custom branding and integrations are easy to set up, while configuring reusable templates, security settings, and user roles may take a few hours.</p>
Customer Support
5

Customer Support

5/10

<p>There is a Help Center with a good range of articles and guides. Email support is available via request submission, as well as live chat and phone support. Response times for email support are typically within one business day.</p>
9

Customer Support

9/10

<p>Jotform’s support team is available 24/7, and you can contact them by submitting a request, with an average response time of 2 hours and 30 minutes. They also have an extensive help center with guides, FAQs, and a community forum for troubleshooting.</p>
Integratability
8

Integratability

8/10

<p>ShareFile natively integrates with platforms like Salesforce, Pipedrive, and Google Drive. HubSpot and PayPal require Zapier, which also connects to thousands of other apps. An API is available for custom integrations and automation.</p>
8

Integratability

8/10

<p>Jotform natively integrates with popular platforms like Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, and Slack. Microsoft Excel integration requires Zapier, which also enables access to thousands of additional integrations. An API is available for custom integrations and automation.</p>
Ease of Migration
7

Ease of Migration

7/10

<p>ShareFile provides multiple export options for completed documents, including PDFs with an optional audit trail. However, there are no quick-access buttons for sharing while viewing a document. Native CRM integrations allow seamless data syncing, with API options for further customization.</p>
7

Ease of Migration

7/10

<p>Jotform offers multiple ways to export completed document data. Finished documents can be exported as PDFs with the audit trail. You can also download submission data in CSV format. Native integrations enable seamless data syncing, with API options for further customization.</p>
Loading...

Compare other eSignature Tools

Want to find out how ShareFile or Jotform stacks up with their competitors?