logo
Search for anything...
About

Spellar vs Spiky - Comparison 2025

Spellar vs. Spiky

Last updated on

Reviewed by Camin McCluskey

Stackfix Co-Founder & CTO

CM

Spellar and Spiky serve distinctly different purposes within the AI notetaking space. Spellar excels as a tool for improving spoken English, offering detailed pronunciation feedback and speaking metrics through both desktop and mobile apps. However, it falls short on core notetaking functionality.

In contrast, Spiky is better suited for sales teams and meeting analysis, providing comprehensive engagement metrics, emotional analysis, and superior organization features, though it lacks mobile capabilities. Teams primarily focused on improving speaking skills should choose Spellar, while those needing detailed meeting analytics and better organization should opt for Spiky.

Spellar Product Logo

Advantages of Spellar

Spellar offers mobile app functionality

While Spiky lacks mobile capabilities entirely, Spellar provides an excellent mobile app experience with seamless desktop integration. The app's user-friendly interface allows for easy meeting recording and AI assistant interaction, particularly beneficial for teams needing to capture in-person meetings.

Spiky Product Logo

Advantages of Spiky

Spiky is significantly better at search and organization
Spiky offers excellent search capabilities within and across meetings, with keyword search and comprehensive filtering options by participant, template, company, deal, tags, and date range. Unlike Spellar, which lacks any search functionality, Spiky allows users to create collections (folders) for organizing meetings and snippets, making it much easier for teams to find and reference past conversations.
Spiky has superior CRM integration capabilities
Spiky integrates with major CRM platforms including HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive, while Spellar lacks these integrations. This makes Spiky particularly valuable for sales teams who need to maintain detailed records of customer interactions.
Spiky provides more comprehensive engagement analytics
While both tools track engagement metrics, Spiky offers a broader range of insights including emotional analysis, attention levels, and specific keyword tracking. Unlike Spellar's focus on English fluency, Spiky analyzes emotional status during questions and responses, identifies key moments, and provides detailed feedback on participant engagement.

Spellar is best for

  • Businesses with teams looking to improve their English communication skills
  • Who need feedback on pronunciation and grammar
  • And/or who need basic meeting transcription with minimal customization requirements

Spiky is best for

  • Businesses with sales teams focused on analyzing customer interactions
  • Who need comprehensive meeting engagement analytics
  • And/or who need integration with major CRM platforms like Salesforce, HubSpot, and Pipedrive

Spellar is less good for

  • Businesses with teams that need to collaborate on and organize meeting content
  • Who need to customize and edit their meeting notes and transcripts
  • And/or who need to search and analyze content across multiple meetings

Spiky is less good for

  • Businesses with teams that need quick meeting notes generation
  • Who need extensive integrations with productivity tools like Notion or Asana
  • And/or who prefer simple summaries over heavy engagement metrics

Gallery

Spellar logoSpellar
Spellar screenshot
Spiky logoSpiky
Spiky screenshot

Pricing, features & ratings

Spellar logo

Spellar

Starting at

$0

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Spiky logo

Spiky

Starting at

$0

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
2

Functionality

2/10

<p>Spellar offers little beyond pronunciation feedback and lacks core functionality such as search, organization, note editing, and custom templates. This being said, its AI chat co-pilot and meeting summaries are strong features.</p>
9

Functionality

9/10

<p>Spiky offers core AI notetaker features like audio/video recording, custom note templates, and a good AI assistant. Its standout feature is advanced performance and engagement metrics, providing deeper insights than any other AI notetaker we tested. It also delivers personalized coaching across various meeting types, including sales playbooks (e.g., BANT), tracking deal progress in real time by monitoring completed and missed topics for a clear view of team performance.</p>
Ease of Use
4

Ease of Use

4/10

<p>Spellar’s limited functionality makes it straightforward to set up, transcribe meetings, and get clear feedback on your pronunciation. The feedback looks good and clearly highlights both your mistakes and the correct alternatives. However, the lack of features like meeting search, organization tools, or note customization makes it difficult to go beyond the basics.</p>
6

Ease of Use

6/10

<p>We’ve deducted points for Spiky’s ease of use due to its confusing navigation and overwhelming performance metrics, which can be challenging for new users. Otherwise, the rest of the product is on par with most AI notetakers in terms of usability.</p>
Look and feel
3

Look and feel

3/10

<p>The interface is clean and simple, but the absence of tags, colors, and a keyword search makes organization difficult and finding things challenging. Additionally, the mandatory dark mode feels overly dark, making it hard to see. On the positive side, the feature that highlights mispronounced words in the transcript is a nice touch. If your primary goal is to get feedback on pronunciation, the app serves that purpose fairly well.</p>
5

Look and feel

5/10

<p>The navigation takes time to get used to, as other AI notetakers with similar features have organized these options more effectively. While the performance metrics are powerful, the abundance of similar-looking data can be confusing for new users.</p>
Customisability
1

Customisability

1/10

<p>Beyond choosing the length of the AI summary, customisation options are virtually non-existent. You cannot manually edit the transcript or notes, create custom templates, or organise meetings into folders, leaving you restricted to a chronological order.</p>
9

Customisability

9/10

<p>Spiky offers extensive customization, including custom templates, keyword trackers, meeting bot personalization, and editable transcripts. Spiky Agents enable fully customizable output generation, from emails to deal reviews, and can learn from example formatting. Users can leave comments on meetings, create highlights, and customize meeting templates. Custom words can be added for better transcript recognition, though this currently requires reaching out to their support.</p>
Ease of Setup
7

Ease of Setup

7/10

<p>Self-serve, no sales calls. No editable note templates or customization. Basic setup takes&nbsp;10-15 minutes. No advanced workflows supported, no Zapier templates or native builder. Requires desktop app installation.</p>
6

Ease of Setup

6/10

<p>Self-serve with no sales calls. Provides non-editable note templates. Basic setup takes 10–15 minutes. Zapier and other organization-level integrations require contacting support and scheduling a call, though a UI for direct integration within Spiky is in development.</p>
Customer Support
4

Customer Support

4/10

<p>There’s no help centre with self-help articles or an in-app support chat. Support is available via a Slack channel, where questions typically receive a response within a few hours.</p>
7

Customer Support

7/10

<p>Free-tier users have 5-day email support, with responses typically within a few hours on business days. Paid tiers offer 5-day or 7-day chat support (depending on the tier) with human agents, who usually respond within an hour. There is a help center which includes over 100 self-help articles.</p>
Integratability
3

Integratability

3/10

<p>Integrates with some common apps like Slack, Notion, and Jira. The biggest weakness is the lack of a Zapier integration, which most AI notetakers have.</p>
7

Integratability

7/10

<p>Offers direct integration with Zapier and common CRMs like Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, and Zoho. Organization-level integrations with Five9 and Aircall require contacting support and scheduling a call, though a UI for direct integration within Spiky is in development. Meeting analysis results can also be posted to Slack channels via Webhooks.</p>
Ease of Migration
6

Ease of Migration

6/10

<p>The summary notes can be quickly shared to integrated apps like Google Docs, Craft, Notion, and Confluence. There are also options to copy the notes to the clipboard, copy all as plain text, copy only the summary, or copy the summary as plain text. Additionally, the audio recording can be downloaded as an .mp4 file.</p>
10

Ease of Migration

10/10

<p>Spiky offers robust export options for meetings, including links with simple or detailed views and access controls (public or protected). A quick share button allows notes to be sent to a connected CRM, with an access list to manage visibility. Recordings can be downloaded, and transcripts are available in PDF or DOCX format.</p><p>Teams can be created, and meetings can be shared or revoked via the share button within reports or the main meeting list. Reports can be shared with teams or individuals, and multiple managers can be added to teams. Multi-level hierarchies enable seamless sharing within the organization.</p><p>An API is available to export report data to any endpoint.</p>
Loading...

Compare other AI Notetakers

Want to find out how Spellar or Spiky stacks up with their competitors?