Lattice and Workleap offer distinctly different approaches to performance management. Lattice is the more comprehensive solution, better suited to larger organizations requiring sophisticated review processes, extensive customization, and detailed analytics. Its strength lies in providing a complete suite of performance management tools with robust customization options. Workleap, on the other hand, excels in specific areas like goal management and automated pulse surveys, making it more appropriate for smaller teams prioritizing simplicity and immediate engagement insights over comprehensive functionality. While both platforms have strong user interfaces, Lattice offers more depth and sophistication across its feature set, whereas Workleap provides a more streamlined experience in its core competencies.
Search for anything...
Workleap vs Lattice - Comparison 2025
Workleap vs. Lattice
Last updated on
Reviewed by Paddy Stobbs
Stackfix Co-Founder & CEO
Advantages of Workleap
Workleap has a more intuitive goal management interface than Lattice
Workleap offers superior automated pulse surveys compared to Lattice
Advantages of Lattice
Lattice is significantly more comprehensive in performance reviews than Workleap
Lattice offers superior customization capabilities compared to Workleap
Lattice has more sophisticated performance analytics than Workleap
Workleap is best for
- Businesses with straightforward goal-tracking needs who prioritize pulse surveys and engagement
- Businesses with manager-driven performance requirements who value simplicity over customization
- Who need an intuitive goal-tracking system that clearly shows organizational alignment
- And/or who need automated, research-backed pulse surveys with minimal setup effort
Lattice is best for
- Businesses with complex performance management needs seeking an intuitive, comprehensive solution
- Businesses with established OKR frameworks and goal-setting processes
- Who need to run sophisticated 360-degree feedback programs
- And/or who need advanced 1:1 meeting management capabilities
Workleap is less good for
- Businesses with complex review needs requiring extensive customization and automation
- Businesses with comprehensive 360-degree review requirements that need external reviewer integration, automated recurring cycles, and question templates
- Who need granular performance metrics tracking and customizable reporting dashboards
- And/or who need advanced automation features like recurring review scheduling and compensation milestone tracking
Lattice is less good for
- Businesses with simple performance needs who want quick, recurring review automation
- Businesses with basic performance management needs who want a lightweight, straightforward solution
- Who need quick-glance performance dashboards for daily reporting
- And/or who need extensive integration options beyond basic HRIS connections
Gallery
Workleap.png%2Fpublic&w=3840&q=75)
Lattice
Pricing, features & ratings
 Workleap Starting at $6.25user / month Billed monthly |  Lattice Starting at $11user / month Billed monthly |
|---|
| Stackfix Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|
| Functionality | 7 <p>Workleap falls short on features compared to major competitors like 15Five, Lattice and Leapsome. However, it excels in pulse surveys/engagement and goal tracking/management, offering straightforward, ready-to-use solutions for teams valuing simplicity.</p><p>Significant limitations exist in their 360 review capabilities, particularly regarding automations and templates. The platform also struggles with cycle progress monitoring and performance metrics tracking.</p><p>That said, if Workleap's available functionality aligns well with your team's specific workflow needs, it's worth consideration.</p> | 9 <p>Lattice is a top-tier Performance Management platform that packs extensive features and AI tools throughout its system. While it excels in most areas, it lacks some quality-of-life features found in competing platforms - most notably, pre-built pulse surveys that are ready for immediate use.</p> |
| Ease of Use | 6 <p>Workleap offers notably inconsistent user experiences across its various functions. The reports tab and specific modules like surveys provide excellent, immediately accessible insights.</p><p>However, daily use of certain tools—particularly the performance module—can be quite time-consuming due to the absence of proper scheduling automations and templates. At worst, these limitations make the experience frustratingly incomplete especially for teams looking for more control over their processes.</p> | 8 <p>Lattice's consistent interface design helps users get up to speed quickly. The personalized landing page gives immediate access to tasks, goals, and key information. Once users master 1-2 modules, they can easily navigate the rest of the platform. A standout feature is the guided workflow that walks users through outstanding tasks via an information-rich yet well-designed interface. For administrators, expect a somewhat steeper learning curve due to the platform's extensive functionality.</p> |
| Look and feel | 8 <p>Workleap offers a modern, welcoming interface comparable to other comprehensive performance management solutions in its category. Navigation is exceptionally straightforward with intuitive design guiding user journeys. The platform maintains sufficient visual interest for extended use, and we anticipate no friction regarding visual appeal for new users.</p><p>However, it's worth noting that the minimal design somewhat reflects the limited feature set. The platform can occasionally feel sparse and lightweight, particularly in areas where functionality lags behind leading competitors.</p> | 9 <p>Lattice offers intuitive interfaces for both managers and end users. Managers and team members enjoy a professional, visually appealing platform with consistent design across all modules. HR executives and administrators benefit from a clean, comprehensive console that remains visually engaging even during long sessions. However, a few pages (like the Explorer and personal development sections) suffer from visual clutter and feel more complex than the rest of the platform.</p> |
| Customisability | 4 <p>Workleap offers minimal customisation beyond basic branding. The platform essentially limits users to creating custom forms, with notable absences including customisable review and feedback templates, branding options, customisable exports and even adjustable dashboard views.</p><p>Users prioritising customisation should consider alternative solutions—the platform's simplicity in certain functions directly corresponds to a significant lack of customisation options.</p> | 7 <p>Lattice provides standard visual customization options including logos and themes.</p><p>Where it truly excels is in its extensive data configuration capabilities, allowing administrators to load chosen datasets into an explorer tab for further analysis and visualisation.</p><p>Each feature page also includes multiple data views, complemented by the dedicated explorer for creating custom visualisations.</p><p>However, Lattice's customisation capabilities are somewhat limited when it comes to documents, forms, and surveys compared to some competitors like ThriveSparrow which offers extensive visual and structural changes to their review forms.</p> |
| Ease of Setup | 6 <p>Workleap presents contrasting experiences with setup. The well-developed functions like pulse surveys and goals are remarkably straightforward to configure and launch. However, other features such as the performance module's reviews lack even basic templates to begin with.</p><p>Setup complexity varies significantly by module. Navigation, however, is consistently intuitive across the platform.</p><p>We estimate that an HR executive or team manager could have the well-designed features operational within a day for tracking surveys, NPS and goals. Conversely, more challenging functions like the reviews module might require a dedicated HR professional up to two days to configure properly, with potentially longer timeframes for less experienced administrators.</p> | 8 <p>Lattice provides a smooth onboarding process with helpful guided walkthroughs and a well-designed trial account. The pre-populated sample data effectively demonstrates all platform functions and serves as a setup guide. During testing, we had accounts running and surveys deployed within a day—suggesting most organizations could be operational just as quickly. One area for improvement is Lattice's integration capabilities, which are only slightly above average and might limit data importing options.</p> |
| Customer Support | 5 <p>Workleap's customer support starts with a standard AI chatbot interface on the main screen. We found it relatively straightforward to receive AI-powered answers (using retrieval-augmented generation) for our feature queries, with options to view relevant documentation or escalate to a human agent. When using this pathway, chat conversations are forwarded to their support team, which typically responds within 4 hours or one working day at most.</p> | 5 <p>We found Lattice's chat support bot to be easily accessible with a single click. However, its effectiveness is limited by one significant drawback: conversations don't persist when users navigate between pages, forcing them to restart their support queries with each page change.</p> |
| Integratability | 7 <p>Workleap integrations are on the higher end of the native integration list, offering 15+ HRIS connectors alone.</p> | 6 <p>Whilst not the most extensive in the category, Lattice offers a decent suite of native integrations. These span your typical top HRIS platforms plus a few across ATS, communication, IAM, background checks, and benefits.</p><p>We would have liked to have seen some native integrations for project management software like Jira, having to instead rely on their API.</p> |
| Ease of Migration | 5 <p>In our testing, we found no export functions or capabilities beyond the industry standard of CSVs, PDF, and their own API.</p> | 5 <p>Due to the limited number of native integrations, Lattice only connects and exports through the typical formats of PDF, CSV, and pushing to Slack amongst others.</p> |
Loading...
Compare other Performance Management Tools
Want to find out how Lattice or Workleap stacks up with their competitors?