Leapsome and Workleap represent contrasting approaches to performance management, with Leapsome offering comprehensive control and Workleap focusing on simplicity in specific areas. Leapsome is better suited to mid-market organizations with dedicated HR teams who can leverage its extensive customization and automation capabilities across reviews, goals, and analytics. Workleap, however, better serves smaller teams or manager-led implementations where intuitive goal tracking and automated pulse surveys are the primary requirements. While both platforms score well on look and feel, Leapsome's broader functionality and superior review management make it the more versatile solution, despite Workleap's advantages in specific areas like goal visualization and survey automation.
Search for anything...
Workleap vs Leapsome - Comparison 2025
Workleap vs. Leapsome
Last updated on
Reviewed by Paddy Stobbs
Stackfix Co-Founder & CEO
Advantages of Workleap
Workleap has a more intuitive goal management interface than Leapsome
Workleap excels at pulse surveys with superior automation compared to Leapsome
Advantages of Leapsome
Leapsome is significantly more comprehensive in review management than Workleap
Leapsome provides superior review scheduling automation compared to Workleap
Leapsome offers better performance tracking and analytics than Workleap
Workleap is best for
- Businesses with straightforward goal-tracking needs who prioritize pulse surveys and engagement
- Businesses with manager-driven performance requirements who value simplicity over customization
- Who need an intuitive goal-tracking system that clearly shows organizational alignment
- And/or who need automated, research-backed pulse surveys with minimal setup effort
Leapsome is best for
- Businesses with dedicated HR teams seeking comprehensive performance management with extensive control
- Businesses with mid-sized to large departments requiring sophisticated performance tracking
- Who need advanced goal alignment and OKR implementation across organizational hierarchies
- And/or who need extensive survey capabilities with advanced data visualization
Workleap is less good for
- Businesses with complex review needs requiring extensive customization and automation
- Businesses with comprehensive 360-degree review requirements that need external reviewer integration, automated recurring cycles, and question templates
- Who need granular performance metrics tracking and customizable reporting dashboards
- And/or who need advanced automation features like recurring review scheduling and compensation milestone tracking
Leapsome is less good for
- Businesses with limited HR resources or without dedicated personnel to manage complex performance processes
- Who need quick access to unified performance metrics and dashboards without extensive setup
- And/or who need to create and manage performance improvement plans directly within reviews
Gallery
Workleap.png%2Fpublic&w=3840&q=75)
Leapsome.png%2Fpublic&w=3840&q=75)
Pricing, features & ratings
 Workleap Starting at $6.25user / month Billed monthly |  Leapsome Starting at $8.15Converted from EUR Billed monthly |
|---|
| Stackfix Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|
| Functionality | 7 <p>Workleap falls short on features compared to major competitors like 15Five, Lattice and Leapsome. However, it excels in pulse surveys/engagement and goal tracking/management, offering straightforward, ready-to-use solutions for teams valuing simplicity.</p><p>Significant limitations exist in their 360 review capabilities, particularly regarding automations and templates. The platform also struggles with cycle progress monitoring and performance metrics tracking.</p><p>That said, if Workleap's available functionality aligns well with your team's specific workflow needs, it's worth consideration.</p> | 8 <p>Leapsome offers core performance management features like 1:1 meetings, feedback, reviews, surveys, and goal tracking—matching competitors Lattice and 15Five. While an optional learning module is available, the platform lacks performance improvement plans and has limited performance tracking capabilities. </p> |
| Ease of Use | 6 <p>Workleap offers notably inconsistent user experiences across its various functions. The reports tab and specific modules like surveys provide excellent, immediately accessible insights.</p><p>However, daily use of certain tools—particularly the performance module—can be quite time-consuming due to the absence of proper scheduling automations and templates. At worst, these limitations make the experience frustratingly incomplete especially for teams looking for more control over their processes.</p> | 7 <p>Leapsome provides regular users with a streamlined experience, offering clean interfaces and effective prompts for upcoming deadlines and tasks. This simplicity creates an intuitive environment for team members who aren't involved in administration.</p><p>For managers and administrators, however, the platform demands greater involvement. The extensive customization options introduce complexity through varied permissions, admin roles, and cycle ownership designations. Common elements like performance tracking dashboards require manual setup rather than being readily available. This added complexity makes Leapsome better suited for mid-market organizations with dedicated HR personnel who can properly configure and maintain the system while maximizing its robust feature set.</p> |
| Look and feel | 8 <p>Workleap offers a modern, welcoming interface comparable to other comprehensive performance management solutions in its category. Navigation is exceptionally straightforward with intuitive design guiding user journeys. The platform maintains sufficient visual interest for extended use, and we anticipate no friction regarding visual appeal for new users.</p><p>However, it's worth noting that the minimal design somewhat reflects the limited feature set. The platform can occasionally feel sparse and lightweight, particularly in areas where functionality lags behind leading competitors.</p> | 8 <p>Leapsome's interface features clear navigation and an informative landing page for all users. While the design is clean and customizable, some information is hard to find, requiring extra exploration to locate specific features.</p> |
| Customisability | 4 <p>Workleap offers minimal customisation beyond basic branding. The platform essentially limits users to creating custom forms, with notable absences including customisable review and feedback templates, branding options, customisable exports and even adjustable dashboard views.</p><p>Users prioritising customisation should consider alternative solutions—the platform's simplicity in certain functions directly corresponds to a significant lack of customisation options.</p> | 7 <p>Leapsome provides marginally above-average customization capabilities. While it covers basic options like logo changes, its dashboard creation tools offer somewhat better functionality than competitors, including tile resizing and various data visualization options. However, these enhancements represent only modest improvements over standard industry offerings.</p> |
| Ease of Setup | 6 <p>Workleap presents contrasting experiences with setup. The well-developed functions like pulse surveys and goals are remarkably straightforward to configure and launch. However, other features such as the performance module's reviews lack even basic templates to begin with.</p><p>Setup complexity varies significantly by module. Navigation, however, is consistently intuitive across the platform.</p><p>We estimate that an HR executive or team manager could have the well-designed features operational within a day for tracking surveys, NPS and goals. Conversely, more challenging functions like the reviews module might require a dedicated HR professional up to two days to configure properly, with potentially longer timeframes for less experienced administrators.</p> | 8 <p>Leapsome offers one of the better setup experiences in its category, featuring excellent onboarding with a helpful sandbox mode containing dummy data to help users understand the platform's workflows. However, this sandbox has limitations—users cannot independently test creating reviews themselves.</p><p>The platform loses some points for navigation intuitiveness. Likely due to its high customizability, establishing processes like goals and review workflows requires more time than expected.</p><p>Regarding implementation timeframe, teams should plan for 1.5-2 days to fully configure the platform. Teams led by HR executives who can leverage the extensive customization options will trend toward the shorter end of this estimate.</p> |
| Customer Support | 5 <p>Workleap's customer support starts with a standard AI chatbot interface on the main screen. We found it relatively straightforward to receive AI-powered answers (using retrieval-augmented generation) for our feature queries, with options to view relevant documentation or escalate to a human agent. When using this pathway, chat conversations are forwarded to their support team, which typically responds within 4 hours or one working day at most.</p> | 7 <p>Leapsome features one of the better help systems in its category, with an accessible chat bubble that provides both an AI chatbot and various support resources directly from the main interface.While the bot doesn't always provide perfectly matched answers, it smoothly transitions complex inquiries to human support via email follow-up.</p><p>In our testing, we got a follow up response to our request for a human answer after 45 minutes.</p><p>The platform's help documentation also includes convenient 15-minute support calls that users can schedule through Calendly during business hours.</p> |
| Integratability | 7 <p>Workleap integrations are on the higher end of the native integration list, offering 15+ HRIS connectors alone.</p> | 9 <p>Leapsome offers an extensive integration library, connecting with numerous HRIS platforms and management tools like Jira. While unlisted software still requires custom API integration, the platform's comprehensive integration options greatly increase the chances of importing your employee data without complications.</p> |
| Ease of Migration | 5 <p>In our testing, we found no export functions or capabilities beyond the industry standard of CSVs, PDF, and their own API.</p> | 5 <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">In testing, we found Leapsome to be largely in line with the average exportability features we see in the segment. We found the typical export functionalities of CSV and PDF within the reports, and some level of integrations with Slack amongst others to bring Leapsome's data beyond the software.</span></p> |
Loading...
Compare other Performance Management Tools
Want to find out how Leapsome or Workleap stacks up with their competitors?