logo
Search for anything...
About

Umami vs June - Comparison 2025

Umami vs. June

Last updated on

Reviewed by Camin McCluskey

Stackfix Co-Founder & CTO

CM

June and Umami serve distinctly different needs in the product analytics space. June is the superior choice for B2B companies needing deep account health analytics and customer retention insights, offering powerful customization and pre-built templates specifically designed for tracking account-level metrics.

However, Umami emerges as the better option for small businesses and startups seeking a simple, well-designed analytics solution, offering an easier setup process and more intuitive interface. The choice between the two largely depends on whether you need specialized B2B analytics capabilities (June) or prefer a more straightforward, general-purpose analytics tool (Umami).

Umami Product Logo

Advantages of Umami

Umami is significantly easier to use than June
Compared to June's more technical setup process, Umami offers a simpler, more intuitive interface that takes less than 20 minutes to master. This makes it ideal for small businesses without dedicated technical resources.
Umami has a superior user interface design compared to June
While June offers a modern interface, Umami stands out with its exceptionally clean, modern design and snappy performance (sub-1 second load times). This creates a more pleasant user experience for frequent analytics checks.
Umami is much easier to set up than June
Unlike June's more technical setup process, Umami offers a simple script implementation and self-serve free trial. This makes it more accessible for teams without dedicated technical resources.
June Product Logo

Advantages of June

June is significantly more customizable than Umami
While Umami offers limited customization options, June provides extensive customization capabilities for dashboard tiles, including size, display type, intervals, and color options. This is particularly valuable for teams needing to create tailored analytics views for different stakeholders.
June has superior pre-built report templates for B2B analytics
Unlike Umami which lacks pre-built templates, June excels with its B2B-focused templates that automatically track account health and user behavior. This is especially useful for commercial teams needing immediate insights into customer retention and churn risks.
June offers more comprehensive integration options than Umami
While Umami has limited integrations, June connects with multiple third-party analytics suites and CRMs including HubSpot, Salesforce, and Stripe. This makes it more suitable for businesses needing to consolidate data from multiple sources.

Umami is best for

  • Businesses with basic analytics needs seeking a clean, simple hybrid web/product analytics solution
  • Who need basic product analytics capabilities like cohort analysis and user journey mapping
  • And/or who need a tool that's quick to implement with minimal setup complexity

June is best for

  • Businesses with B2B accounts seeking automated insights to prevent churn and boost retention
  • Businesses with commercial teams who need immediate analytics insights without data wrangling
  • Who need automated account health monitoring across their B2B customer base
  • And/or who need powerful event tracking focused specifically on customer retention metrics

Umami is less good for

  • Businesses with complex product analytics needs requiring automatic event capture and advanced behavioral tracking
  • Who need extensive data warehouse integrations and third-party tool connectivity
  • And/or who need enterprise-grade security certifications and persistent cross-session user tracking

June is less good for

  • Businesses with broad analytics needs beyond B2B account health and retention tracking
  • Businesses with mobile-first products requiring native SDK integration
  • Who need real-time analytics across all data sources
  • And/or who need visual behavior analysis through heatmaps and session replays

Gallery

Umami logoUmami
Umami screenshot
June logoJune
June screenshot

Pricing, features & ratings

Umami logo

Umami

Starting at

$0

Billed monthly

Pricing calculatorVisit Website
Stackfix Verdict
Functionality
5

Functionality

5/10

<p>As simple web analytics tools go, we were pleasantly surprised by Umami's range of functionality. Not only does it offer the fundamentals of web analytics - page views, referral source tracking and visitor segmentation data - but it also offers some product analytics too such as cohort retention data and user journey mapping.</p>
4

Functionality

4/10

<p>June excels at what it does- which is taking event-driven and unique user data seamlessly into useable reports and insights. Limitations in other areas including replays, heatmaps, and more, are your trade-off. This limits its scope and established a focus area of how your B2B users are using the platform and how to retain these clients by identifying signs of churn.</p><p>One core feature to June is Feature Usage. This is oriented around tracking feature adoption and conversely, pain points and areas that users may be stuck on.</p>
Ease of Use
8

Ease of Use

8/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Given its limited feature set and beautiful design, Umami is particularly easy to use. It would take an average SMB employee less than 20 minutes to master its use.</span></p>
7

Ease of Use

7/10

<p>June's strong suit is creating immediately usable events and reports from connected data sources. This is meant to be a solution for commercial oriented teams to have quality reporting at their fingertips minus the configuration process</p><p>We liked the immediately available reports in areas of key metrics relevant to firms looking to tackle user churn and customer retention across their B2B accounts.</p><p>In testing, we found it easy to use filters, create dashboards, edit events, and more in spite of the more deep and granular controls also available.</p>
Look and feel
8

Look and feel

8/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Umami is a very well design analytics tool. Its aesthetic is clean and modern. Additionally, when tested we found page load time to be snappy and responsive (&lt;1s).</span></p>
7

Look and feel

7/10

<p>June's interface is modern and enticing. We find it to be generally in line with the interfaces of other good modern sites. This was also a site that was easy to navigate in spite of its relatively more advanced granular control and customisation options.</p>
Customisability
4

Customisability

4/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Beyond custom events and some product analytics report creation, Umami offers limited scope for customization. We would like to have seen more options to tweak the main dashboard itself and change how data is visualized.</span></p>
8

Customisability

8/10

<p>June has great customisation options available behind each of their key features.</p><p>In testing, we found a wealth of options for customising each dashboard tile including size, display type (graph, chart, etc), intervals, alert setup, object source, and even colour. This customisation was implemented all while maintaining a comparatively smooth setup process and clean user interface.</p><p>We also liked the ability to create powerful and straightforward custom filters, events, and audiences.</p>
Ease of Setup
7

Ease of Setup

7/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Like most web analytics products, Umami was also very simple to implement - requiring only a simple script. Additionally, it offers a self-serve free trial. Given the lack of complex functionality, there's little to set up in terms of additional customization either.</span></p>
4

Ease of Setup

4/10

<p>Possessing most of the typical onboarding workflows typical to product analytics suites, June does run a slightly more technical setup process. This might mean non-technical team members may struggle to integrate June themselves. Judging by their target clients and documentation, June assumes the usage and availability of developers for implementation.</p><p>In testing, we liked the demo data that could be viewed by a single toggle switch. This allows us to visualise and interact with a finished dashboard and data. Serving as a reference point, this demo data allowed us to learn how to configure the dash and data from a sandbox-style learning environment.</p>
Customer Support
6

Customer Support

6/10

<p>Umami offers fairly robust developer documentation that is simple and easy to digest. We appreciate the clarity of its layout. However, we would have appreciated better documentation search being implemented.</p>
6

Customer Support

6/10

<p>Reaching customer support wasn't the easiest process, with a less visible help button in the bottom right corner the only way to quickly reach help resources. From this button, we found that we were immediately taken to an external help page that whilst it had decent resources, still was external and needing several clicks.</p><p>Chatting with support starts with querying an AI bot, which admittedly did give a good answer with suspected LLM/RAG integration. The option to speak with a human came up next and we got a banner that June typically replies within a day.</p>
Integratability
3

Integratability

3/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Umami offers a fairly robust API through which you can interact with data programatically. However, it offers little to no integrations beyond this.</span></p>
5

Integratability

5/10

<p>June has integrations with several third party analytics suites and CRMs that put it at the middle of the pack when it comes to integrations. As a product with a relatively more nuanced and niche use-case, its data sources were limited to its web SDK, Segment, Freshpaint, and Rudderstack as well as importers from Amplitude and Mixpanel.</p><p>We did see the typical CRM integrations of HubSpot, Attio, and Salesforce amongst others like Stripe, Slack, and their own API.</p>
Ease of Migration
6

Ease of Migration

6/10

<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Umami offers self-serve export functionality for key datapoints via its web app. Additionally, its API is robust and allows business to access datapoints programatically.</span></p>
5

Ease of Migration

5/10

<p>June has several export options generally in line with the average of the segment. Expected export types like CSVs, an API, and shareable dashboards via link were present, and we liked the ability to send graphs as a time-bound alert.</p><p>However, with its limited integrations, exporting June data can be a more manual process if not directly supported.</p>
Loading...

Compare other Product Analytics Tools

Want to find out how June or Umami stacks up with their competitors?